GrahamSH wrote:

It's kinda like school, except it’s actually fun!

TheEnderQueen wrote:

tfw you accidentally close your shop's topic

hellounicorns2 wrote:

GrahamSH wrote:

It's kinda like school, except it’s actually fun!

xD

GrahamSH wrote:

you said that. btw, the original comment “chain” where we talked about it was like 65 comments

hellounicorns2 wrote:

I’ve managed to never do it, even when I’m mainly on iPad. Hope your shop gets reopened soon. Also, due to a bug in forum software you can still edit your posts. Edit the main post with https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/3056488/edit/

TheEnderQueen wrote:

i already reported the first post asking for it to return lol

hellounicorns2 wrote:

Yea but you can edit it to let people know why it was closed

President: CuteKawaii69
Vice President: PercyJackson217 (they are poppybunny’s brother, though)
Secretary: Open.

Owner: Hellounicorns2
President: CuteKawaii69
Vice President: PercyJackson218
Secretary: Ncro2005 (if they choose to do so. They will be placed back at Head of Shops when Poppybunny comes back*)
Head Of Shops: GrahamSH (Same as above, they will return to normal positions once Poppybunny returns*)
Head if judges: non existent (until all comes back to normal)

hellounicorns2 wrote:

Apparently Poppybunny is taking a break from scratch . This is kinda bit of a problem please voice your opinion on what should happen. Also, presidents going inactive is pretty big, so yeah. I’m not gonna rewrite what I said in the ncro2005 scenario, but yeah, similar options.
Secretary: Ncro2005 (if they choose to do so. They will be placed back at Head of Shops when Poppybunny comes back*)

hellounicorns2 wrote:

*snip*
So, please voice your opinions on whether it is ok for Poppybunny to go inactive (without mentioning it on the main SPA forum) and what actions should be taken.
*Subject to poppybunny retaining their position.

ncro2005 wrote:

I'm okay with this.

Woofless04 wrote:

[
Where should we voice our opinions?

hellounicorns2 wrote:

Apparently Poppybunny is taking a break from scratch . This is kinda bit of a problem please voice your opinion on what should happen. Also, presidents going inactive is pretty big, so yeah. I’m not gonna rewrite what I said in the ncro2005 scenario, but yeah, similar options. The thing here is the line of succession ish thing. So, according to spa law we should have the following:

President: CuteKawaii69
Vice President: PercyJackson217 (they are poppybunny’s brother, though)
Secretary: Open.

So I will reshuffle everything a bit.

Owner: Hellounicorns2
President: CuteKawaii69
Vice President: PercyJackson218
Secretary: Ncro2005 (if they choose to do so. They will be placed back at Head of Shops when Poppybunny comes back*)
Head Of Shops: GrahamSH (Same as above, they will return to normal positions once Poppybunny returns*)
Head if judges: non existent (until all comes back to normal)

So, please voice your opinions on whether it is ok for Poppybunny to go inactive (without mentioning it on the main SPA forum) and what actions should be taken.
*Subject to poppybunny retaining their position.

doodthedoodthedood wrote:

i know this is alot to ask, but can you put my shop in the for shops. I have been in SPA for almost a week

hellounicorns2 wrote:

ncro2005 wrote:

I'm okay with this.

Ok, what is your opinion on what should happen to poppybunny?

Woofless04 wrote:

Where should we voice our opinions?

Here.

ncro2005 wrote:

Hmm, that's a good question. Well first, we need to see if CuteKawaii69 is up for taking control of it b/c we need to ensure stability. If CuteKawaii69 isn't interested, we will ask the same thing to PercyJackson218. If they say no as well, I would take charge. @poppybunny should be able to take back their position upon their return, but if it has been quite a while of their “bit of a break” (say almost a month), we could hold a special election.

I understand @poppybunny wanting to take a break, and we should respect that; but acknowledge that they said “a bit of a break” and it shouldn't be extensive due to the average interpretation of time of “a bit” being brief.

In conclusion, I think almost a month would be a fair amount of time before we should take action that would permanently affect their current term of SPA presidency.

7.1: Holidays can be taken for as long as that person likes
7.1.1: If that person is president their deputy should assume charge and run the association while the president is away.

hellounicorns2 wrote:

ncro2005 wrote:

Hmm, that's a good question. Well first, we need to see if CuteKawaii69 is up for taking control of it b/c we need to ensure stability. If CuteKawaii69 isn't interested, we will ask the same thing to PercyJackson218. If they say no as well, I would take charge. @poppybunny should be able to take back their position upon their return, but if it has been quite a while of their “bit of a break” (say almost a month), we could hold a special election.

I understand @poppybunny wanting to take a break, and we should respect that; but acknowledge that they said “a bit of a break” and it shouldn't be extensive due to the average interpretation of time of “a bit” being brief.

In conclusion, I think almost a month would be a fair amount of time before we should take action that would permanently affect their current term of SPA presidency.

Nice interpretation ! The only problem is with the stuff in bold.

7.1: Holidays can be taken for as long as that person likes
7.1.1: If that person is president their deputy should assume charge and run the association while the president is away.

Is this classified as a holiday?

hellounicorns2 wrote:

doodthedoodthedood wrote:

i know this is alot to ask, but can you put my shop in the for shops. I have been in SPA for almost a week

I’m sorry, will be updated tomorrow morning (I’m supposed to be asleep).

doodthedoodthedood wrote:

what time is it for you now

ncro2005 wrote:

Well… (i'm assuming by holiday you mean vacation) Sort of. But remember, this a important role and they said “a bit”. When someone specifies how long they will be gone, you would expect them to come back around the time specified; but we should always give a little more rope (if you know what i'm saying), which I did in my earlier statement.