A Way to Reduce Rejected Suggestions! [Filter title and direct to TOLORS]

Prime689

the2000 wrote:
Prime689 wrote:
Hmm… there are variations that users can use to dupe the filterbot, alas, trespassing the filterbot will heed no sense to this being implemented.
What? Does that really matter? The entire point is just that it will casually tell users if there's a chance their idea could be rejected. It's not a “filter” and there's no point in trying to circumvent it. I think you need to read the suggestion thoroughly before responding.

I read the OP, so I made a thought. Is there any problem following that?

dertermenter

dhfbei8987 wrote:
No support, it could waste even more resources; also, the filter bot may keyword incorrect suggestions.

Any suggestion takes some recourses so you can no support every suggestion saying that. This is easy to implement. If you are sure that it isn’t rejected, they can still submit it.

the2000

Prime689 wrote:
the2000 wrote:
Prime689 wrote:
Hmm… there are variations that users can use to dupe the filterbot, alas, trespassing the filterbot will heed no sense to this being implemented.
What? Does that really matter? The entire point is just that it will casually tell users if there's a chance their idea could be rejected. It's not a “filter” and there's no point in trying to circumvent it. I think you need to read the suggestion thoroughly before responding.
I read the OP, so I made a thought. Is there any problem following that?

The fact that your “thought” makes no sense? This is proposing a keyword detector designed to help potentially confused users who are new to the Suggestions forum. It's not supposed to block spam, it's just supposed to helpfully inform you, “Hey, I think your suggestion might be rejected, so read this and make sure it isn't before posting.” If they know they're suggesting something rejected then this system isn't supposed to do anything to stop them because that's not a very common problem.

gosoccerboy5

I think such a keyword detector has the potential to be unreliable, so maybe on the first few suggestions you make, it will indiscriminately show a popup telling you about TOLORS. That'd be helpful.

the2000

gosoccerboy5 wrote:
I think such a keyword detector has the potential to be unreliable, so maybe on the first few suggestions you make, it will indiscriminately show a popup telling you about TOLORS. That'd be helpful.

Again, it doesn't need to be fool-proof. As long as this stops some accidental rejecduping it would be a welcome addition in my book.

Last edited by the2000 (Feb. 23, 2021 18:11:31)

cruncherBones

It does not need to be perfect. BUMP

1Oaktree2

Could be quite useful for New Forumers who don't think to read the TOLORS.

PGBFLITE6373

Support useful and could prevent rejected topics (I hate those)

lovecodeabc

the2000 wrote:
gosoccerboy5 wrote:
I think such a keyword detector has the potential to be unreliable, so maybe on the first few suggestions you make, it will indiscriminately show a popup telling you about TOLORS. That'd be helpful.
Again, it doesn't need to be fool-proof. As long as this stops some accidental rejecduping it would be a welcome addition in my book.

NOW FIX YOUR SPELLING lol
duh, this probably won't work
WORKAROUND LIST:
Money blocks = Money [b][/b]block[s][/s]s
like that..

Last edited by lovecodeabc (Feb. 24, 2021 14:27:20)

the2000

lovecodeabc wrote:
the2000 wrote:
Again, it doesn't need to be fool-proof. As long as this stops some accidental rejecduping it would be a welcome addition in my book.
NOW FIX YOUR SPELLING lol
duh, this probably won't work
WORKAROUND LIST:
Money blocks = Money [b][/b]block[s][/s]s
like that..

…Did you even read my post? It's not a “filter” or something, it's just supposed to warn users who might accidentally suggest something rejected! I'm tired of repeating this explanation just because people didn't read the OP…

dertermenter

cruncherBones wrote:
It does not need to be perfect. BUMP

Thanks!
Bump

dertermenter

bump bump bump gotta wait 60 secs so a few more bump bump

bump

Bacteria999

Support, it would make room for more suggestions that were never suggested. Additionally, I think there should also be a system that recommends several topics similar to what you are writing, in order to prevent duplicates.

dertermenter

lovecodeabc wrote:
the2000 wrote:
gosoccerboy5 wrote:
I think such a keyword detector has the potential to be unreliable, so maybe on the first few suggestions you make, it will indiscriminately show a popup telling you about TOLORS. That'd be helpful.
Again, it doesn't need to be fool-proof. As long as this stops some accidental rejecduping it would be a welcome addition in my book.
NOW FIX YOUR SPELLING lol
duh, this probably won't work
WORKAROUND LIST:
Money blocks = Money [b][/b]block[s][/s]s
like that..

New forumers wouldn't know how to work around the filter

misteray

I support. Would be nice to not have to see a new scratcher get flamed because they didn't read tolors

cruncherBones

bump

Prime689 wrote:
Hmm… there are variations that users can use to dupe the filterbot, alas, trespassing the filterbot will heed no sense to this being implemented.
king of the page

A new user wouldn't pass the filter to have a rejected suggestion.

bobcat0701

bump

PATSATDAT

Support because it would cause less spam from people making topics that are rejected

cruncherBones

bobcat0701 wrote:
bump

dudemanwest

support

Discuss Scratch