OwenRich wrote:

DefeattheHuns wrote:

OwenRich wrote:

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

Kek = Kayack
lol

it doesn't

maybe it can

Kek is an online term with similar meanings to LOL or haha, used especially by gamers. Since the 2016 US presidential election, the Egyptian god Kek, portrayed as Pepe the Frog, has become a symbol of the so-called “alt-right.”

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

OwenRich wrote:

DefeattheHuns wrote:

OwenRich wrote:

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

Kek = Kayack
lol

it doesn't

maybe it can

Kek is an online term with similar meanings to LOL or haha, used especially by gamers. Since the 2016 US presidential election, the Egyptian god Kek, portrayed as Pepe the Frog, has become a symbol of the so-called “alt-right.”

i just made that as a joke

ARTICLE 13 HAS BEEN PASSED FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION

DefeattheHuns wrote:

ATTENTION:

ARTICLE 13 HAS BEEN PASSED FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION

DefeattheHuns wrote:

ATTENTION:

ARTICLE 13 HAS BEEN PASSED FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

DefeattheHuns wrote:

ATTENTION:

ARTICLE 13 HAS BEEN PASSED FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION

#NoMoreMemesForEurope

DefeattheHuns wrote:

BUUMP!!!

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

Kek = Kayack
lol

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

DefeattheHuns wrote:

ATTENTION:

ARTICLE 13 HAS BEEN PASSED FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION

#NoMoreMemesForEurope

acooperw2018 wrote:

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

DefeattheHuns wrote:

ATTENTION:

ARTICLE 13 HAS BEEN PASSED FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION

#NoMoreMemesForEurope

We're too late. Article 13 got all of the infinity votes and wiped out all the memes for Europe. There's nothing we could do to stop it.

Wikipedia wrote:

Article 13 replaces the “mere conduit” exemption from copyright infringement from for-profit “online content sharing service providers” with a new, conditional exemption to liability. These conditions are a claimed implementation of “effective and proportionate measures” to "prevent the availability of specific works identified by rightsholders“, acting ”expeditiously“ to remove them, and demonstrating that ”best efforts“ have been made to prevent their future availability. The article also extends any licenses granted to content hosts to their users, as long as those users are not acting ”on a commercial basis“.

The article directs member states to consider the size of the provider, the amount of content uploaded, and the effectiveness of the measures imposed ”in light of technological developments“. It also mandates an appeals process, and requires content hosts to share ”information on the use of content“ with the content's owner, the lack of which has been a point of contention in the past.

Article 13's provisions target commercial web hosts which ”store and give the public access to a large amount of works or other subject-matter uploaded by its users which organise and promote for profit-making purposes“. The proposal makes explicit that this does not include private cloud storage services, non-profit encyclopedias (such as Wikipedia), nor non-profit educational or scientific repositories.

Article 13b requires websites which ”automatically reproduce or refer to significant amounts of copyright-protected visual works“ to ”conclude fair and balanced licensing agreements with any requesting rightholders".

Article 13 was renamed to Article 17 in the final trilogue draft issued in February 2019 and put to vote by the European Parliament.

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

acooperw2018 wrote:

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

DefeattheHuns wrote:

ATTENTION:

ARTICLE 13 HAS BEEN PASSED FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION

#NoMoreMemesForEurope

We're too late. Article 13 got all of the infinity votes and wiped out all the memes for Europe. There's nothing we could do to stop it.

NOW PEOPLE ARE DOING STRIKES IN EUROPE BECAUSE OF ARTICLE 13. ARTICLE 13 IS A COPYRIGHT LAW

Wikipedia wrote:

Article 13 replaces the “mere conduit” exemption from copyright infringement from for-profit “online content sharing service providers” with a new, conditional exemption to liability. These conditions are a claimed implementation of “effective and proportionate measures” to "prevent the availability of specific works identified by rightsholders“, acting ”expeditiously“ to remove them, and demonstrating that ”best efforts“ have been made to prevent their future availability. The article also extends any licenses granted to content hosts to their users, as long as those users are not acting ”on a commercial basis“.

The article directs member states to consider the size of the provider, the amount of content uploaded, and the effectiveness of the measures imposed ”in light of technological developments“. It also mandates an appeals process, and requires content hosts to share ”information on the use of content“ with the content's owner, the lack of which has been a point of contention in the past.

Article 13's provisions target commercial web hosts which ”store and give the public access to a large amount of works or other subject-matter uploaded by its users which organise and promote for profit-making purposes“. The proposal makes explicit that this does not include private cloud storage services, non-profit encyclopedias (such as Wikipedia), nor non-profit educational or scientific repositories.

Article 13b requires websites which ”automatically reproduce or refer to significant amounts of copyright-protected visual works“ to ”conclude fair and balanced licensing agreements with any requesting rightholders".

Article 13 was renamed to Article 17 in the final trilogue draft issued in February 2019 and put to vote by the European Parliament.

WHY WIKIPEDIA!!!

openPoll wrote:

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

Kek = Kayack
lol

Censored = Signature
i couldent wait

DefeattheHuns wrote:

openPoll wrote:

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

Kek = Kayack
lol

Censored = Signature
i couldent wait

That's considered inappropriate for scratch, I will have to ask you to take it down. Our rules do say that things like that posted here may result in a strike or two.

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

FYI: Article 13 was renamed Article 17.

DefeattheHuns wrote:

openPoll wrote:

AFNNetworkK12 wrote:

Kek = Kayack
lol

Censored = Signature
i couldent wait

That's considered inappropriate for scratch, I will have to ask you to take it down. Our rules do say that things like that posted here may result in a strike or two.