Discuss Scratch

MegaApuTurkUltra
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Scratch 3.0

+1 for {[hello world] contains [world]}

Last edited by MegaApuTurkUltra (Aug. 27, 2017 21:18:37)

kingof555
Scratcher
100+ posts

Scratch 3.0

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

+1 for {[hello world] contains [world]}
it already exists in Scratch 3.0 GUI.
walkcycle
Scratcher
500+ posts

Scratch 3.0

kingof555 wrote:

it already exists in Scratch 3.0 GUI.
yes, but it is ‘hello’ contains ‘world’ not ‘hello world’ contains ‘world’
Sheep_maker
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Scratch 3.0

kingof555 wrote:

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

+1 for {[hello world] contains [world]}
it already exists in Scratch 3.0 GUI.
MATU is supporting
<[hello world] contains [world]?::#59C059> // returns true
the current block has
<[hello] contains [world]?::#59C059> // returns false
kingof555
Scratcher
100+ posts

Scratch 3.0

Sheep_maker wrote:

kingof555 wrote:

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

+1 for {[hello world] contains [world]}
it already exists in Scratch 3.0 GUI.
MATU is supporting
<[hello world] contains [world]?::#59C059> // returns true
the current block has
<[hello] contains [world]?::#59C059> // returns false
oh…still pretty close/
MinecraftM153
Scratcher
100+ posts

Scratch 3.0

ZZ9PluralZAlpha wrote:

Would anyone like to see screenshots of the 1.4, 2.0 and 3.0 editors to compare their looks?
I do!
Charles12310
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Scratch 3.0

Hmm, I'm wondering whether this will get added soon:

(letters () to () of string [] :: operators )

(items () to () of list [list v] :: list )

(custom reporter :: custom )
kingof555
Scratcher
100+ posts

Scratch 3.0

MinecraftM153 wrote:

ZZ9PluralZAlpha wrote:

Would anyone like to see screenshots of the 1.4, 2.0 and 3.0 editors to compare their looks?
I do!
me too.
Sheep_maker
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Scratch 3.0

Charles12310 wrote:

Hmm, I'm wondering whether this will get added soon:

(letters () to () of string [] :: operators )

(items () to () of list [list v] :: list )

(custom reporter :: custom )
They never were confirmed; supposedly each block requires many in-depth discussions on every small detail and fixes to every little problem so it can be used/learned by Scratch's target audience in the best way possible
Ceo_
Scratcher
500+ posts

Scratch 3.0

They changed something but I can't tell what exactly…

infinitytec
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Scratch 3.0

Ceo_ wrote:

They changed something but I can't tell what exactly…

I can't decide if I like it or not… It's different.
They tried to do something like this with 2.0, but this one's better.

EDIT:
The order is weird. Maybe:
  • Events
  • Control
  • Motion
  • Looks
  • Sound
  • Pen
  • Sensing
  • Operators
  • Data

Last edited by infinitytec (Aug. 28, 2017 23:19:23)

TheUltimatum
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Scratch 3.0

infinitytec wrote:

Ceo_ wrote:

They changed something but I can't tell what exactly…

oops should have snipped this.
I can't decide if I like it or not… It's different.
They tried to do something like this with 2.0, but this one's better.

EDIT:
The order is weird. Maybe:
  • Events
  • Control
  • Motion
  • Looks
  • Sound
  • Pen
  • Sensing
  • Operators
  • Data
I like it… Makes it so much easier to get to blocks.

Last edited by TheUltimatum (Aug. 28, 2017 23:23:51)

chooper100
Scratcher
500+ posts

Scratch 3.0

I'm not sure whether the categories are in the best order in the new style

imo it's more logical to me that events should go at the top of everything as those are the start of every script

EDIT: Ninja'd by infinitytec
Yes, I agree that your proposed order is much better than the current one

Last edited by chooper100 (Aug. 28, 2017 23:22:29)

Sheep_maker
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Scratch 3.0

infinitytec wrote:

They tried to do something like this with 2.0, but this one's better.
Indeed; from the Wiki the Experimental Viewer and the Prealpha Interface. It didn't have the category labels though

EDIT: If we're still on the topic of category colours, Scratch 2.0 used to have different colours as well

Last edited by Sheep_maker (Aug. 28, 2017 23:25:52)

TheUltimatum
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Scratch 3.0

I do admit the order is a bit wierd I think they should order it based on the most used blocks in https://scratch.mit.edu/statistics/#block-distribution-chart
TheUltimatum
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Scratch 3.0

chooper100 wrote:

I'm not sure whether the categories are in the best order in the new style

imo it's more logical to me that events should go at the top of everything as those are the start of every script

EDIT: Ninja'd by infinitytec
Yes, I agree that your proposed order is much better than the current one
I agree with you as well. Events should definitely be on top.
chooper100
Scratcher
500+ posts

Scratch 3.0

Sheep_maker wrote:

infinitytec wrote:

They tried to do something like this with 2.0, but this one's better.
Indeed; from the Wiki the Experimental Viewer and the Prealpha Interface. It didn't have the category labels though
Could we all take a moment to appreciate the fact that they did not use those designs in the final Scratch 2?
TheUltimatum
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Scratch 3.0

chooper100 wrote:

Sheep_maker wrote:

infinitytec wrote:

They tried to do something like this with 2.0, but this one's better.
Indeed; from the Wiki the Experimental Viewer and the Prealpha Interface. It didn't have the category labels though
Could we all take a moment to appreciate the fact that they did not use those designs in the final Scratch 2?
Ugh… yes especially prealpha.
superben100
Scratcher
1000+ posts

Scratch 3.0

chooper100 wrote:

Sheep_maker wrote:

infinitytec wrote:

They tried to do something like this with 2.0, but this one's better.
Indeed; from the Wiki the Experimental Viewer and the Prealpha Interface. It didn't have the category labels though
Could we all take a moment to appreciate the fact that they did not use those designs in the final Scratch 2?
Yes…..
chooper100
Scratcher
500+ posts

Scratch 3.0

Also a new block has been added to the motion category:

glide (1) secs to [mouse pointer v] :: motion

Somewhat limited impact compared to other additions, but nevertheless a step in the right direction

Last edited by chooper100 (Aug. 28, 2017 23:30:49)

Powered by DjangoBB