When you do not title a project, it will be called untitled 1,2,3 etc. However, for me, this name just….. doesn't fit. And I think there needs to be a new default project name

I think instead of calling unnamed projects: Untitled 1, untitled 2 etc
It should be Project 1, project 2 etc

this is why this simple change will be beneficial to scratch:
It sounds better then untitled. This is because it is simpler. People are also more likely to use this default name than the previous.
Also helps if scratchers want to number their projects. No one will number their projects using the untilted default.

Hope you like my suggestion and put it into scratch!!

I mean it would make total sense because its a project. So Semi-support because I don't know yet.

Support, but could be 2 ways this could work.

maybe if you do not name a project, it will be called project
so if I made my 100th project, and did not name it, it will be called project 100

or you could do it the way it works now, so if I released my 100th project and it was 2nd with no title, it would be called project 2

either way works, good suggestion, but who likes my little change?

cruncherBones wrote:

Support, but could be 2 ways this could work.

maybe if you do not name a project, it will be called project
so if I made my 100th project, and did not name it, it will be called project 100

or you could do it the way it works now, so if I released my 100th project and it was 2nd with no title, it would be called project 2

either way works, good suggestion, but who likes my little change?

Yeah that could work also.

T

cruncherBones wrote:

Support, but could be 2 ways this could work.

maybe if you do not name a project, it will be called project
so if I made my 100th project, and did not name it, it will be called project 100

or you could do it the way it works now, so if I released my 100th project and it was 2nd with no title, it would be called project 2

either way works, good suggestion, but who likes my little change?

That could work is well, but maybe extra coding for the scratch team. It will be easier to code with my version, since you only change the name, the code will be the same.

No support, the Untitled Project name allows for you to think of what you want the project to be, also

cruncherBones wrote:

I released my 100th project and it was 2nd with no title, it would be called project 2

That could confuse users.

dertermenter wrote:

-snip-
That could work is well, but maybe extra coding for the scratch team. It will be easier to code with my version, since you only change the name, the code will be the same.

This version of how she wants it to be is actually easier, since it changing the name and not anything else.

GachaN0nsense wrote:

No support, the Untitled Project name allows for you to think of what you want the project to be, also

cruncherBones wrote:

I released my 100th project and it was 2nd with no title, it would be called project 2

That could confuse users.

True, but with my suggestion, project 1 etc sounds a lot better than untitled so more people would see it.
Also, it is easier to number projects.

GachaN0nsense wrote:

No support, the Untitled Project name allows for you to think of what you want the project to be, also

cruncherBones wrote:

I released my 100th project and it was 2nd with no title, it would be called project 2

That could confuse users.

Plus, that is the way it works now, so why no support?
Do you think it should stay as the odd-sounding ‘untitled’ or should be changed?

Tunde123 wrote:

dertermenter wrote:

-snip-
That could work is well, but maybe extra coding for the scratch team. It will be easier to code with my version, since you only change the name, the code will be the same.

This version of how she wants it to be is actually easier since it changing the name and not anything else.

No, because with my version, the system works the same.
but with cruncherbones 1st suggestion, it is a different method numbering projects, so new code will be implemented.

dertermenter wrote:

Tunde123 wrote:

dertermenter wrote:

-snip-
That could work is well, but maybe extra coding for the scratch team. It will be easier to code with my version, since you only change the name, the code will be the same.

This version of how she wants it to be is actually easier since it changing the name and not anything else.

No, because with my version, the system works the same.
but with cruncherbones 1st suggestion, it is a different method numbering projects, so new code will be implemented.

Its still kind of the same code though. But your right, it would need a new code.

Untitled projects are called Untitled because
1. They aren't shared
2. They don't really have a name so thats why its called Untitled

GachaN0nsense wrote:

No support, the Untitled Project name allows for you to think of what you want the project to be, also

cruncherBones wrote:

I released my 100th project and it was 2nd with no title, it would be called project 2

That could confuse users.

Mabye not my 2nd suggestion then.
But with my 1st, I do not think calling it ‘untitled’ will increase impact to name changing than project ___

I support as If a user does NOT want to name a project it is easier to number. And sounds clearer.

GachaN0nsense wrote:

Untitled projects are called Untitled because
1. They aren't shared
2. They don't really have a name so thats why its called Untitled

1. They can be shared, and if they were, project ___ could attract more attention as it is a clearer name.
2. And project ____ does not really have a name either but is clearer!

support, it is so much clearer, the untitled name does not sound right.

GachaN0nsense wrote:

No support, the Untitled Project name allows for you to think of what you want the project to be, also

cruncherBones wrote:

I released my 100th project and it was 2nd with no title, it would be called project 2

That could confuse users.

Yes, it is, but…. That is the way it works right now!
So do @dertermenter 's original verision!
Just think it is a bit hypocritical.

SUPPORT

Thanks for support everyone, but please still be respectful, getting a bit heated here!

support!!!!



Just like you said, people like to ‘number’ projects

but I can not do it with that dumb untitled name!
This is clearer, easier, more beneficial etc.

cruncherBones wrote:

Support, but could be 2 ways this could work.

maybe if you do not name a project, it will be called project
so if I made my 100th project, and did not name it, it will be called project 100

or you could do it the way it works now, so if I released my 100th project and it was 2nd with no title, it would be called project 2

either way works, good suggestion, but who likes my little change?

good suggestions, but I like the original one better tbh. No offence m8

GachaN0nsense wrote:

No support, the Untitled Project name allows for you to think of what you want the project to be, also

cruncherBones wrote:

I released my 100th project and it was 2nd with no title, it would be called project 2

That could confuse users.

I do support, but yes, the variant is confusing.