-_Rainsong_- wrote:

I've been on scratch for y e a rs (My oldest account, @warriorcatww being 4 years old).

Let's say this rule gets implemented. Imagine how many great studios get banned because of this.

Also, those studios don't want to become “Spam studios”, ya know, invite all your follower studios and what-not.

A lot of studios called ‘Best Scratchers’ or ‘Best Programmers’ only invite people with above 500 followers. What Codingfairy07 means is that studios shouldn't have a follow limit to join because a lot of times people very good at coding don't get invited because they only have 50 followers.

EatNYeet wrote:

It's like saying,“Oh, you made a full-on 3D game without any tutorials? Mmm, you only have 50 followers, so you're not as good as we are.”

Before inviting someone to a studio, they could check if the person's projects are good enough to be invited.

Reev0102 wrote:

-snip-

Before inviting someone to a studio, they could check if the person's projects are good enough to be invited.

Yep, instead of assuming that people are good just by having a lot of followers.

EatNYeet wrote:

azhua0730 wrote:

DO NOT USE CONSTRUCTIVE CRITISM

Stop with this whole getting rid of constructive criticism thing.

So does “disable constructive critism” mean kill all topics in the forums???
Are my ideas all gibberish?
Will I be known as “that constructive critism guy”?
Because my topics are nonsense, are you failing to understand me?
Do you think I'm nonsense?

azhua0730 wrote:

EatNYeet wrote:

azhua0730 wrote:

DO NOT USE CONSTRUCTIVE CRITISM

Stop with this whole getting rid of constructive criticism thing.

So does “disable constructive critism” mean kill all topics in the forums???
Are my ideas all gibberish?
Will I be known as “that constructive critism guy”?
Because my topics are nonsense, are you failing to understand me?
Do you think I'm nonsense?

We should reflect on our mistakes
–
op response
Semi-support, I think it's something to discriminate against but, sometimes it relatively harmless.

Support. My communist mind has been programmed to exterminate everything private.

azhua0730 wrote:

EatNYeet wrote:

azhua0730 wrote:

DO NOT USE CONSTRUCTIVE CRITISM

Stop with this whole getting rid of constructive criticism thing.

So does “disable constructive critism” mean kill all topics in the forums???
Are my ideas all gibberish?
Will I be known as “that constructive critism guy”?
Because my topics are nonsense, are you failing to understand me?
Do you think I'm nonsense?

1. Yup.
2. No.
3. Probably.
4. Yes. (lol, jk.)
5. No, not really.

To be constructive, I really don't see why the studios that discriminate by follower count aren't already banned. (Which I'm guessing that they may already be.) However, is it still discrimination when you have a follower amount condition for what you consider to be underrated scratchers?

EatNYeet wrote:

Reev0102 wrote:

-snip-

Before inviting someone to a studio, they could check if the person's projects are good enough to be invited.

Yep, instead of assuming that people are good just by having a lot of followers.

Yeah. I have seen a lot of overrated Scratchers (I'm not naming any) who have 1k+ followers because of F4F and follow requests but still get invited to ‘Best Scratchers’ studios.

DarthVader4Life wrote:

azhua0730 wrote:

EatNYeet wrote:

azhua0730 wrote:

DO NOT USE CONSTRUCTIVE CRITISM

Stop with this whole getting rid of constructive criticism thing.

So does “disable constructive critism” mean kill all topics in the forums???
Are my ideas all gibberish?
Will I be known as “that constructive critism guy”?
Because my topics are nonsense, are you failing to understand me?
Do you think I'm nonsense?

1. Yup.
2. No.
3. Probably.
4. Yes. (lol, jk.)
5. No, not really.

To be constructive, I really don't see why the studios that discriminate by follower count aren't already banned. (Which I'm guessing that they may already be.) However, is it still discrimination when you have a follower amount condition for what you consider to be underrated scratchers?

No, Underrated Scratchers Studios are fine, as long if they let anyone join and have no follower limit.. However, “Best Scratchers” Studios and studios that need Scratchers to have a high follower count to join are NOT okay.

GoboThePlant wrote:

azhua0730 wrote:

EatNYeet wrote:

azhua0730 wrote:

DO NOT USE CONSTRUCTIVE CRITISM

Stop with this whole getting rid of constructive criticism thing.

