jwgs idea is good, but with bot vision technology, they could scan the image above and develop an image and then look for that same image, if you get what I mean. But if the bottom shape was a different variation of triangle, then it would work. Or you could say, for websites that aren't for little kids, “select the shape with the same number of vertices”, or sides, and then do slightly different shape variations. Hopefully that makes sense

I support. Spambots are horrible. Just a few days ago I found a spambot advertising someone's Reddit page.

I don't see spambots that much, so I don't really see the point of this suggestion.

TopicBumper wrote:

Bump.

I'm getting desperate, I'm tired of marking suggestions as “TLD” (too little discussion). I've marked 274 topics as such.

Please don't reply to topics that were from a few years ago and are inactive! It confuses people!

cs4715962 wrote:

Please don't reply to topics that were from a few years ago and are inactive! It confuses people!

Even during my short period of time while I was here, I still have people not understand what a bump is.

Ihatr wrote:

I don't see spambots that much, so I don't really see the point of this suggestion.

Many users are reporting spambots in the forums whatsoever. For example, here a Scratcher admits that they have created one. They exist, and they shouldn't. This site is to introduce into coding and educational purposes. A bot, however, could have been created for reasons that have nothing to do with either coding or educational purposes. They may do inappropriate things, or be created to have more follows. Also, the fact that they exist makes the suggestion have to be implemented.
I suggest a human verification system that would do something that looks like the ones listed above. So, it would write something like this:
Which of the following is the (adjective inserted here)est?
And it would show three things that could be described by this adjective. It would be an adjective easy enough to understand.

cs4715962 wrote:

TopicBumper wrote:

Bump.

I'm getting desperate, I'm tired of marking suggestions as “TLD” (too little discussion). I've marked 274 topics as such.

Please don't reply to topics that were from a few years ago and are inactive! It confuses people!

There is no such thing as a necropost in the suggetsions forum! How many times do I have to say that!

Bringing this topic up and Support because this will help stop the bots