-The Truth on False/Mass Reporting-

Col_Cat228

Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:
███████╗ █████╗ ██╗ ██╗ ███████╗ ██████╗
██╔════╝ ██╔══██╗ ██║ ██╔╝ ██╔════╝ ╚════██╗
█████╗ ███████║ █████╔╝ █████╗ ▄███╔╝
██╔══╝ ██╔══██║ ██╔═██╗ ██╔══╝ ▀▀══╝
██║ ██║ ██║ ██║ ██╗ ███████╗ ██╗
╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚══════╝ ╚═╝

What in the world is this?

SmellyMonkey43

Col_Cat228 wrote:
Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:
███████╗ █████╗ ██╗ ██╗ ███████╗ ██████╗
██╔════╝ ██╔══██╗ ██║ ██╔╝ ██╔════╝ ╚════██╗
█████╗ ███████║ █████╔╝ █████╗ ▄███╔╝
██╔══╝ ██╔══██║ ██╔═██╗ ██╔══╝ ▀▀══╝
██║ ██║ ██║ ██║ ██╗ ███████╗ ██╗
╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚══════╝ ╚═╝
What in the world is this?

Some weird thing they think is cool
It's a cool title thingy!

Last edited by SmellyMonkey43 (June 26, 2020 18:30:55)

TheToothlessWolf

It says “fake”
Edit: does that count as a ninja? Hmm

Last edited by TheToothlessWolf (June 26, 2020 18:30:25)

Super_Scratch_Bros20

Col_Cat228 wrote:
Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:
███████╗ █████╗ ██╗ ██╗ ███████╗ ██████╗
██╔════╝ ██╔══██╗ ██║ ██╔╝ ██╔════╝ ╚════██╗
█████╗ ███████║ █████╔╝ █████╗ ▄███╔╝
██╔══╝ ██╔══██║ ██╔═██╗ ██╔══╝ ▀▀══╝
██║ ██║ ██║ ██║ ██╗ ███████╗ ██╗
╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚══════╝ ╚═╝
What in the world is this?

I kind of got inspired by large letters, so I'm using some as a bit of a test for something to come.

Basic88

KayChiWolf wrote:
OMG MY PEEPS LOOK AT THIS
-snip- OK -snip- SPELLD YOUR WRONG, THIS IS SUPPOSEDLY FROM THE SCRATCH TEAM BUT IT SAYS “ur” INSTEAD OF “your” :0
Edit: ok so I thought it said ur but instead it’s worse, ITS THE EXAMPLE U USED!

Please do not name and shame. Please edit out the scratchers username

Super_Scratch_Bros20

SmellyMonkey43 wrote:
Some weird thing they think is cool

….

It's a cool title thingy!

Thanks!

BlobbyBoy0

Can I simply state that I trust the image of the real report, but I doubt the rest of the stuff you did. I have a good amount of proof, not enough to say you're wrong, just enough to say you're wrong.

Last edited by Harakou (June 27, 2020 19:53:59)

PrincessFlowerTV

BlobbyBoy0 wrote:
-Quote snip-

Can I simply state that I trust the image of the real report, but I doubt the rest of the stuff you did. I have a good amount of proof, not enough to say you're wrong, just enough to say you're wrong.

Please do not quote the entire OP. It fills up the page, and is just plain unnecessary.

Super_Scratch_Bros20

BlobbyBoy0 wrote:
-snip-

Can I simply state that I trust the image of the real report, but I doubt the rest of the stuff you did. I have a good amount of proof, not enough to say you're wrong, just enough to say you're wrong.

Please don't quote the entire post. It is closely related to spam.

EDIT: Yikes! I got ninja'd!

Also, I'm just saying that the messages are automated, meaning that they will always be the same besides the moderators' notes. If they are not the same, then it was clearly edited.

Please read the other posts in this topic, as they can confirm that all of the information in my topic is true.

Last edited by Super_Scratch_Bros20 (June 27, 2020 16:45:10)

Basic88

BlobbyBoy0 wrote:
-quote snip-
Can I simply state that I trust the image of the real report, but I doubt the rest of the stuff you did. I have a good amount of proof, not enough to say you're wrong, just enough to say you're wrong.

