Currently, the message will look something like this:

As you can see, it says that if you want to add another manager, you will need to remove managers until there are fewer than 40. So, they're telling you to remove managers. In this case, that would be half the managers. I'm certain that would be considered studio raiding. Not only would it be against the studio rules:

but also the community guidelines (src). I'm suggesting removing the part about removing managers until there are fewer than 40 to add one. Mockup by me:

ScratchCat1038 wrote:

Currently, the message will look something like this:

As you can see, it says that if you want to add another manager, you will need to remove managers until there are fewer than 40. So, they're telling you to remove managers. In this case, that would be half the managers. I'm certain that would be considered studio raiding. Not only would it be against the studio rules:

but also the community guidelines (src). I'm suggesting removing the part about removing managers until there are fewer than 40 to add one. Mockup by me:

Support, we wouldn't want people to think raiding studios and removing all the managers is allowed.

No support, New Scratchers would be confused on what to do. (New Scratchers can manage studios promoted by the owner.)

No support, the message doesn't provide any solution to the problem, making it more confusing

No support. I see your intentions but I think it's going to hurt more than it will help.

AlfabetonsOfficial wrote:

No support, New Scratchers would be confused on what to do. (New Scratchers can manage studios promoted by the owner.)

wvj wrote:

No support, the message doesn't provide any solution to the problem, making it more confusing

290Scratcher wrote:

No support. I see your intentions but I think it's going to hurt more than it will help.

Okay okay, I'll change it.

Semi support. This would help prevent people from thinking it's OK to remove a ton of managers, but it's also a bit long and I don't want to read all of that. Maybe instead of offering a solution, make it say that you can only have 40 managers at a time? That would be much simpler, easy to understand, and would not promote raids.

ScolderCreations wrote:

Semi support. This would help prevent people from thinking it's OK to remove a ton of managers, but it's also a bit long and I don't want to read all of that. Maybe instead of offering a solution, make it say that you can only have 40 managers at a time? That would be much simpler, easy to understand, and would not promote raids.

I had that before and…

AlfabetonsOfficial wrote:

No support, New Scratchers would be confused on what to do. (New Scratchers can manage studios promoted by the owner.)

wvj wrote:

No support, the message doesn't provide any solution to the problem, making it more confusing

290Scratcher wrote:

No support. I see your intentions but I think it's going to hurt more than it will help.

Just because people don't support a suggestion, doesn't mean it's not a good idea.

bump

pbum
bpum
bupm
bump

Brining it up will just make then do it.

Chunky no support

cruncherBones wrote:

Brining it up will just make then do it.

Chunky no support

I'll change it (again).

bumperooni

I think that the text underneath the main part of the message should be something like this;

Please remember that you can no longer promote managers if you already have 40 or more of them.

I don't believe that would give anyone any ideas.

BUMP

kat-coder wrote:

BUMP

Please don't bump topics that are on the front page.

bump

Bump

bumpp