Reev0102 wrote:

Support, this would help Scratchers get noticed.

NolanAwesome wrote:

Limit followers: (NS: 10) (S: 50) Does that sound good?

I don't think there should be a follow limit.

dertermenter wrote:

I’m not sure about the follower limit as someone who has more followers than that may still deserve more recognition. I think it should just be people that the ST think they contribute to the community a lot and deserve more recognition. There could even be a “learn more” button saying why that user was picked

MasterofTheBrick wrote:

The purpose of a follow limit is so that any featured individuals aren't too popular already, which basically goes back to square 1: Famous users get more attention, while the rest are left out.

Pianostar4 wrote:

While this does seem like a good suggestion, it might be hard to program.

magiccodegirl678 wrote:

I Half-Support. While this would be a good way for kind/helpful/underrated Scratchers to get noticed, I feel there would be a lot of this:

Random Person on Featured User's Profile wrote:

I saw you got featured. That will never happen to me.

Or:

Another Random Person wrote:

@SomePerson got featured! Why does the Scratch Team notice them, but not me?!?

That is the sort of negative attention it can bring. That can also happen with featured projects and studios, but I feel like more people would feel unnoticed/left out if the main focus was the user and not their projects/studios. But if they make really cool projects and aren't getting many views on them, or they are friendly and helpful in the community, then I do think there should be a way to feature users. So I Semi-Support this.

--Tears-- wrote:

Support! It would give New scratchers a bit of motivation! Maybe it could randomly choose a New scratcher with 1-50 followers and a scratcher with 1-30 followers each week, so the underrated scratchers could have a chance!

Reev0102 wrote:

--Tears-- wrote:

Support! It would give New scratchers a bit of motivation! Maybe it could randomly choose a New scratcher with 1-50 followers and a scratcher with 1-30 followers each week, so the underrated scratchers could have a chance!

Not every Scratcher with under 30 followers is good enough to be featured. Featured Scratchers should be personally hand-picked.

Reev0102 wrote:

MasterofTheBrick wrote:

The purpose of a follow limit is so that any featured individuals aren't too popular already, which basically goes back to square 1: Famous users get more attention, while the rest are left out.

I still don't think there should be a follow limit.

mitdk wrote:

Reev0102 wrote:

MasterofTheBrick wrote:

The purpose of a follow limit is so that any featured individuals aren't too popular already, which basically goes back to square 1: Famous users get more attention, while the rest are left out.

I still don't think there should be a follow limit.

Imagine this: griffpatch gets featured. He doesn't need it at all. he can get that attention himself

Quantum-Cat wrote:

I came from a duplicate topic. No Support Other users might get angry and argue that they also deserved to be on the featured scratchers row, as how good they are is mainly subjective.

Unithlees3 wrote:

Quantum-Cat wrote:

Quantum-Cat wrote:I came from a duplicate topic. No Support Other users might get angry and argue that they also deserved to be on the featured scratchers row, as how good they are is mainly subjective.

no support because the reason above