Discuss Scratch

509robotic
Scratcher
100+ posts

Easier status bars

Rendangbike2 wrote:

509robotic wrote:

Futurebot5 wrote:

No support. This is too prebuilt, you learn more by making it yourself.
scratch is for begginers and is suppost to make it easier for them to learn how to code. I was new to scratch ocnce upon a time, and IK it was way too hard. I'm pretty sure ST wants it to be begginer-friendly.
But this is not related to coding.
I'm 99% percent sure it is.
TopCode
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Easier status bars

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

No support, Scratch is about coding, not games.
and coding is about making games.

alright im retracting my support now, if that's all you think of coding you need to learn more about coding.

Last edited by TopCode (Feb. 25, 2021 16:56:09)

Rendangbike2
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Easier status bars

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

No support, Scratch is about coding, not games.
and coding is about making games.
No it isn't, have you ever heard about websites, algorithm and cryptography? They also use coding.
509robotic
Scratcher
100+ posts

Easier status bars

GoogleInScratch wrote:

No support. You could just use variables.
With this, it would be too easy to make stuff like that.
not too easy. this is suppost to be a begginer-friendly coding platform. it just takes up space to use variables and using variables; do you know how bad that looks??
509robotic
Scratcher
100+ posts

Easier status bars

Rendangbike2 wrote:

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

No support, Scratch is about coding, not games.
and coding is about making games.
No it isn't, have you ever heard about websites, algorithm and cryptography? They also use coding.
oh, IK, but I also know that a lot of people like making games to. I'm not saying 99% of earth likes making games.
509robotic
Scratcher
100+ posts

Easier status bars

Plz stop replying to this thread. I thought I had a good suggestion, and got hate in return. I repeat, please stop replying to this thread.
Rendangbike2
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Easier status bars

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

No support, Scratch is about coding, not games.
and coding is about making games.
No it isn't, have you ever heard about websites, algorithm and cryptography? They also use coding.
oh, IK, but I also know that a lot of people like making games to. I'm not saying 99% of earth likes making games.
And?
509robotic
Scratcher
100+ posts

Easier status bars

Rendangbike2 wrote:

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

No support, Scratch is about coding, not games.
and coding is about making games.
No it isn't, have you ever heard about websites, algorithm and cryptography? They also use coding.
oh, IK, but I also know that a lot of people like making games to. I'm not saying 99% of earth likes making games.
And?
And what? like I said, plz stop replying to this thread.
TopCode
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Easier status bars

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

No support, Scratch is about coding, not games.
and coding is about making games.
No it isn't, have you ever heard about websites, algorithm and cryptography? They also use coding.
oh, IK, but I also know that a lot of people like making games to. I'm not saying 99% of earth likes making games.

you have a very warped perception of reality
509robotic
Scratcher
100+ posts

Easier status bars

TopCode wrote:

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

No support, Scratch is about coding, not games.
and coding is about making games.
No it isn't, have you ever heard about websites, algorithm and cryptography? They also use coding.
oh, IK, but I also know that a lot of people like making games to. I'm not saying 99% of earth likes making games.

you have a very warped perception of reality
not only do I have to say 500 times that i want people to stop replying to this thread, anyone notice how much your making me angry? you could even say I'm *
509robotic
Scratcher
100+ posts

Easier status bars

TopCode wrote:

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

No support, Scratch is about coding, not games.
and coding is about making games.
No it isn't, have you ever heard about websites, algorithm and cryptography? They also use coding.
oh, IK, but I also know that a lot of people like making games to. I'm not saying 99% of earth likes making games.

you have a very warped perception of reality
How?
TopCode
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Easier status bars

your assumption everyone wants to use code to make games is wrong
DangerousDawn
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Easier status bars

509robotic wrote:

Rendangbike2 wrote:

No support, Scratch is about coding, not games.
and coding is about making games.
Wrong!!! Sites are coded, Search engines are coded, Mobile Devices are coded. Not just games.

Last edited by DangerousDawn (Feb. 25, 2021 18:10:25)

509robotic
Scratcher
100+ posts

Easier status bars

TopCode wrote:

your assumption everyone wants to use code to make games is wrong
hey! I speciffically said that I'm NOT saying that 99% of people want to use code. but some do.
the2000
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Easier status bars

TopCode wrote:

509robotic wrote:

and coding is about making games.
alright im retracting my support now, if that's all you think of coding you need to learn more about coding.
Are you seriously that hung up over a slightly poor wording choice? Coding is about making games, among other things. But because the creator of this thread made a somewhat poorly explained argument, you now have to “retract your support”, whatever that means?

edit: correction

Last edited by the2000 (Feb. 25, 2021 23:36:53)

--Explosion--
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Easier status bars

A workaround to this is to make a program which uses these characters:
█ and ░
to display a variable in large readout mode:
define progress (percent)
set [output v] to [0]
repeat (percent)
set [output v] to (join (output) [█]
end
repeat ((100)-(percent))
set [output v] to (join (output) [░]
end
set [output v] to (join (output) (join [ ] (join ([ceil v] of (percent)::operators)[%])

Last edited by --Explosion-- (Feb. 25, 2021 23:43:08)

the2000
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Easier status bars

--Explosion-- wrote:

A workaround to this is to make a program which uses these characters:
█ and ░
to display a variable in large readout mode:
-snip-
Wow, that's actually pretty clever! I don't think I ever would've thought of that. You lose 1 point for not closing your Scratchblocks tag, though…
TopCode
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Easier status bars

the2000 wrote:

TopCode wrote:

509robotic wrote:

and coding is about making games.
alright im retracting my support now, if that's all you think of coding you need to learn more about coding.
Are you seriously that hung up over a slightly poor wording choice? Coding is about making games, among other things. But because the creator of this thread made a somewhat poorly explained argument, you now have to “retract your support”, whatever that means?

edit: correction

because the user has revealed they only care how its beneficial to games, which i dont support.
lordibel
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Easier status bars

No support. This seems so specific; games. This would be absolutely useless for other types of projects. Given this, this seems unrealistic that the ST will add this.
fdreerf
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Easier status bars

lordibel wrote:

No support. This seems so specific; games. This would be absolutely useless for other types of projects. Given this, this seems unrealistic that the ST will add this.
I don't think this user needs another person berating them for their suggestion. They already understand that not many people like this idea and they are very much upset.

Last edited by fdreerf (Feb. 26, 2021 03:57:20)

Powered by DjangoBB