Bump yet again; I don't know WHAT page it is on, but definitely not the first

Another bump?

I'm changing to no support. I just saw that there is an extension for the ctr+f, so no need for the ST to waste their time making something that is already there.

mmnagelia wrote:

I'm changing to no support. I just saw that there is an extension for the ctr+f, so no need for the ST to waste their time making something that is already there.

Yeah, about that. Try doing Ctrl+F in a really big project (3k blocks). How would you find the block that you need? The screen camera does not pan over to where the block is.

I think I'm going to change the title to “Improve Ctrl+F in the Scratch Project Editor.”

dimayajonelcid wrote:

mmnagelia wrote:

I'm changing to no support. I just saw that there is an extension for the ctr+f, so no need for the ST to waste their time making something that is already there.

Yeah, about that. Try doing Ctrl+F in a really big project (3k blocks). How would you find the block that you need? The screen camera does not pan over to where the block is.

I think I'm going to change the title to “Improve Ctrl+F in the Scratch Project Editor.”

Sure, but give more reasons how you're going to improve it.

mmnagelia wrote:

dimayajonelcid wrote:

mmnagelia wrote:

I'm changing to no support. I just saw that there is an extension for the ctr+f, so no need for the ST to waste their time making something that is already there.

Yeah, about that. Try doing Ctrl+F in a really big project (3k blocks). How would you find the block that you need? The screen camera does not pan over to where the block is.

I think I'm going to change the title to “Improve Ctrl+F in the Scratch Project Editor.”

Sure, but give more reasons how you're going to improve it.

… And now I kinda regret making this topic!

mmnagelia wrote:

I'm changing to no support. I just saw that there is an extension for the ctr+f, so no need for the ST to waste their time making something that is already there.

Then mention that extension. Oh wait, you can't. There's a rule against that. Therefore, there will be people who don't know what extension or that the extension even exists. Still a reason for no support?

PkmnQ wrote:

mmnagelia wrote:

I'm changing to no support. I just saw that there is an extension for the ctr+f, so no need for the ST to waste their time making something that is already there.

Then mention that extension. Oh wait, you can't. There's a rule against that. Therefore, there will be people who don't know what extension or that the extension even exists. Still a reason for no support?

Mhm, yeah that rule does exist. I'm not sure, maybe the ST could make a Ctr+F built-in, but I'm not completely sure that the ST will actually do it.

mmnagelia wrote:

PkmnQ wrote:

mmnagelia wrote:

I'm changing to no support. I just saw that there is an extension for the ctr+f, so no need for the ST to waste their time making something that is already there.

Then mention that extension. Oh wait, you can't. There's a rule against that. Therefore, there will be people who don't know what extension or that the extension even exists. Still a reason for no support?

Mhm, yeah that rule does exist. I'm not sure, maybe the ST could make a Ctr+F built-in, but I'm not completely sure that the ST will actually do it.

Yeah, about that. The chance of doing so isn't very big, but this WILL benefit nerfing big projects to make them easier, or otherwise finding scripts in a complicated project.

POV: You're bumping after 4 days

Bump, yet again

I'm back, after a week. bump

4th bump between non-owner posts…

This is a test bump to see if forum posts work after the servers temporarily went down. Thank you.

It's time I revived this post.

dimayajonelcid wrote:

mmnagelia wrote:

PkmnQ wrote:

mmnagelia wrote:

I'm changing to no support. I just saw that there is an extension for the ctr+f, so no need for the ST to waste their time making something that is already there.

Then mention that extension. Oh wait, you can't. There's a rule against that. Therefore, there will be people who don't know what extension or that the extension even exists. Still a reason for no support?

Mhm, yeah that rule does exist. I'm not sure, maybe the ST could make a Ctr+F built-in, but I'm not completely sure that the ST will actually do it.

Yeah, about that. The chance of doing so isn't very big, but this WILL benefit nerfing big projects to make them easier, or otherwise finding scripts in a complicated project.

Most schools and districts now block extensions too.
Right now I'm need this because I'm looking for a variable script, and the code is long.

Bump