Discuss Scratch
![[RSS Feed]](http://cdn.scratch.mit.edu/scratchr2/static/__5b3e40ec58a840b41702360e9891321b__//djangobb_forum/img/feed-icon-small.png "[RSS Feed]"){kind=icon}
- Failord
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Some suggestions:
Yeah. I never use broadcasts anymore. I prefer to have one extremely long script over a bunch of small scripts. Using this workaround, it helps make a bunch of scripts into one.
Broadcasts can be helpful when making a title sequence for a project. Use Green Flag to start the sequence, and when it's done, broadcast to start everything else up. But notice this doesn't need a new boolean, nor variables.
- dusty22
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Some suggestions:
I want me that single-stepping back. It'd probably work pretty well in flash too. I remember in the 1.4 player it wasn't helpful because everything would freeze up because my scripts were so huge.
- OrcaCat
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Some suggestions:
I want me that single-stepping back. It'd probably work pretty well in flash too. I remember in the 1.4 player it wasn't helpful because everything would freeze up because my scripts were so huge.+9001
- SuperJedi224
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Some suggestions:
I want me that single-stepping back. It'd probably work pretty well in flash too. I remember in the 1.4 player it wasn't helpful because everything would freeze up because my scripts were so huge.Already on the list.
- dusty22
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Some suggestions:
(Oops)
EDIT: Sorry, redundant post.
EDIT: Sorry, redundant post.
Last edited by dusty22 (June 12, 2013 13:30:31)
- 7734f
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Some suggestions:
I want me that single-stepping back. It'd probably work pretty well in flash too. I remember in the 1.4 player it wasn't helpful because everything would freeze up because my scripts were so huge.+9001
I second that
(Pssst, it's over nine-thousand!)
- 7734f
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Some suggestions:
14. **Images from http://internetometer.com/ should be allowed. Myself and, most likely, the other scratchers with internetometers, would like to be able to use them properly.**YUSYUSYUSYUSYUSYUS! +10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
- OrcaCat
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Some suggestions:
That was intentionalI want me that single-stepping back. It'd probably work pretty well in flash too. I remember in the 1.4 player it wasn't helpful because everything would freeze up because my scripts were so huge.+9001
I second that
(Pssst, it's over nine-thousand!)
- 7734f
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Some suggestions:
That was intentionalI want me that single-stepping back. It'd probably work pretty well in flash too. I remember in the 1.4 player it wasn't helpful because everything would freeze up because my scripts were so huge.+9001
I second that
(Pssst, it's over nine-thousand!)
I know.
Last edited by 7734f (June 1, 2013 01:01:15)
- Scratch12300
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Some suggestions:
POST DELETED
Last edited by Scratch12300 (June 2, 2013 02:20:59)
- Scratch12300
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Some suggestions:
20. Say [] until <> block.You can use this:
say [string]
wait until <true>
say []
- SuperJedi224
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Some suggestions:
Would you rather use one block or three? And it doesn't work with custom blocks because of the way they handle booleans.20. Say [] until <> block.You can use this:say [string]
wait until <true>
say []
- dusty22
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Some suggestions:
That was intentionalI want me that single-stepping back. It'd probably work pretty well in flash too. I remember in the 1.4 player it wasn't helpful because everything would freeze up because my scripts were so huge.+9001
I second that
(Pssst, it's over nine-thousand!)
Why was removing single-stepping intentional?!
- ImagineIt
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Some suggestions:
They mean the 9001 was intentional.That was intentionalI want me that single-stepping back. It'd probably work pretty well in flash too. I remember in the 1.4 player it wasn't helpful because everything would freeze up because my scripts were so huge.+9001
I second that
(Pssst, it's over nine-thousand!)
Why was removing single-stepping intentional?!
- Scratch12300
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
Some suggestions:
No, for the custom block it would look like this:Would you rather use one block or three? And it doesn't work with custom blocks because of the way they handle booleans.20. Say [] until <> block.You can use this:say [string]
wait until <true>
say []
define {say (string1) until <boolean1>}
say (string1)
wait until <boolean1>
say []- 247flashgames
-
Scratcher
6 posts
Some suggestions:
I like two, five, seven, eight, nine, ten, twelve, sixteen, seventeen, nineteen, and twenty!
- SuperJedi224
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Some suggestions:
Doesn't work. You know why? In Scratch 2.0, boolean inputs for custom blocks are preevaluated.No, for the custom block it would look like this:Would you rather use one block or three? And it doesn't work with custom blocks because of the way they handle booleans.20. Say [] until <> block.You can use this:say [string]
wait until <true>
say []define {say (string1) until <boolean1>}
say (string1)
wait until <boolean1>
say []