LankyBox01 wrote:

It's for experimenting

…hacking the website?

Basic88 wrote:

LankyBox01 wrote:

It's for experimenting

…hacking the website?

No dude
Did you even read the OP?
There are limits
There are only the stuff that the world already knows of!

LankyBox01 wrote:

Basic88 wrote:

LankyBox01 wrote:

It's for experimenting

…hacking the website?

No dude
Did you even read the OP?
There are limits
There are only the stuff that the world already knows of!

Why train 8 year olds admin tools? The only use I see is for training admins. It could also be a distraction in a school Scratch Class.

Basic88 wrote:

LankyBox01 wrote:

Basic88 wrote:

LankyBox01 wrote:

It's for experimenting

…hacking the website?

No dude
Did you even read the OP?
There are limits
There are only the stuff that the world already knows of!

Why train 8 year olds admin tools? The only use I see is for training admins.

*Cough Cough* 12-year-olds *Cough Cough*

LankyBox01 wrote:

Basic88 wrote:

LankyBox01 wrote:

Basic88 wrote:

LankyBox01 wrote:

It's for experimenting

…hacking the website?

No dude
Did you even read the OP?
There are limits
There are only the stuff that the world already knows of!

Why train 8 year olds admin tools? The only use I see is for training admins.

*Cough Cough* 12-year-olds *Cough Cough*

I edited the post. Please read the rest.

Basic88 wrote:

LankyBox01 wrote:

Basic88 wrote:

LankyBox01 wrote:

Basic88 wrote:

LankyBox01 wrote:

It's for experimenting

…hacking the website?

No dude
Did you even read the OP?
There are limits
There are only the stuff that the world already knows of!

Why train 8 year olds admin tools? The only use I see is for training admins.

*Cough Cough* 12-year-olds *Cough Cough*

I edited the post. Please read the rest.

mhm

LankyBox01 wrote:

mhm

There are reasons where there are no “Area 51 sims” and things like that, it's classified .

Basic88 wrote:

LankyBox01 wrote:

mhm

There are reasons where there are no “Area 51 sims” and things like that, it's classified .

Area 51 is a place to test weapons and other military defense objects used in war

No support.

If a vulnerability was found in the simulator, it could also be applied to the real site, allowing people access to the real admin tools

support

thr565ono wrote:

No support.

If a vulnerability was found in the simulator, it could also be applied to the real site, allowing people access to the real admin tools

No it can't!
There's no way you can do that
Try it.

LankyBox01 wrote:

thr565ono wrote:

No support.

If a vulnerability was found in the simulator, it could also be applied to the real site, allowing people access to the real admin tools

No it can't!
There's no way you can do that
Try it.

No, a vulnerability in the admin tools, that could allow you to access the admin tools on the real site, as you can study the admin dashboards, and workout how to activate them using the JavaScript console

LankyBox01 wrote:

But they have like 100 developers

As far as I know there are only like 15 developers. And not all of them work on the website.

thr565ono wrote:

LankyBox01 wrote:

thr565ono wrote:

No support.

If a vulnerability was found in the simulator, it could also be applied to the real site, allowing people access to the real admin tools

No it can't!
There's no way you can do that
Try it.

No, a vulnerability in the admin tools, that could allow you to access the admin tools on the real site, as you can study the admin dashboards, and workout how to activate them using the JavaScript console

The easiest way to activate admin tools is to set the [removed by self - publicizing admin tools is actually kinda a security risk for the scratch team] with an extension

I support this! Besides, if you don't like a project, you can take your frustration out on the “dream island” version! (I like garnetluvcookie's analogy to the dream town/island feature in ACNL/ACNH)

EDIT: I no longer support this after reading the security argument against this suggestion.

It is a general policy among moderation teams that the “behind the scenes” stuff needs to stay private. For example, while I am able to let people know what features we have on the site, we aren't allowed to show the full details and the buttons that allow us to control them.

This can be for a variety of reasons, but a lot of it is to prevent any breaches in website integrity.

DownsGameClub wrote:

It is a general policy among moderation teams that the “behind the scenes” stuff needs to stay private. For example, while I am able to let people know what features we have on the site, we aren't allowed to show the full details and the buttons that allow us to control them.

This can be for a variety of reasons, but a lot of it is to prevent any breaches in website integrity.

I have only added the things that people know In Details
Many people know about the admin bar, clear cache button, links to search users and other stuff
But not the dustbin, we don't know what it looks like!
A (mock-up) forum reports queue, there are zap buttons that show the report has been reviewed, and other stuff!

whats the point of that lul

LankyBox01 wrote:

thr565ono wrote:

No support.

If a vulnerability was found in the simulator, it could also be applied to the real site, allowing people access to the real admin tools

No it can't!
There's no way you can do that
Try it.

bruh theres multiple ways it could be applied to the actual website, inspect element lol (soory to any coders if this is wrong I never can seem to open up the console on mac lol) and other things trust me if the bad word detector can be disabled (it can) then trust me there can be a way to add these to the persons console and possibly any expiernced programmars using it for badd.

no support

Support. This would be very fun, and it could be used as a simulator for ST applicants.