So does “disable constructive critism” mean kill all topics in the forums???
Are my ideas all gibberish?
Will I be known as “that constructive critism guy”?
Because my topics are nonsense, are you failing to understand me?
Do you think I'm nonsense?

We should reflect on our mistakes
–
op response
Semi-support, I think it's something to discriminate against but, sometimes it relatively harmless.

It is still SERIOUSLY unfair.

azhua0730 wrote:

EatNYeet wrote:

azhua0730 wrote:

DO NOT USE CONSTRUCTIVE CRITISM

Stop with this whole getting rid of constructive criticism thing.

So does “disable constructive critism” mean kill all topics in the forums???
Are my ideas all gibberish?
Will I be known as “that constructive critism guy”?
Because my topics are nonsense, are you failing to understand me?
Do you think I'm nonsense?

1. Yes.
2. No, but some of your suggestions simply don't benefit Scratch.
3. Possibly.
4. It's not that I don't understand you, but you're trying to enforce a suggestion that wasn't accepted. By saying constructive criticism should be stopped, you're essentially encouraging just saying “support” or “no support” without a reason.
5. No. The only “nonsense” is the fact that you want to “disable” constructive criticism.

Bump moment

EatNYeet wrote:

Bump moment

Isn't this topic kind of inactive? Or are you trying to get more topic activity?

Codingfairy07 wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

-snip-

To be constructive, I really don't see why the studios that discriminate by follower count aren't already banned. (Which I'm guessing that they may already be.) However, is it still discrimination when you have a follower amount condition for what you consider to be underrated scratchers?

No, Underrated Scratchers Studios are fine, as long if they let anyone join. However, “Best Scratchers” Studios and studios that need Scratchers to have a high follower count to join are NOT okay.

Isn't the suggestion to ban studios that have follower requirements? Underrated Scratcher studios are fine, yes, but under the current title, and OP… said studios would also be affected.

DarthVader4Life wrote:

Codingfairy07 wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

-snip-

To be constructive, I really don't see why the studios that discriminate by follower count aren't already banned. (Which I'm guessing that they may already be.) However, is it still discrimination when you have a follower amount condition for what you consider to be underrated scratchers?

No, Underrated Scratchers Studios are fine, as long if they let anyone join. However, “Best Scratchers” Studios and studios that need Scratchers to have a high follower count to join are NOT okay.

Isn't the suggestion to ban studios that have follower requirements? Underrated Scratcher studios are fine, yes, but under the current title, and OP… said studios would also be affected.

I'm talking about studios that have a follower limit to join, if they let famous scratchers join and interact, its fine.

I support because they unfairly divide up the community, but would a studio that only let people with a certain amount of followers or less still be allowed?

ScratchCat1038 wrote:

I support because they unfairly divide up the community, but would a studio that only let people with a certain amount of followers or less still be allowed?

No. That still counts as discrimination.

Codingfairy07 wrote:

EatNYeet wrote:

Bump moment

Isn't this topic kind of inactive? Or are you trying to get more topic activity?

More activity

Codingfairy07 wrote:

ScratchCat1038 wrote:

I support because they unfairly divide up the community, but would a studio that only let people with a certain amount of followers or less still be allowed?

No. That still counts as discrimination.

Okay.

EatNYeet wrote:

Reev0102 wrote:

-snip-

Before inviting someone to a studio, they could check if the person's projects are good enough to be invited.

Yep, instead of assuming that people are good just by having a lot of followers.

I’m literally almost at 150, and hearing studios like this, *cencored*

azhua0730 wrote:

EatNYeet wrote:

azhua0730 wrote:

DO NOT USE CONSTRUCTIVE CRITISM

Stop with this whole getting rid of constructive criticism thing.

So does “disable constructive critism” mean kill all topics in the forums???
Are my ideas all gibberish?
Will I be known as “that constructive critism guy”?
Because my topics are nonsense, are you failing to understand me?
Do you think I'm nonsense?

1. Kinda -_-
2. no
3. Probably :r
4. I failed as a person
5. No
———————————————————
OP :: Support, I hate discrimination