EIephant_Lover wrote:

It is workaroundable, but your first thing didn't make sense, not to be rude XD What that would do is multiply 1514 by three, and since it only rounds to the ones place, it would just divide it by three and you'd get 1514.

StrangeMagic32 wrote:

No support

all in all I would be very confused.

This makes more sense to me

((round ((1514) * (3))) / (3))

Not 100% sure if that is proper rounding, but I'd rather deal with that than

([round v] to the (1000) place (1514) :: operators

Also as far as I know this is easily work-aroundable
with

((round (() / ())) * ())
((round (() * ())) / ())

([round v] to the (10) place (100) :: operators

coder2045 wrote:

P.S.

([round v] to the (10) place (100) :: operators

sounds like you are rounding 10 to the 100th place.

([round v] () to [0.1] ▲▼ place :: operators)

EIephant_Lover wrote:

-snip-

coder2045 wrote:

P.S.

([round v] to the (10) place (100) :: operators

sounds like you are rounding 10 to the 100th place.

Are you talking to me, or them? What I suggested most recently was this, remember?

([round v] () to [0.1] ▲▼ place :: operators)

(round (123) to the (10th v) place::operators)

LuckyLucky8 wrote:

Support because this would be useful, but the block should be more like this:

(round (123) to the (10th v) place::operators)

coder2045 wrote:

EIephant_Lover wrote:

-snip-

coder2045 wrote:

P.S.

([round v] to the (10) place (100) :: operators

sounds like you are rounding 10 to the 100th place.

Are you talking to me, or them? What I suggested most recently was this, remember?

([round v] () to [0.1] ▲▼ place :: operators)

I was not talking to you. I can remember things, okay?

EIephant_Lover wrote:

LuckyLucky8 wrote:

Support because this would be useful, but the block should be more like this:

(round (123) to the (10th v) place::operators)

I've noted why it can't be a dropdown in the OP.

(round to the (8) place (100)::operators)