Does if on edge, bounce have a workaround?

fdreerf

4096bits wrote:
god286 wrote:
Okay…
turn cw (<touching [edge v] ?> * (180)) degrees
I guess you could say this is smart?
Not so sure if it's good, though
I don't think so, then it would always do “true” * 180 or “false” * 180, which we definitely know are NOT possible.

True and false are automatically converted to 1 and 0.

4096bits

fdreerf wrote:
4096bits wrote:
god286 wrote:
Okay…
turn cw (<touching [edge v] ?> * (180)) degrees
I guess you could say this is smart?
Not so sure if it's good, though
I don't think so, then it would always do “true” * 180 or “false” * 180, which we definitely know are NOT possible.
True and false are automatically converted to 1 and 0.

It still won't work - the sprite will only go back and forth, or it glitches out.

fdreerf

Well, I can't find a math equation on how the Law of Reflection works, so someone will just have to recreate this:

don't worry about the refraction it's unimportant

Wyan100

GUYS I THINK I FIGURED IT OUT!

LINK TO THE PROJECT HERE!

Last edited by Wyan100 (Aug. 22, 2020 15:59:06)

Wyan100

Wyan100 wrote:
GUYS I THINK I FIGURED IT OUT!

LINK TO THE PROJECT HERE!

Wow I soon as I post this literally everyone abandons the topic

geometric_ghast

Wyan100 wrote:
GUYS I THINK I FIGURED IT OUT!

LINK TO THE PROJECT HERE!

Wow! That's seems like a good workaround

Goodthingsaregood66

It really does!

Goodthingsaregood66

Since this topic is still open somehow, what is the conclusion?

windows11microsoft

no but if you can cheat using of screenshot of snap snap logo with old scratch logo you done
try to find a way to make it working btw

(item ( (pick random (1) to (4))) of [list v] :: list)

list containts code org snap scratch tynker

windows11microsoft

god 286 it worked

Discuss Scratch