☕ >>Tea Table - A Team Competition<< ☕

PokemonScratch101

Judging Rubric - Round 1 of Tea Table

Team: Herbal Tea
Judged by: @PokemonScratch101

Design: 7.5/20
2/2 - Consistent design and artwork, of the same style
0/2 - Included a thumbnail
1/5 - Artwork was complete and every object was drawn (and it resembles the object)
.5/1 - Visually appealing project
4/10 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes:
Love the concept, not complete, a very smooth animation

Functionality: 10/20
2/10 - The project worked, and it is a Rube Goldberg Machine
2/2 - Was not buggy, and project worked consistently and reliably (run the project at least 3 times)
6/8 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
Notes:

Creativity: 10/20
10/20 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes:

Teamwork: 77.5/20
2/5 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (1 point per member)
1/5 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (1 point per member)
2.5/5 - Constantly active (Did the team have to be constantly reminded? Deduct how many reminders were given.)
2/5 - Communication was effective
Notes:

Completion: 3.5/20
2/10 - 5 aspects of motion (2 points per aspect)
1/3 - Includes realistic setting
.5/1 - Includes team's colors
0/1 - Includes logo/intro/design (any/or)
0/2 - Includes (thorough) explanation
0/2 - Includes an Easter egg
.5/1 - Finished on the correct due date and submitted in proper format
Notes:
I love it, it's very neat, but not very realistic

Last edited by PokemonScratch101 (Dec. 31, 2017 16:31:39)

-FrozenFlame-

Judging Rubric - Round 3 of Tea Table

Team:
Judged by:

Design: /24
/12 - Up to judge's interpretation
/7 - Artwork enhances the quality of the project
/3 - Design style is uniform and suitable for the type of project
/1 - Included team's colors (can be apparent through intro)
/1 - Visually pleasing
Notes:

Functionality: /24
/10 - The game works no matter what gibberish you throw at it.
/9 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
/3 - It is a game
/2 - All the functions mentioned work as expected
Notes:

Creativity: /22
/22 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes:

Teamwork: /20
/10 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (assign point value in percentage)
/7 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (assign point value in percentage)
/3 - At least 70% of the project's work is the team's work
Notes:

Completion: /30
/8 - Instructions in game
/8 - At least two endings
/5 - A menu
/3 - A representation of a score
/2 - Colors from team color scheme (can also be apparent through relevant intro)
/2 - Submitted on April 14
/2 - Submitted before or on April 21
/0 - Submitted by April 23 5 PM UTC
Notes:

– Extra Credit in Completion Category
/1 - Easter Egg included
/2 - Over 8 different endings
/1 - Used an engine from Round 2
/1 - Used a different team's engine from Round 2

Total: /120

Last edited by -FrozenFlame- (April 23, 2018 03:43:43)

PokemonScratch101

-FrozenFlame- wrote:
Judging Rubric - Round 3 of Tea Table

Team: Herbal
Judged by: PS101

Design: 12/24
4/12 - Up to judge's interpretation - definitely could be better
6/7 - Artwork enhances the quality of the project
1.5/3 - Design style is uniform and suitable for the type of project - eh, it's okay
0/1 - Included team's colors (can be apparent through intro) - there's none
0.5/1 - Visually pleasing - can i give a half point?
Notes:

Functionality: 12/24
5/10 - The game works no matter what gibberish you throw at it. - not really.
6/9 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?) - can't understand
1/3 - It is a game - eh
0/2 - All the functions mentioned work as expected - uhh
Notes: After I reset, it doesn't work at times

Creativity: 11/22
11/22 - Up to judge's interpretation - meh, half points for effort
Notes:

Teamwork: 3/20
2/10 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (assign point value in percentage) - 1 member.
1/7 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (assign point value in percentage) - one person
0/3 - At least 70% of the project's work is the team's work - one person
Notes:

Completion: 9/30
4/8 - Instructions in game - sorta
0/8 - At least two endings - i don't see any
3/5 - A menu - just a play button
0/3 - A representation of a score - no
0/2 - Colors from team color scheme (can also be apparent through relevant intro)
0/2 - Submitted on April 14 - no
2/2 - Submitted before or on April 21
0/0 - Submitted by April 23 5 PM UTC
Notes:

– Extra Credit in Completion Category
0/1 - Easter Egg included
0/2 - Over 8 different endings
0/1 - Used an engine from Round 2
0/1 - Used a different team's engine from Round 2

Total: 47/120 (i think)

PokemonScratch101

-FrozenFlame- wrote:
Judging Rubric - Round 3 of Tea Table

Team: White
Judged by: PS101

Design: /24
12/12 - Up to judge's interpretation
7/7 - Artwork enhances the quality of the project
3/3 - Design style is uniform and suitable for the type of project
1/1 - Included team's colors (can be apparent through intro)
1/1 - Visually pleasing
Notes: Really good (should be featured)