The OP clearly gives links to the proof, they didn't lie. Please do not just post negative stuff just because you don't agree with something.

Last edited by Basic88 (June 27, 2020 16:47:27)

kitten769

Basic88 wrote:
BlobbyBoy0 wrote:
-quote snip-
Can I simply state that I trust the image of the real report, but I doubt the rest of the stuff you did. I have a good amount of proof, not enough to say you're wrong, just enough to say you're wrong.
The OP clearly gives links to the proof, they didn't lie. Please do not just post negative stuff just because you don't agree with something.

They were apparently going to report me for it for some reason (?)

Maximouse

I would like to see a Scratch Team member confirm this.

Super_Scratch_Bros20

Maximouse wrote:
I would like to see a Scratch Team member confirm this.

Done:

Harakou* wrote:
Please understand that when someone is reported, we can see everything they've said and shared on the website. It's silly to say that someone was banned because of a false report, because we can know for certain what they did. Users are banned for reasons we can verify, and only after receiving warnings. I know that you think highly of your favorite Scratchers, but some of them will do things against the community guidelines. Instead of blaming the person that reported them, blame the person who was banned, because it's their responsibility.

(Source)

kitten769

Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:
Maximouse wrote:
I would like to see a Scratch Team member confirm this.

Done:

Harakou* wrote:
Please understand that when someone is reported, we can see everything they've said and shared on the website. It's silly to say that someone was banned because of a false report, because we can know for certain what they did. Users are banned for reasons we can verify, and only after receiving warnings. I know that you think highly of your favorite Scratchers, but some of them will do things against the community guidelines. Instead of blaming the person that reported them, blame the person who was banned, because it's their responsibility.

(Source)

You should add that to the OP.

zedthehedgehog

kitten769 wrote:
Super_Scratch_Bros20 wrote:
Maximouse wrote:
I would like to see a Scratch Team member confirm this.

Done:

Harakou* wrote:
Please understand that when someone is reported, we can see everything they've said and shared on the website. It's silly to say that someone was banned because of a false report, because we can know for certain what they did. Users are banned for reasons we can verify, and only after receiving warnings. I know that you think highly of your favorite Scratchers, but some of them will do things against the community guidelines. Instead of blaming the person that reported them, blame the person who was banned, because it's their responsibility.

(Source)
You should add that to the OP.

He did

Super_Scratch_Bros20

kitten769 wrote:
You should add that to the OP.

I did when I made the topic.

EDIT: Ninja'd.

Last edited by Super_Scratch_Bros20 (June 27, 2020 18:18:51)

CuteSeal126

KayChiWolf wrote:
OMG MY PEEPS LOOK AT THIS
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/387111984/ OK GOLDEN EAGLE STUDIOS SPELLD YOUR WRONG, THIS IS SUPPOSEDLY FROM THE SCRATCH TEAM BUT IT SAYS “ur” INSTEAD OF “your” :0
Edit: ok so I thought it said ur but instead it’s worse, ITS THE EXAMPLE U USED!

Actually, I went into the code and removed the oc. It actually says None Your account will be automatically unblocked on April 19, 2020, 10:41 p.m.

kitten769

CuteSeal126 wrote:
KayChiWolf wrote:
OMG MY PEEPS LOOK AT THIS
https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/387111984/ OK GOLDEN EAGLE STUDIOS SPELLD YOUR WRONG, THIS IS SUPPOSEDLY FROM THE SCRATCH TEAM BUT IT SAYS “ur” INSTEAD OF “your” :0
Edit: ok so I thought it said ur but instead it’s worse, ITS THE EXAMPLE U USED!
Actually, I went into the code and removed the oc. It actually says None Your account will be automatically unblocked on April 19, 2020, 10:41 p.m.

You can't deny that it was a clever fake. Using your OC to block the mistakes means people have to pay attention to notice the fakery.

coder2045

Wow. I'm gonna start having to wonder about mass report protesters.
At least if I get famous, I won't be banned 160 hours a week by trolls.

Super_Scratch_Bros20

Made some edits to clarify the OP.

Discuss Scratch