jromagnoli wrote:

stickfiregames wrote:

Here's one that uses brightness more than the current ones, combined with NitroCipher's flat style idea for 3.0 (current on the left):

I think this should be OK but are variables and events too similar here? Maybe I should make variables closer to lists since they're in the same category.

It would be good if some people with other forms of colourblindness saw this. Does anyone here happen to know anyone else who has it?

The problem with that is that it hurts your eyes if you aren't colorblind.

stickfiregames wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

stickfiregames wrote:

Here's one that uses brightness more than the current ones, combined with NitroCipher's flat style idea for 3.0 (current on the left):

I think this should be OK but are variables and events too similar here? Maybe I should make variables closer to lists since they're in the same category.

It would be good if some people with other forms of colourblindness saw this. Does anyone here happen to know anyone else who has it?

The problem with that is that it hurts your eyes if you aren't colorblind.

Which ones? I find them all OK.

jromagnoli wrote:

stickfiregames wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

stickfiregames wrote:

Here's one that uses brightness more than the current ones, combined with NitroCipher's flat style idea for 3.0 (current on the left):

I think this should be OK but are variables and events too similar here? Maybe I should make variables closer to lists since they're in the same category.

It would be good if some people with other forms of colourblindness saw this. Does anyone here happen to know anyone else who has it?

The problem with that is that it hurts your eyes if you aren't colorblind.

Which ones? I find them all OK.

The color/contrast adjusted ones.

MathlyCat wrote:

instead of memorizing by color, your weak point, do it by the words.

kenny2scratch wrote:

MathlyCat wrote:

instead of memorizing by color, your weak point, do it by the words.

Too late, I've been working with Scratch for a long time and I still go by color. Also, the blocks in the project (e.g. move 10 steps then change effect) look identical which confuses me.

MathlyCat wrote:

-snipped quote-
How is it too late?

You can always try and do it.
Though I'm still supporting a color blind version… (may or may not want to use it just because it looks different)

{
  "Motion": 0x4a7c,
  "Looks": 0x70cc,
  "Sound": 0x89797b,
  "Pen": 0x9e7600,
  "Events": 0xb78b2d,
  "Control": 0xe1a819,
  "Sensing": 0x7999e5,
  "Operators": 0x89797e,
  "Data": 0xc49300,
  "More Blocks": 0x161d2d,
  "Parameter": 0x465884,
  "List": 0x8a6c26,
  "Extension": 0x4b4a60
}

move (10) steps ::#004a7c
say [Hello!] for (2) secs ::#0070cc
play sound [meow v] ::#89797b
clear ::#9e7600
set [var v] to [0] ::#c49300
add [thing] to [list v] ::#8a6c26
broadcast [message1 v] ::#b78b2d
wait (1) secs ::#e1a819
ask (join [hello][world] ::#89797e) and wait ::#7999e5
custom (block ::#465884) ::#161d2d

customhacker wrote:

I suppose you could write the color out, but how would you separate it better?