Discuss Scratch

TopicBumper
New Scratcher
100+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

Ihatr wrote:

Jokes on you, a manager can reject you if they don't feel you've been constructive enough!
That's not very fair. It doesn't say that anywhere in the description, and I thought they no longer did that to be fair and objective. I also think I have been quite helpful in digging up topics that need discussion.
Ihatr
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

TopicBumper wrote:

Ihatr wrote:

Jokes on you, a manager can reject you if they don't feel you've been constructive enough!
That's not very fair. It doesn't say that anywhere in the description, and I thought they no longer did that to be fair and objective. I also think I have been quite helpful in digging up topics that need discussion.
You called your account a turd, so I don't think you should join us if you think you aren't constructive.

Plus, it's officially a rule. Check the special actions studio.
TopicBumper
New Scratcher
100+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

Ihatr wrote:

Plus, it's officially a rule. Check the special actions studio.
I'm going to do what EmeraldThunder does best and file a complaint then!
leahcimto
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

TopicBumper wrote:

Ihatr wrote:

Plus, it's officially a rule. Check the special actions studio.
I'm going to do what EmeraldThunder does best and file a complaint then!
uhh go for it?

Last edited by leahcimto (Feb. 18, 2021 21:23:03)

mitdk
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

Hi, Looks like this is a duplicate.
the2000
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

mitdk wrote:

Hi, Looks like this is a duplicate.
Wow, nice catch. (Assuming someone hasn't brought this up already; I'm too lazy to check)
NotDucki_
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

the2000 wrote:

mitdk wrote:

Hi, Looks like this is a duplicate.
Wow, nice catch. (Assuming someone hasn't brought this up already; I'm too lazy to check)
*cough cough*

Paddle2See wrote:

BearSlothCoding wrote:

Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:

Sorry, but this is a duplicate.

Please continue the discussion in the link above. That way, the conversation sticks in one place, rather than being scattered across the forums.
Actually, that one is a duplicate of this one.
Yeah - but that one talks about the 120 second limit (not the 60 second limit) - and there is almost no discussion on it. I think I will merge this with the other 60 second one and we'll go from there.
the2000
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

NotDucki_ wrote:

the2000 wrote:

mitdk wrote:

Hi, Looks like this is a duplicate.
Wow, nice catch. (Assuming someone hasn't brought this up already; I'm too lazy to check)
*cough cough*

Paddle2See wrote:

-snip-
Lol, at least I predicted it would be a good idea to mention that in my last post
mybearworld
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

To the top this topic teleports.

Last edited by mybearworld (Aug. 19, 2021 10:08:23)

Tailsic111
Scratcher
41 posts

edit to 60 second rule

100% support, the 60 second rule is dumb, even if you are a scratcher, you need to wait for a VERY large amount of time between posts on the forums
SonicFanX123_321
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

support, its very good
dave-alt-4
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

support !
Tunde123
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

dave-alt-4 wrote:

support !
Why do you support? Please be constructive.
medians
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

Bringing this topic up.
leahcimto
Scratcher
1000+ posts

edit to 60 second rule

deleted

Last edited by leahcimto (June 27, 2024 16:06:04)

Powered by DjangoBB