can't find it link it

ilovericebubbles wrote:

Sheep_maker wrote:

trieuminh wrote:

BlueWonderCam wrote:

Actually, there is already a website that converts scratch to JavaScript. It is here: https://forkphorus.github.io/

That doesn't really do that…

It does, but it doesn't show the converted code because it's not made for manual editing, unlike Leopard.

I've had a look at Leopard, I'm not sure if that is what this question was about because it imports a library and then is written like a text-based Scratch.
I think that if you are going to translate Scratch to JavaScript, you want it without any libraries or behind-the-scenes, or ‘vanilla’ if you will.
If you want it like Leopard does, you may as well just have a typed version of Scratch.

There is no way to convert scratch to JavaScript without the resulting JavaScript needing a library.

A-E- wrote:

ilovericebubbles wrote:

Sheep_maker wrote:

trieuminh wrote:

BlueWonderCam wrote:

Actually, there is already a website that converts scratch to JavaScript. It is here: https://forkphorus.github.io/

That doesn't really do that…

It does, but it doesn't show the converted code because it's not made for manual editing, unlike Leopard.

I've had a look at Leopard, I'm not sure if that is what this question was about because it imports a library and then is written like a text-based Scratch.
I think that if you are going to translate Scratch to JavaScript, you want it without any libraries or behind-the-scenes, or ‘vanilla’ if you will.
If you want it like Leopard does, you may as well just have a typed version of Scratch.

There is no way to convert scratch to JavaScript without the resulting JavaScript needing a library.

Not sure about that.
If the library is doing something, you can copy that JavaScript and use it instead of importing it. Therefore this is untrue.

ilovericebubbles wrote:

A-E- wrote:

ilovericebubbles wrote:

Sheep_maker wrote:

trieuminh wrote:

BlueWonderCam wrote:

Actually, there is already a website that converts scratch to JavaScript. It is here: https://forkphorus.github.io/

That doesn't really do that…

It does, but it doesn't show the converted code because it's not made for manual editing, unlike Leopard.

I've had a look at Leopard, I'm not sure if that is what this question was about because it imports a library and then is written like a text-based Scratch.
I think that if you are going to translate Scratch to JavaScript, you want it without any libraries or behind-the-scenes, or ‘vanilla’ if you will.
If you want it like Leopard does, you may as well just have a typed version of Scratch.

There is no way to convert scratch to JavaScript without the resulting JavaScript needing a library.

Not sure about that.
If the library is doing something, you can copy that JavaScript and use it instead of importing it. Therefore this is untrue.

You are then still using the library, just importing it by hand.

bump

bump

trieuminh wrote:

bump

A-E- wrote:

ilovericebubbles wrote:

A-E- wrote:

ilovericebubbles wrote:

Sheep_maker wrote:

trieuminh wrote:

BlueWonderCam wrote:

Actually, there is already a website that converts scratch to JavaScript. It is here: https://forkphorus.github.io/

That doesn't really do that…

It does, but it doesn't show the converted code because it's not made for manual editing, unlike Leopard.

I've had a look at Leopard, I'm not sure if that is what this question was about because it imports a library and then is written like a text-based Scratch.
I think that if you are going to translate Scratch to JavaScript, you want it without any libraries or behind-the-scenes, or ‘vanilla’ if you will.
If you want it like Leopard does, you may as well just have a typed version of Scratch.

There is no way to convert scratch to JavaScript without the resulting JavaScript needing a library.

Not sure about that.
If the library is doing something, you can copy that JavaScript and use it instead of importing it. Therefore this is untrue.

You are then still using the library, just importing it by hand.

Then how were such libraries created???

ilovericebubbles wrote:

A-E- wrote:

ilovericebubbles wrote:

A-E- wrote:

ilovericebubbles wrote:

Sheep_maker wrote:

trieuminh wrote:

BlueWonderCam wrote:

Actually, there is already a website that converts scratch to JavaScript. It is here: https://forkphorus.github.io/

That doesn't really do that…

It does, but it doesn't show the converted code because it's not made for manual editing, unlike Leopard.

I've had a look at Leopard, I'm not sure if that is what this question was about because it imports a library and then is written like a text-based Scratch.
I think that if you are going to translate Scratch to JavaScript, you want it without any libraries or behind-the-scenes, or ‘vanilla’ if you will.
If you want it like Leopard does, you may as well just have a typed version of Scratch.

There is no way to convert scratch to JavaScript without the resulting JavaScript needing a library.

Not sure about that.
If the library is doing something, you can copy that JavaScript and use it instead of importing it. Therefore this is untrue.

You are then still using the library, just importing it by hand.

Then how were such libraries created???

Are you asking why libraries were created?

trieuminh wrote:

ilovericebubbles wrote:

A-E- wrote:

ilovericebubbles wrote:

A-E- wrote:

ilovericebubbles wrote:

Sheep_maker wrote:

trieuminh wrote:

BlueWonderCam wrote:

Actually, there is already a website that converts scratch to JavaScript. It is here: https://forkphorus.github.io/

That doesn't really do that…

It does, but it doesn't show the converted code because it's not made for manual editing, unlike Leopard.

I've had a look at Leopard, I'm not sure if that is what this question was about because it imports a library and then is written like a text-based Scratch.
I think that if you are going to translate Scratch to JavaScript, you want it without any libraries or behind-the-scenes, or ‘vanilla’ if you will.
If you want it like Leopard does, you may as well just have a typed version of Scratch.

There is no way to convert scratch to JavaScript without the resulting JavaScript needing a library.

Not sure about that.
If the library is doing something, you can copy that JavaScript and use it instead of importing it. Therefore this is untrue.

You are then still using the library, just importing it by hand.

Then how were such libraries created???

Are you asking why libraries were created?

No, I am saying that you don't need a library to convert Scratch to JS because the libraries were written without needing a library.

ilovericebubbles wrote:

trieuminh wrote:

ilovericebubbles wrote:

A-E- wrote:

ilovericebubbles wrote:

A-E- wrote:

ilovericebubbles wrote:

Sheep_maker wrote:

trieuminh wrote:

BlueWonderCam wrote:

Actually, there is already a website that converts scratch to JavaScript. It is here: https://forkphorus.github.io/

That doesn't really do that…

It does, but it doesn't show the converted code because it's not made for manual editing, unlike Leopard.

I've had a look at Leopard, I'm not sure if that is what this question was about because it imports a library and then is written like a text-based Scratch.
I think that if you are going to translate Scratch to JavaScript, you want it without any libraries or behind-the-scenes, or ‘vanilla’ if you will.
If you want it like Leopard does, you may as well just have a typed version of Scratch.

There is no way to convert scratch to JavaScript without the resulting JavaScript needing a library.

Not sure about that.
If the library is doing something, you can copy that JavaScript and use it instead of importing it. Therefore this is untrue.

You are then still using the library, just importing it by hand.

Then how were such libraries created???

Are you asking why libraries were created?

No, I am saying that you don't need a library to convert Scratch to JS because the libraries were written without needing a library.

Yes.

If you look at forkphorus/phosphorus/github, they compile scratch projects to javascript to make them run faster. you could base a source code for this on that, but just make it show the lines of javascript instead of running them.

Could this be used as an embed?

liamboyhalo wrote:

Could this be used as an embed?

Please don't necropost.