These are the 12 Scratch emojis! They look pretty cool, huh? Imagine how much better they would be if they could be big and small.

To clarify, this would use the BBCode tags.

Discuss.

Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

[translation]Semi-support[/translation]

I don't really see why we'd need them…? No one (AFAIK) besides you has complained about not having big emojis…

kenny2scratch wrote:

Ehhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

[translation]Semi-support[/translation]

I don't really see why we'd need them…? No one (AFAIK) besides you has complained about not having big emojis…

They would help you be more expressive. e.g. in your siggy (for all sorts of reasons), a small winking emoji next to <offtopic> text, big ones to show how you feel at the top of your post…

How big? I don't think these emojis would work bigger. they're not that detailed. Maybe if you could use the newer ones?

But I also don't think it's needed that much.

I mean, yeah, support, because you have to close a tag to do a smiley ;) but then that means that massive emoticon spam could become a thing, so that knocks me back down to a semi-support…

I can't really say I support - emoticon spam is already a problem and we don't need big emoticon spam!

No Support, we don't need big emojis. It would cause spam.

LionHeart70 wrote:

I can't really say I support - emoticon spam is already a problem and we don't need big emoticon spam!

Semi-Support…

I like the idea but I agree with LionHeart70's post above!

LionHeart70 wrote:

I can't really say I support - emoticon spam is already a problem and we don't need big emoticon spam!

I suppose so. But it can easily be reported. No different to regular emoji spam.

cul8er wrote:

LionHeart70 wrote:

I can't really say I support - emoticon spam is already a problem and we don't need big emoticon spam!

I suppose so. But it can easily be reported. No different to regular emoji spam.

Except that due to the increased size of the emojis, it could take you longer to scroll down to the report button.

Wheatly_Scratcher wrote:

cul8er wrote:

LionHeart70 wrote:

I can't really say I support - emoticon spam is already a problem and we don't need big emoticon spam!

I suppose so. But it can easily be reported. No different to regular emoji spam.

Except that due to the increased size of the emojis, it could take you longer to scroll down to the report button.

I think the size won't be that much bigger, like 100000000000000x100000000000000.

Although they can be larger to be expressed differently, many websites/services have a singular size for emojis.'

Perhaps using the big and small tags in BBCode can be a partial solution?

Austinato wrote:

Although they can be larger to be expressed differently, many websites/services have a singular size for emojis.'

Perhaps using the big and small tags in BBCode can be a partial solution?

Support for this, but the big should only be a few times bigger (since otherwise emoji walls would be even more annoying).

Austinato wrote:

Although they can be larger to be expressed differently, many websites/services have a singular size for emojis.'

Perhaps using the big and small tags in BBCode can be a partial solution?

That's the suggestion!

monstermash3 wrote:

Support for this, but the big should only be a few times bigger (since otherwise emoji walls would be even more annoying).

Agreed.

Wheatly_Scratcher wrote:

cul8er wrote:

LionHeart70 wrote:

I can't really say I support - emoticon spam is already a problem and we don't need big emoticon spam!

I suppose so. But it can easily be reported. No different to regular emoji spam.

Except that due to the increased size of the emojis, it could take you longer to scroll down to the report button.

If somebody was trying to make some post harder to report, they'd spam with Scratchblocks to lag them. Not big emoticons. Besides, this difference is negligible. Especially when you can use the actual scroll bar to scroll to the bottom of a page instantly.

monstermash3 wrote:

Support for this, but the big should only be a few times bigger (since otherwise emoji walls would be even more annoying).

Yeah.

cul8er wrote:

Austinato wrote:

Although they can be larger to be expressed differently, many websites/services have a singular size for emojis.'

Perhaps using the big and small tags in BBCode can be a partial solution?

That's the suggestion!

Oh, when I posted that, I don't remember this being part of the original post:

cul8er wrote:

To clarify, this would use the BBCode tags.

Anyways, alright!

Austinato wrote:

Oh, when I posted that, I don't remember this being part of the original post:

It wasn't explicitly stated before but it was my intention.

-RandomGuy- wrote:

No support, in my opinion, emoji's are useless and kinda annoying.

I kinda like emoticons, just not the amount of how misused they are. Someone tell about 99% of people in the announcements forum that you only need a few emoticons, not 1000.

cul8er wrote:

Austinato wrote:

Oh, when I posted that, I don't remember this being part of the original post:

It wasn't explicitly stated before but it was my intention.

Oh, okay.