Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
- » Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
- sugarglidertotten
-
Scratcher
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Current Millisecond is a duplicate.Thanks for telling me
- BarelySmooth
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
This wouldn't be feasible at all. There are no practical uses for a nanosecond for Scratch Projects
- Ankit_Anmol
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Millisecond? Ok… nano and micro??????? IS THIS A JOKE?
- builderluke
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
why micro- and nanoseconds? aren't they kinda small
- sugarglidertotten
-
Scratcher
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
I vote that there should be a current millisecond, microsecond, nanosecond, even if not many people need it it’s not gonna do any harm just to be a block. I like to build a lot of clock things or timers and for milliseconds, microseconds, nanosecond. it would be easier to have current milli, micro and nano seconds then days since 2000 * 86400000 mod 1000. I spent hours browsing the internet for a code for these timings and I found the millisecond discussion and thought it should be a thing. Also Macie 1234 for the code script I actually found in the discussion. 100% full support. Even if no one uses it, it doesn’t do any harm does it? Just to have extra?
-sugarglidertotten
-sugarglidertotten
- lovecodeabc
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
I vote that there should be a current millisecond, microsecond, nanosecond, even if not many people need it it’s not gonna do any harm just to be a block. I like to build a lot of clock things or timers and for milliseconds, microseconds, nanosecond. it would be easier to have current milli, micro and nano seconds then days since 2000 * 86400000 mod 1000. I spent hours browsing the internet for a code for these timings and I found the millisecond discussion and thought it should be a thing. Also Macie 1234 for the code script I actually found in the discussion. 100% full support. Even if no one uses it, it doesn’t do any harm does it? Just to have extra?Well, microsecond would be TOTALLY inaccurate since HPCs (High Precision Clocks) are about 22,500 miles above Earth in geosyncronous orbit, and about time delay being about 5 seconds..
-sugarglidertotten
Nanoseconds will totally blind you
Support for milliseconds tho.
- sugarglidertotten
-
Scratcher
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Okay I get your point my main argument is for milliseconds micro and nano is reasonable but millisecond totally needs to be a thing
- sugarglidertotten
-
Scratcher
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Even if not many people need it it’s not gonna do any harm just to be a block.
- sugarglidertotten
-
Scratcher
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
(current [millisecond v])
- sugarglidertotten
-
Scratcher
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
when green flag clicked
say (current [millisecond v]) for (2) secs
- sugarglidertotten
-
Scratcher
33 posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Why is because those are my accounts too I have multipleAgreeI agree
Please say why
- airplanedodge
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Hah. using you own accts to get supporters?Why is because those are my accounts too I have multipleAgreeI agree
Please say why
sorry for being a bit harsh
Last edited by airplanedodge (April 28, 2021 13:26:08)
- 7salad3salad
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
Anyways, no support. i just dont think that they would be useful (maybe millisecond but)
Anyway, a milisecond is a duplicate, credit to @wvj for pointing that out above.And since wvj already said it, you didn't have to.
- Discussion Forums
- » Suggestions
-
» Current Millisecond,Microsecond and Nanosecond
















