Ham19-01-2011 wrote:

Hi, I have a suggestion, that would add to it.
There would be a list called troublemakers and the owner would be the only one who could edit it. The owner could add someone's name to it. And if someone attempts to invite them, they wouldn't be able to! Only the owner could remove people's names too.

Also, I think the “Restore projects” and “Restore curators” buttons should only be available to owners instead of managers.

Anyways, Support!

Illusion705 wrote:

JPOWERPUFFGIRLS wrote:

Support, this is similar to an idea I had

Thanks for the support! Could you talk a little bit about why you support? It helps the suggestion if people say why they support so that the Scratch Team knows why we want it added.

JPOWERPUFFGIRLS wrote:

Ham19-01-2011 wrote:

Illusion705 wrote:

Don't quote long OP

Hi, support! But I have a suggestion, that would add to it.
There would be a list called troublemakers and the owner would be the only one who could edit it. The owner could add someone's name to it. And if someone attempts to invite them, they wouldn't be able to! Only the owner could remove people's names too.

Good idea, this was going to be a suggestion I would make but you beat me to it. The troublemakers list would only be viewable by the owner to prevent naming and shaming, unlike in studio description where they say ‘DO NOT INVITE- <insert troublemakers name here>’

Ham19-01-2011 wrote:

JPOWERPUFFGIRLS wrote:

Ham19-01-2011 wrote:

Illusion705 wrote:

Don't quote long OP

Hi, support! But I have a suggestion, that would add to it.
There would be a list called troublemakers and the owner would be the only one who could edit it. The owner could add someone's name to it. And if someone attempts to invite them, they wouldn't be able to! Only the owner could remove people's names too.

Good idea, this was going to be a suggestion I would make but you beat me to it. The troublemakers list would only be viewable by the owner to prevent naming and shaming, unlike in studio description where they say ‘DO NOT INVITE- <insert troublemakers name here>’

Oh, yes, it should only be visible to the owner and cannot be used by New Scratchers in case they are a spammer and put almost the whole community's usernames in it.

Ham19-01-2011 wrote:

snip]

Basic88 wrote:

Support! This could help restore raided studios. I would like one thing to be amended though:
Where it says “x restored x project(s) removed by x” I think “removed by x” should be removed from the sentence because that's naming and shaming. It already says “x removed project x” anyway.

Vibrato wrote:

Ham19-01-2011 wrote:

Hi, I have a suggestion, that would add to it.
There would be a list called troublemakers and the owner would be the only one who could edit it. The owner could add someone's name to it. And if someone attempts to invite them, they wouldn't be able to! Only the owner could remove people's names too.

Also, I think the “Restore projects” and “Restore curators” buttons should only be available to owners instead of managers.

Anyways, Support!

question: what if the owner leaves? I co-run a studio because the original owner left. Who would get the list?

Ham19-01-2011 wrote:

Illusion705 wrote:

Restoring Curators and Projects

It can be really annoying when someone removes all of the projects and curators from one of your studios, but I have a suggestion that will make adding these projects and curators back a lot easier!

Note: By curators I mean curators and managers.

My suggestion is to add two buttons on the activity tab which could be used by managers. One says “Restore curators”, and the other says “Restore projects”. Here's what this could look like:

Restore Curators: This button would require the manager to enter a starting and ending time and date of which the curators were removed and who they were removed by. To make sure that a manager can't add back a ton of curators from a really long time ago, they can only add back curators that were removed 24 hours or less ago. This button will also not add back curators that were removed by themselves for two reasons:

1- to make sure that they aren't inviting back people that don't want to curate using this button
2- to make sure that the person who messed up the studio isn't invited back if they removed them self

Restore Projects: This button would work exactly like the “Restore curators” button except it would add projects back instead of curators.

Let me know what you think of this idea and how it can be improved. Thanks :)

Supporters:
@Burgher1679
@Illusion705
@JPOWERPUFFGIRLS
@LydzWinry

Semi Supporters:
@Bluebatstar
@Yeetoburro1

Non Supporters:
@FloatingMuffins

Hi, I have a suggestion, that would add to it.
There would be a list called troublemakers and the owner would be the only one who could edit it. The owner could add someone's name to it. And if someone attempts to invite them, they wouldn't be able to! Only the owner could remove people's names too. New Scratchers wouldn't be allowed to use it in case they are a spammer and add Scratchers who tried to report the spammer for the bad things the spammer has done to the Troublemakers list.

Also, I think the “Restore projects” and “Restore curators” buttons should only be available to owners instead of managers.
As @JPOWERPUFFGIRLS suggested below, the list will only be visible to managers to avoid hurting Scratchers feelings.

Anyways, Support!

scratchykit5743 wrote:

however some people in more professional studios like TFH or the AAA (just an example) might not be happy with it.

JPOWERPUFFGIRLS wrote:

scratchykit5743 wrote:

however some people in more professional studios like TFH or the AAA (just an example) might not be happy with it.

how?

TapingAnimations wrote:

JPOWERPUFFGIRLS wrote:

scratchykit5743 wrote:

however some people in more professional studios like TFH or the AAA (just an example) might not be happy with it.

how?

Better question- what is TFH and AAA

scratchykit5743 wrote:

semi-support. people in the RPing community, like my buddy redwolfowo, might be happy to try and restore bios and RPers in her studios. however some people in more professional studios like TFH or the AAA (just an example) might not be happy with it.

JPOWERPUFFGIRLS wrote:

TapingAnimations wrote:

JPOWERPUFFGIRLS wrote:

scratchykit5743 wrote:

however some people in more professional studios like TFH or the AAA (just an example) might not be happy with it.

how?

Better question- what is TFH and AAA

AAA = Anti Advertising Association

and I guess TFH is The Forum Helpers

scratchykit5743 wrote:

however some people in more professional studios like TFH or the AAA (just an example) might not be happy with it.

Ihatr wrote:

Total support, and I'm surprised this hasn't been suggested before. I can't tell you how many times I've seen studios get raided, and over half the managers/curators get deleted before action is taken. This would be an incredible addition. If this doesn't get added, one thing I like to do is invite my alt to the studio, and if my main account gets deleted, I can still curate on the alt, because you can't delete studio invites. Anyway, back to the point. Yes, this would be awesome. Anyway, could you update OP to include a history menu, where you could add back people that were deleted at a certain time. You don't want to add the raider back

EZ-Games wrote:

scratchykit5743 wrote:

however some people in more professional studios like TFH or the AAA (just an example) might not be happy with it.

If you're mentioning The Forum Helpers, I'm one of them and I wouldn't mind this feature, I think it's fine. I'm not sure why we as a group would be opposed to the idea.

This reminds me of an incident that happened with a collaboration studio I knew about a while back when someone removed everyone and said that the collaboration was over. The owner(s) of the studio ended up making a completely new studio, which was frustrating for them. I can see how this feature would help out with incidents like these.