LuckyLucky7 wrote:

list = ["ScratchCat"]
alert("Scratch Cat was here")
pop.list("ScratchCat")

I learned JavaScript before but I kind of don't remember everything about it.

ACE009 wrote:

LuckyLucky7 wrote:

list = ["ScratchCat"]
alert("Scratch Cat was here")
pop.list("ScratchCat")

I learned JavaScript before but I kind of don't remember everything about it.

Uh, you got pop and list backwards in the third line, it's list.pop() (since pop is a method of list, not list is a method of pop).

ACE009 wrote:

LuckyLucky7 wrote:

list = ["ScratchCat"]
alert("Scratch Cat was here")
pop.list("ScratchCat")

I learned JavaScript before but I kind of don't remember everything about it.

Uh, you got pop and list backwards in the third line, it's list.pop() (since pop is a method of list, not list is a method of pop).

(function() {
  window.pop = window;
  let _list = [];
  Object.defineProperty(pop, 'list', {
    get: () => {
      return item => {
        let index = _list.indexOf(item);
        if(index > -1) {
          _list.splice(index, 1);
          return item;
        } else {
          throw new ReferenceError(`"${item}" is not in pop.list`);
        }
      }
    },
    set: newList => {
      if(Array.isArray(newList)) {
        _list = newList;
      } else {
        _list.push(newList);
      }
    }
  });
})();

NickyNouse wrote:

ACE009 wrote:

LuckyLucky7 wrote:

list = ["ScratchCat"]
alert("Scratch Cat was here")
pop.list("ScratchCat")

I learned JavaScript before but I kind of don't remember everything about it.

Uh, you got pop and list backwards in the third line, it's list.pop() (since pop is a method of list, not list is a method of pop).

This code should make the above code work correctly:

(function() {
  window.pop = window;
  let _list = [];
  Object.defineProperty(pop, 'list', {
    get: () => {
      return item => {
        let index = _list.indexOf(item);
        if(index > -1) {
          _list.splice(index, 1);
          return item;
        } else {
          throw new ReferenceError(`"${item}" is not in pop.list`);
        }
      }
    },
    set: newList => {
      if(Array.isArray(newList)) {
        _list = newList;
      } else {
        _list.push(newList);
      }
    }
  });
})();

When Scratch is var
(function(2.000.000)
move 75 steps
if <Scratch> else <Scratch*>
6n´´``
pi 

ScratchDiogoh wrote:

Let's continue!

When Scratch is var
(function(2.000.000)
move 75 steps
if <Scratch> else <Scratch*>
6n´´``
pi 

NickyNouse wrote:

ScratchDiogoh wrote:

Let's continue!

When Scratch is var
(function(2.000.000)
move 75 steps
if <Scratch> else <Scratch*>
6n´´``
pi 

I… don't think anything I do will make that not be a syntax error

ScratchDiogoh wrote:

NickyNouse wrote:

ScratchDiogoh wrote:

Let's continue!

When Scratch is var
(function(2.000.000)
move 75 steps
if <Scratch> else <Scratch*>
6n´´``
pi 

I… don't think anything I do will make that not be a syntax error

Errors of synthesis are for example: ´´, /…

TheApiringHacker wrote:

var pooh ===== tigger;
oof(oww; my) {
    bones;; xdd
}
std::System.out.console.cout << "Bone hurting juice" <<<<< std::flush;
(putStrLn "Ouchie") >> (putStrLn $ show pooh)

Like my JS? :^)
/sarcasm

ScratchDiogoh wrote:

You did not put JS! Was it to fool us?

dude341 wrote:

ScratchDiogoh wrote:

You did not put JS! Was it to fool us?

Yes, this is why they said “sarcasm”

ScratchDiogoh wrote:

dude341 wrote:

ScratchDiogoh wrote:

You did not put JS! Was it to fool us?

Yes, this is why they said “sarcasm”

What's?

dude341 wrote:

ScratchDiogoh wrote:

dude341 wrote:

ScratchDiogoh wrote:

You did not put JS! Was it to fool us?

Yes, this is why they said “sarcasm”

What's?

Sarcasm basically means a joke.

dude341 wrote:

ScratchDiogoh wrote:

You did not put JS! Was it to fool us?

Yes, this is why they said “sarcasm”

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

JS tends to be weird

0 <= null
true
0 >= null
true
0 == null
false
0 === null
false

I prefer racket

(<= 0 '())
; <=: contract violation
;   expected: real?
;   given: '()
;   argument position: 2nd

Prelude> 0 <= ()

<interactive>:1:1: error:
    • No instance for (Num ()) arising from the literal ‘0’
    • In the first argument of ‘(<=)’, namely ‘0’
      In the expression: 0 <= ()
      In an equation for ‘it’: it = 0 <= ()

TheAspiringHacker wrote:

The check happens at compile-time! Therefore, y++ haskal > Racket!

TheAspiringHacker wrote:

Also, I see that you are using '() as an equivalent of null! y++ haskal has (), Nothing, and [] for you to choose from based on the meaning!

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

TheAspiringHacker wrote:

The check happens at compile-time! Therefore, y++ haskal > Racket!

non_sequitur.png

TheAspiringHacker wrote:

Also, I see that you are using '() as an equivalent of null! y++ haskal has (), Nothing, and [] for you to choose from based on the meaning!

And this is supposed to be a good thing? It's like JS undefined vs null vs empty array vs etc etc. Just confusing, and serves no useful purpose.

• () is the inhabitant of the unit type. The unit type corresponds with the True proposition in the Curry-Howard Isomorphism. However, because Haskell features nontermination, all types are also inhabited by _|_. (This flaw also applies to Racket, FYI.)
  
• Nothing is a constructor of Maybe, the option type. Instead of using null to represent absence of a value like in JS, you need to use Maybe, and thus must do case dianalysis/pattern matching, preventing null errors!
  
• [] is the constructor of the empty linked list. You, as a Racketeer, should already be familiar with the definition of the linked list.