hellounicorns2 wrote:

As far as laws go, Lola won the election fair and properly. I understand how annoying it is to lose by one vote, but keep in mind all SPA elections so far have either been a tie or by one vote (first election was by one and second was a tie). If we do a re-vote, it should be done in 2 weeks time and called by Lola. I mean, technically we should only be able to re-vote after a month according to the laws however we can disregard that if enough people’s opinion is that we should have a re-vote soon, so it’s up to Lola. I will just remind everyone that this election was run perfectly normally despite the confusion, so Lola has no reason to hold a re-vote if they don’t want to. Also, in the case of a re-vote additional candidates may join in.

Also, thank for creating the voting thing smiley! I really appreciate it.

TL;DR The future is completely up to Lola since they fairly won the election.


Edit: also I will be getting page 150 no edit mark my words

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

Hmmmmmm. Count the shops.

hellounicorns2 wrote:

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

Hmmmmmm. Count the shops.

I feel really bad saying this but uh…

You actually lost by 2 votes since FrenchBread49 who voted for you closed their old shop and left the SPA a couple weeks ago.

(I just checked the shops)

title wrote:

ᔕᕼOᑭ ᑭᗩᖇTᑎEᖇᔕᕼIᑭ ᗩᔕᔕOᑕIᗩTIOᑎ

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

It's 11:29 PM here.
It's not equal. It's not up to Lola. It's up to all of us. Don't. or war

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

Partnership? More like advertising.

hellounicorns2 wrote:

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

Partnership? More like advertising.

We can fix that, all you need to do is communicate to the president about what you think needs changing and knowing Lola I almost guarantee that they will listen.

LotusLavender wrote:

hellounicorns2 wrote:

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

Partnership? More like advertising.

We can fix that, all you need to do is communicate to the president about what you think needs changing and knowing Lola I almost guarantee that they will listen.

I will listen although I feel that that was said to insult the organisation not as constructive criticism. Do you have any ideas.
I would not like to re-vote as I feel that we are very busy and re-voting without a reason would delay us in doing things that need doing to get SPA back to its brilliant self. Afternetwork, 3 months shouldnt be too long to wait.

MClovers wrote:

LotusLavender wrote:

hellounicorns2 wrote:

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

Partnership? More like advertising.

We can fix that, all you need to do is communicate to the president about what you think needs changing and knowing Lola I almost guarantee that they will listen.

I will listen although I feel that that was said to insult the organisation not as constructive criticism. Do you have any ideas.
I would not like to re-vote as I feel that we are very busy and re-voting without a reason would delay us in doing things that need doing to get SPA back to its brilliant self. Afternetwork, 3 months shouldnt be too long to wait.

I agree. AfterNetwork, please just let it rest.
Even if I think we need a re-vote, you don't have to insult the SPA.

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

Here's a speech.

MY SECOND SPEECH AS NOT PRESIDENT
Look, I said peace. but it caused a fight. A fight just because someone was left out. Someone didn't have rights, it was like segregation (meaning: the action or state of setting someone or something apart from other people or things or being set apart.) in the laws. He was being set apart just by law. So let's make this happen because no one needs to be left out! Let's do a tie election. Whoever wins that one wins. It's mean to me and him, it's empathy. But empathy may be hard for me (no reason why), I understand. You are all having a chance to find that feeling in your hearts. So, let's vote to have a tie election! All of the public may join, disregarding that “law.” It brings harsh to the community, it separates the only ONE person that has not voted. It also may separate a lot of other people, but that's the way it is. Why? Because it's serious, not fun. So let's vote for a tie election before more people are left out in the next election. No one ever knows, but it's sad. It's empathy. So let's vote for that tiebreaker! -AFNNetworkK12

hellounicorns2 wrote:

As far as laws go, Lola won the election fair and properly. I understand how annoying it is to lose by one vote, but keep in mind all SPA elections so far have either been a tie or by one vote (first election was by one and second was a tie). If we do a re-vote, it should be done in 2 weeks time and called by Lola. I mean, technically we should only be able to re-vote after a month according to the laws however we can disregard that if enough people’s opinion is that we should have a re-vote soon, so it’s up to Lola. I will just remind everyone that this election was run perfectly normally despite the confusion, so Lola has no reason to hold a re-vote if they don’t want to. Also, in the case of a re-vote additional candidates may join in.

Also, thank for creating the voting thing smiley! I really appreciate it.

TL;DR The future is completely up to Lola since they fairly won the election.


Edit: also I will be getting page 150 no edit mark my words

smileycreations15 wrote:

i will get page 150

MClovers wrote:

You guys better appreciate the sunshine and rainbows whilst after is away, he'll try to convince you guys. Trust me.

hellounicorns2 wrote:

MClovers wrote:

You guys better appreciate the sunshine and rainbows whilst after is away, he'll try to convince you guys. Trust me.

I don’t think he’s a bad person, I just think that the loss hurt him and if we’re being honest losing hurts… no matter who you are. I hope that we can work together and after can help as an advisor of sorts to Lola as he is a really smart guy who could really help the SPA in the future. I feel like being negative will only make him more angry - if we are all positive and optimistic then we will help lighten the mood and cease the tension.

hellounicorns2 wrote:

MClovers wrote:

You guys better appreciate the sunshine and rainbows whilst after is away, he'll try to convince you guys. Trust me.

I don’t think he’s a bad person, I just think that the loss hurt him and if we’re being honest losing hurts… no matter who you are. I hope that we can work together and after can help as an advisor of sorts to Lola as he is a really smart guy who could really help the SPA in the future. I feel like being negative will only make him more angry - if we are all positive and optimistic then we will help lighten the mood and cease the tension.

MClovers wrote:

He's not a bad person, but he is quite persuasive. Seriously, trust me.

smileycreations15 wrote:

I am the advisor . He can be vice-advisor.