Discuss Scratch

meepeygamer567
Scratcher
500+ posts

Squid Game

DawnRooney27 wrote:

meepeygamer567 wrote:

We if you are too lazy to read information in the post I provided you I’ll tell you.
We didn't read it because advertising your own topic isn't the way to go.
That ain’t an ad. That information.
PrincessAudrey2385
Scratcher
97 posts

Squid Game

meepeygamer567 wrote:

DawnRooney27 wrote:

meepeygamer567 wrote:

We if you are too lazy to read information in the post I provided you I’ll tell you.
We didn't read it because advertising your own topic isn't the way to go.
That ain’t an ad. That information.
Technally it is because
1. It's Yours
2. Even if it's related, Scratchers are still welcome to post their questions instead of referring to the same one.
meepeygamer567
Scratcher
500+ posts

Squid Game

PrincessAudrey2385 wrote:

meepeygamer567 wrote:

DawnRooney27 wrote:

meepeygamer567 wrote:

We if you are too lazy to read information in the post I provided you I’ll tell you.
We didn't read it because advertising your own topic isn't the way to go.
That ain’t an ad. That information.
Technally it is because
1. It's Yours
2. Even if it's related, Scratchers are still welcome to post their questions instead of referring to the same one.
Did she mention the link? Where is the link above this text? That’s info not my ad.
PrincessAudrey2385
Scratcher
97 posts

Squid Game

meepeygamer567 wrote:

PrincessAudrey2385 wrote:

meepeygamer567 wrote:

DawnRooney27 wrote:

meepeygamer567 wrote:

We if you are too lazy to read information in the post I provided you I’ll tell you.
We didn't read it because advertising your own topic isn't the way to go.
That ain’t an ad. That information.
Technally it is because
1. It's Yours
2. Even if it's related, Scratchers are still welcome to post their questions instead of referring to the same one.
Did she mention the link? Where is the link above this text? That’s info not my ad.
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/5694215/
meepeygamer567
Scratcher
500+ posts

Squid Game

PrincessAudrey2385 wrote:

meepeygamer567 wrote:

PrincessAudrey2385 wrote:

meepeygamer567 wrote:

DawnRooney27 wrote:

meepeygamer567 wrote:

We if you are too lazy to read information in the post I provided you I’ll tell you.
We didn't read it because advertising your own topic isn't the way to go.
That ain’t an ad. That information.
Technally it is because
1. It's Yours
2. Even if it's related, Scratchers are still welcome to post their questions instead of referring to the same one.
Did she mention the link? Where is the link above this text? That’s info not my ad.
https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/5694215/
That's now advertizing. It also came from you not me.
1Oaktree2
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Squid Game

Please can you both stop arguing! The topic has basically been derailed and this is all unnecessary. PrincessAudrey2385, just because they posted a link does not mean they're advertising. They've probably answered a similar question and thought that it would help.

To answer OP's question, Squid Game (and any other CG-breaking TV show/video game/book etc) can be mentioned (or have projects based on) in Scratch as long as the CG-breaking content is removed, for example, a Squid Game simulator may not be allowed, but a Squid Game Characters Dress-up project would be allowed.
TheQuackHouse
Scratcher
100+ posts

Squid Game

Closing the topic because I got my answer, and this topic is getting way too off-topic.

Powered by DjangoBB