wWSunPandaWw wrote:

run_script wrote:

wWSunPandaWw wrote:

This is an excellent solution to the problem and would definitely allow us to make our projects more unique.

But when one looks inside of the project of a different user, would the blocks be the size and color that the creator prefers or that size and color that you prefer?

I think changing the colour of the blocks is not really necessary, because that really is something that you can get used to. And with the size of the blocks – my suggestions would be to only have two options here (Like in 2.0 and like how 3.0 is now), in which case it would not really matter if it was what I preferred or what the creator preferred because I could always change it with just one click of the button!

Therefore I don't think that this point would be an issue

I still don't think I found an answer through your post or I misunderstood it. I'm asking if I looked inside of a project of a different user, would I see the blocks that I prefer them or that the creator prefers them, or something else?

Honeybee_ wrote:

wWSunPandaWw wrote:

The bigger blocks are not for Scratch 3.0 to be aimed at younger children, they're bigger so they'll be more accessible to mobile users, since coding on Mobile devices will be possible in 3.0.

Yes, but ask yourself:
Who uses tablets/iPads? Young kids
Who doesn't use them? Older kids — we in general have our own computers.

stickfiregames wrote:

-snip-
It would have whatever style you use. It's an account setting, not a project setting.

wWSunPandaWw wrote:

Honeybee_ wrote:

wWSunPandaWw wrote:

The bigger blocks are not for Scratch 3.0 to be aimed at younger children, they're bigger so they'll be more accessible to mobile users, since coding on Mobile devices will be possible in 3.0.

Yes, but ask yourself:
Who uses tablets/iPads? Young kids
Who doesn't use them? Older kids — we in general have our own computers.

But what about things like Phones and iPods? Older kids use those. They're smaller than tablets and iPads, so therefore, wouldn't dragging around the blocks be harder?

PrincessFlowerTV wrote:

-ShadowOfTheFuture- wrote:

I'd personally like to see something like a mode for mobile users and a mode for computer users, and the ability to toggle them.

^^^
Support for toggling them.

wWSunPandaWw wrote:

Honeybee_ wrote:

wWSunPandaWw wrote:

The bigger blocks are not for Scratch 3.0 to be aimed at younger children, they're bigger so they'll be more accessible to mobile users, since coding on Mobile devices will be possible in 3.0.

Yes, but ask yourself:
Who uses tablets/iPads? Young kids
Who doesn't use them? Older kids — we in general have our own computers.

But what about things like Phones and iPods? Older kids use those. They're smaller than tablets and iPads, so therefore, wouldn't dragging around the blocks be harder?

run_script wrote:

(Mockup by stickfiregames)

Raytracing wrote:

It would be nice if there was a button too switch too scratch 2.0 (In my opinion I don't really like the size of padding.)

PokemonDude21 wrote:

Guys, what are you talking about on this thread?! The Scratch Team works so hard on making Scratch 3.0 and you all complain about it?! That's rude of you!

PokemonDude21 wrote:

Why do you all need to go wild about this guys?!

MasterOfTheTiger wrote:

wWSunPandaWw wrote:

Honeybee_ wrote:

wWSunPandaWw wrote:

The bigger blocks are not for Scratch 3.0 to be aimed at younger children, they're bigger so they'll be more accessible to mobile users, since coding on Mobile devices will be possible in 3.0.

Yes, but ask yourself:
Who uses tablets/iPads? Young kids
Who doesn't use them? Older kids — we in general have our own computers.

But what about things like Phones and iPods? Older kids use those. They're smaller than tablets and iPads, so therefore, wouldn't dragging around the blocks be harder?

iPhones and iPods (why did you just mention the evil Apple and not Android!!??) and other mobile devices (like phones) will not be supported in Scratch 3.0 upon initial release.

PokemonDude21 wrote:

Why do you all need to go wild about this guys?!

PokemonDude21 wrote:

Guys, what are you talking about on this thread?! The Scratch Team works so hard on making Scratch 3.0 and you all complain about it?! That's rude of you!

run_script wrote:

Please make sure all your posts are respectful, and that this thread is a list of ideas and suggestions and not a rant

miniepicness wrote:

PokemonDude21 wrote:

Why do you all need to go wild about this guys?!

Because the suggestions forum is for doing this

stymphalianbirb* wrote:

Thanks for the feedback! This is great. : )

run_script wrote:

stymphalianbirb* wrote:

Thanks for the feedback! This is great. : )

Do you think an option like the one in the image in the first post of this thread: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/299287/ is likely? In the preview FAQ, they said that larger blocks would make it easier to use, but you could still have that as the default option and be able to change it if you don't find it easier

stymphalianbirb* wrote:

run_script wrote:

stymphalianbirb* wrote:

Thanks for the feedback! This is great. : )

Do you think an option like the one in the image in the first post of this thread: https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/299287/ is likely? In the preview FAQ, they said that larger blocks would make it easier to use, but you could still have that as the default option and be able to change it if you don't find it easier

I'm not sure.

Solmux wrote:

I have an idea.

Scratch 3.0 detects if you're using a computer or iPad or something, and it will set the defaults.

For computer, the blocks will be smaller.
For mobile, the blocks will be bigger.

I don't know if this is possible..

Ryrie36 wrote:

Solmux wrote:

I have an idea.

Scratch 3.0 detects if you're using a computer or iPad or something, and it will set the defaults.

For computer, the blocks will be smaller.
For mobile, the blocks will be bigger.

I don't know if this is possible..

I had the exact sam idea!