Discuss Scratch

TheAdriCoolManDude
Scratcher
1000+ posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

Williamja wrote:

Please make it 50 or 25 I need the limit higher to make my game “Rainy Day” multiplayer!
It is 128 as of now.
Botcho_Otkho
Scratcher
1000+ posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

Williamja wrote:

Please make it 50 or 25 I need the limit higher to make my game “Rainy Day” multiplayer!
It is 128 as of now.
They refer to the “cloud variables limit”, not “ cloud variables characters limit”.
TheAdriCoolManDude
Scratcher
1000+ posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

Botcho_Otkho wrote:

TheAdriCoolManDude wrote:

Williamja wrote:

Please make it 50 or 25 I need the limit higher to make my game “Rainy Day” multiplayer!
It is 128 as of now.
They refer to the “cloud variables limit”, not “ cloud variables characters limit”.
Oh.
lavandris
Scratcher
6 posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

superben100
Scratcher
1000+ posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

lavandris wrote:

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/236558601/#editor
Interesting… Why is it unshared?
Tommy0924
Scratcher
100+ posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

I've kind of changed my answer to mostly no. But other backup variables may need to be created, and if 100000 people use a project then more backup vars will need to be created. And let's say they used 4 in their project. Then the more that view the project and use it, the more backup vars will be created. Let's say a year after the project was posted 286542 (random number) people used it. Let's say 250 tried to use it but were new scratchers. Then 286292 people actually used it. Now the data saves. 4 for other things not mentioned in this list, 6 for save vars. Then 1 year later 46578 (another random number) viewed the project after 2 years of being posted. 549 (one more random number) were new scratchers. Then 46029 people used it that were scratchers. More backup save vars. So yeah.

Nope.
PrincessFlowerTV
Scratcher
1000+ posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

Wow, this is out-dated. Should this get closed?
Botcho_Otkho
Scratcher
1000+ posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

PrincessFlowerTV wrote:

Wow, this is out-dated. Should this get closed?
I think yes. I don't know why people keep posting here when it's not possible to change it (the ST can't afford it).
{offtopic}hoi 60 secs rule{/offtopic}
jacksepticeye116
Scratcher
2 posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

i know way to store cloud data with >10 cloud variables

input these variables for replacements
(@(name of your save variable))
PrincessFlowerTV
Scratcher
1000+ posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

Reporting to be closed, because this is out-dated and will not be added.
lawrence_wei
Scratcher
29 posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

I have also run into this problem.
NDSDNS
Scratcher
1000+ posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

lawrence_wei wrote:

I have also run into this problem.
please don't necropost on old threads. this thread should be closed and it's not going to get added.
gamebeater187
Scratcher
1000+ posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

theonlygusti wrote:

No support.

You can use 1 cloud variable to do the job of 1 million.
No you can't.
This is because the cloud variable has a limit.
The limit sucks if you assume you have a huge audience with lots of followers. and you need to save their data.
Therefore, support
YubNubEwok
Scratcher
1000+ posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

NDSDNS wrote:

lawrence_wei wrote:

I have also run into this problem.
please don't necropost on old threads. this thread should be closed and it's not going to get added.
Technically, there is no such thing as a necropost in the Suggestions forum unless the suggestion has been accepted or rejected.
PrincessFlowerTV
Scratcher
1000+ posts

MAKE THE CLOUD VARIABLE LIMIT HIGHER!!!

PrincessFlowerTV wrote:

Reporting to be closed, because this is out-dated and will not be added.
Trying again. Hopfully this time, an ST member can either close this thread or give their view on the suggestion.

Powered by DjangoBB