set [num2 v] to (pick random (1) to (100))
set [num1 v] to (pick random (num2) to (100))
say (join (num1) (join [ minus ] (join (num2) (join [ equals ] ((num1) - (num2)))))) for (2) secs
set [num2 v] to (pick random (1) to (10))
set [num1 v] to ((num2) * (pick random (1) to (10)))
say (join (num1) (join [ divide ] (join (num2) (join [ equals ] ((num1) / (num2)))))) for (2) secs

when green flag clicked
set [Num1 v] to (pick random (1) to (100))
set [Num2 v] to (pick random (1) to (100))
if <(Num1) > (Num2)> then
set [Answer v] to ((Num1) - (Num2))
else
set [Answer v] to ((Num2) - (Num1))
end

([abs v] of ((Num 1) - (Num 2)))
(round ((Num 1) / (Num 2)))

wookie184 wrote:

For minus the best would be:

when green flag clicked
set [Num1 v] to (pick random (1) to (100))
set [Num2 v] to (pick random (1) to (100))
if <(Num1) > (Num2)> then
set [Answer v] to ((Num1) - (Num2))
else
set [Answer v] to ((Num2) - (Num1))
end

Please say if you want me to make one for division

set [Result v] to (pick random (1) to (10))
set [Numerator v] to (pick random (1) to (10))
set [Denominator v] to ((Numerator) * (Result))

cs222885 wrote:

I don't think any of your ideas work. Please check out my project and see if I did anything wrong.

deck26 wrote:

cs222885 wrote:

I don't think any of your ideas work. Please check out my project and see if I did anything wrong.

So which project is it? Is it even shared?

if <(Time) = <[60] > []>> then

end

deck26 wrote:

Well at the moment you deliberately set number2 to be at least as big as number1. So you're going to do something like ask what is 25 - 35 but then you ask what is 35 - 25. You KNOW the second number can't be smaller than the first so you only need to ask what is number2 - number1.

Your block

if <(Time) = <[60] > []>> then

end

is unlikely to be what you want. 60 is always greater than 0 so the right hand part evaluates as true which will be treated as 1 when you check against Time. In any case, as far as I can see you only set Time to the timer's value before you ask the question so it's not giving you any test of how long they took to answer unless you're resetting Time somewhere else.

As far as I can see you haven't done the division yet.

deck26 wrote:

https://scratch.mit.edu/projects/212292712/ - I've only remixed the subtraction. Since your on-screen variables expected number1 to be the larger I switched the logic. I've removed the chance to try again with the same question which seems unnecessary and is going to give problems with the time limit.