WindOctahedron wrote:

mica43683 wrote:

WindOctahedron wrote:

-snip-

Wouldn't

<(variable) > [7]>

also be greater than 5?

Oh, yes. I meant

set [variable v] to (pick random (1) to (8))
if <(variable) < [5]> then  // prob. 1/2
...
else
if <(variable) < [7]> then // prob. 1/4
...
else

if <(variable) = [7]> then // both prob. 1/8
...
 
else // prob. 1/8
...
end
end
end

Thanks for pointing that out.

< 5 would also be < 7
scratchblocks]

set [variable v] to (pick random (1) to (8))
if <(variable) < [5]> then // 1/2. Being < 5 would mean it would be 1,2,3 or 4. If it wasn't one of those, it must be higher.
...
else
if <<(variable) > [4]> and <(variable) < [7]>> then // 1/4. This would make it either 5 or 6. In your script, it was made in a way that 5 could
... // never be chosen, because it would always be either > 5 or < 5, but never = 5.
else
if <(variable) = [7]> then // both 1/8
...
else
...
end
end
end

No Support. You can use the list for a random reaction.

when green flag clicked
add [Hehe!] to [list v]
add [That tickles!] to [list v]
add [I feel so happy!] to [list v]

when green flag clicked
forever
if <touching [mouse pointer v] ?> then
say (item (pick random (1) to (3)) of [list v] :: list) for (2) secs
wait until <not <touching [mouse pointer v] ?>>
end
end

Troyer_Kem wrote:

No Support. You can use the list for a random reaction.

when green flag clicked
add [Hehe!] to [list v]
add [That tickles!] to [list v]
add [I feel so happy!] to [list v]

when green flag clicked
forever
if <touching [mouse pointer v] ?> then
say (item (pick random (1) to (3)) of [list v] :: list) for (2) secs
wait until <not <touching [mouse pointer v] ?>>
end
end

This would only choose different things to say, not different outcomes.

Semi-Support. The workaround is pretty easy, but this might benefit people with less knowledge of coding.

mica43683 wrote:

Troyer_Kem wrote:

No Support. You can use the list for a random reaction.

when green flag clicked
add [Hehe!] to [list v]
add [That tickles!] to [list v]
add [I feel so happy!] to [list v]

when green flag clicked
forever
if <touching [mouse pointer v] ?> then
say (item (pick random (1) to (3)) of [list v] :: list) for (2) secs
wait until <not <touching [mouse pointer v] ?>>
end
end

This would only choose different things to say, not different outcomes.

Oh okay then.

Bump

Bump

Bump

Bump

Bump

mica43683 wrote:

Bump

mica43683 wrote:

Bump

mica43683 wrote:

Bump

mica43683 wrote:

Bump

mica43683 wrote:

Bump

404 error?

Truck11111 wrote:

mica43683 wrote:

Bump

mica43683 wrote:

Bump

mica43683 wrote:

Bump

mica43683 wrote:

Bump

mica43683 wrote:

Bump

404 error?

Yup. I tried to post it only once or twice yesterday, but it posted a million times.

mica43683 wrote:

WindOctahedron wrote:

-snip-

< 5 would also be < 7

Yes, it would, but the “if x, then y, else z” is equivalent to "if x, then y; if not x, then z". Here, z = if a, then b. So it checks if a number is less than 5, and if not, checks if it is at least less than 7.

You mean a new logic gate? Um, sure. I'm gonna support.

Dilek10 wrote:

You mean a new logic gate? Um, sure. I'm gonna support.

No, it's not a logic gate. It's a block that allows random outcomes.

Hi

Zelmore wrote:

Hi

Hi! Welcome to Scratch, as well as the Scratch Forums! You just posted “Hi”, which isn't exactly a good thing, because it's quite irrelevant to this thread, but if you like the word hi, you can say that in the “New Scratchers” forum here! People are very nice there and will reply with more “hi”s than you can ever think of!

Semi support: I really have no opinion on this, but I do think this is a good block for less experienced people, and for people who just want to make things simpler, but the workaround is just fine for me.

Tiger_Person wrote:

Semi support: I really have no opinion on this, but I do think this is a good block for less experienced people, and for people who just want to make things simpler, but the workaround is just fine for me.

I don't think we should have many blocks just to “make things simpler”. They're going to need to learn the workarounds eventually, so we might as well teach it early on.

It has a es workaround but I support as it is a cool block I like it