Functionality: 24/24
10/10 - The game works no matter what gibberish you throw at it.
9/9 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
3/3 - It is a game
2/2 - All the functions mentioned work as expected
Notes:

Creativity: 22/22
22/22 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes:

Teamwork: 20/20
10/10 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (assign point value in percentage)
7/7 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (assign point value in percentage)
3/3 - At least 70% of the project's work is the team's work
Notes:

Completion: /2730
8/8 - Instructions in game
8/8 - At least two endings
5/5 - A menu
0/3 - A representation of a score
2/2 - Colors from team color scheme (can also be apparent through relevant intro)
2/2 - Submitted on April 14
2/2 - Submitted before or on April 21
0/0 - Submitted by April 23 5 PM UTC
Notes:

– Extra Credit in Completion Category
/1 - Easter Egg included
2/2 - Over 8 different endings
/1 - Used an engine from Round 2
/1 - Used a different team's engine from Round 2
idk
Total: /120 i can't math

Last edited by PokemonScratch101 (May 2, 2018 23:29:17)

-FrozenFlame-

Judging Rubric - Round 3 of Tea Table

Team: White Tea Team
Judged by: -FrozenFlame-

Design: 18/24
9/12 - Up to judge's interpretation
6/7 - Artwork enhances the quality of the project
1/3 - Design style is uniform and suitable for the type of project
1/1 - Included team's colors (can be apparent through intro)
1/1 - Visually pleasing
Notes: I like how you can move the panel to see the art. Sometimes it is vector, sometimes it isn't. The style is kinda inconsistent, which makes it lose some points.

Functionality: 24/24
10/10 - The game works no matter what gibberish you throw at it.
9/9 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
3/3 - It is a game
2/2 - All the functions mentioned work as expected
Notes: Nice work on the code! Didn't catch any flaws.

Creativity: 15/22
15/22 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: I love the idea of a text adventure! I do have to take off a couple points, however, for basically copying something that has already been made.

Teamwork: 10/20
7/10 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (assign point value in percentage)
2/7 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (assign point value in percentage)
1/3 - At least 70% of the project's work is the team's work
Notes: It seems like this game is extremely similar to https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/201282669 , a work of a teammate's own project/game. I'm not sure how to count this. Also, only one person seemed to actually be working while the others just had some titles.

Completion: 29/30
7/8 - Instructions in game
8/8 - At least two endings
5/5 - A menu
1/3 - A representation of a score
2/2 - Colors from team color scheme (can also be apparent through relevant intro)
2/2 - Submitted on April 14
2/2 - Submitted before or on April 21
0/0 - Submitted by April 23 5 PM UTC
Notes: It may be helpful to provide literal instructions on how to play the game, but good work on meeting the expectations. The score also doesn't make a lot of sense but it exists.

– Extra Credit in Completion Category
0/1 - Easter Egg included
2/2 - Over 8 different endings
0/1 - Used an engine from Round 2
0/1 - Used a different team's engine from Round 2

Total: 96/120

-FrozenFlame-

Judging Rubric - Round 3 of Tea Table

Team: Herbal
Judged by: flame

Design: 12/24
5/12 - Up to judge's interpretation
5/7 - Artwork enhances the quality of the project
1/3 - Design style is uniform and suitable for the type of project
0/1 - Included team's colors (can be apparent through intro)
1/1 - Visually pleasing
Notes: Good start but otherwise lacking. I like the pixel figure

Functionality: 5/24
0/10 - The game works no matter what gibberish you throw at it.
3/9 - Up to judge's interpretation (Was it well revised and efficiently coded?)
1/3 - It is a game
1/2 - All the functions mentioned work as expected
Notes: Nothing is working yet except arrow keys.

Creativity: 14/22
14/22 - Up to judge's interpretation
Notes: I'm unsure about the complete idea, so this is difficult to give a grade. however in general, platformers are not very original. scrolling is kinda cool tho.

Teamwork: 4/20
2/10 - All 5 members have contributed in one way or another (assign point value in percentage)
1/7 - All 5 members were dedicated to working (assign point value in percentage)
1/3 - At least 70% of the project's work is the team's work
Notes: no team effort here. just one person.

Completion: 4/30
0/8 - Instructions in game
0/8 - At least two endings
3/5 - A menu
0/3 - A representation of a score
0/2 - Colors from team color scheme (can also be apparent through relevant intro)
0/2 - Submitted on April 14
1/2 - Submitted before or on April 21
0/0 - Submitted by April 23 5 PM UTC
Notes: yeah.. good start though! also i gave 1/2 on deadline because you told me ahead of time.

– Extra Credit in Completion Category
0/1 - Easter Egg included
0/2 - Over 8 different endings
0/1 - Used an engine from Round 2
0/1 - Used a different team's engine from Round 2

Total: 39/120

-FrozenFlame-

leafstormthewarrior

MegaByteCorporations wrote:
-HOT- wrote:
Maybe he means “from the teams there is one project??”
Pretty sure he meant “is therw still time”

I think he said something related to a tomcat

Discuss Scratch