Blaze349 wrote:

djdolphin wrote:

ExtremeLogic wrote:

Who learns java script by looking at it?

Me

Me.

ExtremeLogic wrote:

djdolphin wrote:

ExtremeLogic wrote:

Who learns java script by looking at it?

Me

Ok. Would you find it interesting enough to be looking at it for months?
If yes, think about other people. There are people who really care about the code (very few), and there are people who don't even care what the code even looks like (many) and also because they can't even edit it.
If no, then whatever.

Yes.

VoltageGames wrote:

ExtremeLogic wrote:

Who learns java script by looking at it?

Me.
1. check out the javaScript version move 10 steps
2. write down in a document the javaScript version of move ten steps
3. repeat steps 1-2 with all the blocks you want indefinitely
4. write up a javaScript game with your new knowledge.

I know right.

Think about all 1 million Scratch users. Would most of them think the same?

djdolphin wrote:

ExtremeLogic wrote:

Who learns java script by looking at it?

Me

Me
(although I don't support for the other two)

ExtremeLogic wrote:

Blaze349 wrote:

djdolphin wrote:

ExtremeLogic wrote:

Who learns java script by looking at it?

Me

Me.

ExtremeLogic wrote:

djdolphin wrote:

ExtremeLogic wrote:

Who learns java script by looking at it?

Me

Ok. Would you find it interesting enough to be looking at it for months?
If yes, think about other people. There are people who really care about the code (very few), and there are people who don't even care what the code even looks like (many) and also because they can't even edit it.
If no, then whatever.

Yes.

VoltageGames wrote:

ExtremeLogic wrote:

Who learns java script by looking at it?

Me.
1. check out the javaScript version move 10 steps
2. write down in a document the javaScript version of move ten steps
3. repeat steps 1-2 with all the blocks you want indefinitely
4. write up a javaScript game with your new knowledge.

I know right.

Think about all 1 million Scratch users. Would most of them think the same?

Maybe not most, but I'd say there's enough. And it's not like anyone would be particularly against it. I mean, they may consider it a waste of time and resources, but I don't think anyone would consider it an overly negative idea ignoring those two constraints.

Scratch would have to add something to translate itself to JS, which would be really hard considering you'd need a canvas, objects, events, everything in the same place, etc…

Well, yes, that's a valid concern.