DarthVader4Life wrote:

fdreerf wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

-snip-

The boolean blocks are unnecessary since you can just plug the reporter into the preexisting boolean comparison blocks. Frankly, this procedure isn't used very often and the workaround is a matter of going through all of the letters and see if they match or not.

Well, since the workaround is rather long, we should at least have the reporter.

Should we then add every long script as a block then, regardless of how useful it is?

This isn't useful enough to warrant being a “standard” block. Make it a custom block

No support, that block is an overly complicated mess that won't help anyone. You can live without it.

What would make strings similar?

fdreerf wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

fdreerf wrote:

DarthVader4Life wrote:

-snip-

The boolean blocks are unnecessary since you can just plug the reporter into the preexisting boolean comparison blocks. Frankly, this procedure isn't used very often and the workaround is a matter of going through all of the letters and see if they match or not.

Well, since the workaround is rather long, we should at least have the reporter.

Should we then add every long script as a block then, regardless of how useful it is?

[j] Yes!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! [/j]
But in all seriousness, your sarcasm is noted. My reasoning is flawed, but I still want the reporter, if any of the suggested blocks were to be implemented.

no support

mumu245 wrote:

no support

Please be constructive and state why you don’t support.

Bai