([ tan] of (90))

TheLogFather wrote:

You might want to read this…
http://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/39873/
(In particular, my first reply.)

QuantumPixel wrote:

([ tan]of(90))

([tan v]of(90))

DevanWolf wrote:

QuantumPixel wrote:

([ tan]of(90))

Correction:

([tan v]of(90))

See. You just don't need to add the extra space at the start of “tan”, and just add the dropdown look by adding a “v” near the end of “tan”!

QuantumPixel wrote:

In the Scratch editor,

([ tan] of (90))

is defined as a very large number. This is not true, as tan 90 is sin90/cos90, which is a singularity.
The ratio for tan 90 is also faulty. Because tan in the right triangle is opposite theta / adjacent theta, and if theta is ninety, the third angle (adjacent) would be 0, and you can't divide by 0.

Serbian_Developer wrote:

…Hmm…
i Think that if

([ tan v] of (90))

is not defined as a ‘'very large number’' there would be some cases where we couldn't use this glitch for something else
like idk maybe to count the time spent on to doing something in that project or whatever..
And how (removed by moderator - please keep it polite) could you make a triangle that his adjacent is 0!?
i Don't really get it…