jji10 wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

One problem for the age limit.
5 year old: AWW I CAN'T BE AN ADMIN!
*Clicks*
*clicks*
Age: 5
*clicks*
Age:17
Save.

You'd have to post your birth certificate. /s/
But seriously, maybe you have to agree to be honest in the age and stuff somewhere in the post. If you don't, you get sued.

jji10 wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

One problem for the age limit.
5 year old: AWW I CAN'T BE AN ADMIN!
*Clicks*
*clicks*
Age: 5
*clicks*
Age:17
Save.

You'd have to post your birth certificate. /s/
But seriously, maybe you have to agree to be honest in the age and stuff somewhere in the post. If you don't, you get sued.

awsome_guy_360 wrote:

jji10 wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

One problem for the age limit.
5 year old: AWW I CAN'T BE AN ADMIN!
*Clicks*
*clicks*
Age: 5
*clicks*
Age:17
Save.

You'd have to post your birth certificate. /s/
But seriously, maybe you have to agree to be honest in the age and stuff somewhere in the post. If you don't, you get sued.

True.

You enter your birth date in the account create correct? They can just base it off that. XD

awesome5185 wrote:

Imagine that… oh I'm imagining it. Scratch sueing a 5 year old. Plus, you do realise not everyone lives in the US.

awesome5185 wrote:

awsome_guy_360 wrote:

jji10 wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

One problem for the age limit.
5 year old: AWW I CAN'T BE AN ADMIN!
*Clicks*
*clicks*
Age: 5
*clicks*
Age:17
Save.

You'd have to post your birth certificate. /s/
But seriously, maybe you have to agree to be honest in the age and stuff somewhere in the post. If you don't, you get sued.

True.

You enter your birth date in the account create correct? They can just base it off that. XD

That's what I meant… they can fake that.

awsome_guy_360 wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

Imagine that… oh I'm imagining it. Scratch sueing a 5 year old. Plus, you do realise not everyone lives in the US.

Did everyone already forget that the person applying for a CM has to write a report to become one?

I don't mean to be rude or anything, but when was the last time you saw a 5 year old on the internet with good grammar? I think that'll give away the true age to the ST.

I mean, unless if there's a 14 yr with bad grammar. ._.

awesome5185 wrote:

Ok, well maybe a 12 year old could write it, being extraaa careful.

awsome_guy_360 wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

Ok, well maybe a 12 year old could write it, being extraaa careful.

(Forgetting ST checking forum/comment history?)

awesome5185 wrote:

awsome_guy_360 wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

Ok, well maybe a 12 year old could write it, being extraaa careful.

(Forgetting ST checking forum/comment history?)

No, they could just never give away age? I mean I havn't.

Tymewalk's OP wrote:

That's good and all, but what if someone fakes it, becomes a CM, and then wreaks havoc on the site?

I propose to fix this, another role be created: “Community Mod In-Training”, or CMITs. During this time, they would get lesser powers than CMs (i.e, they can not actually delete posts). They are still allowed to soft-delete these posts.

Once a CMIT has been in good standing and proved they can be responsible, they may then be promoted by the ST to full CM.

awesome5185 wrote:

awsome_guy_360 wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

Ok, well maybe a 12 year old could write it, being extraaa careful.

(Forgetting ST checking forum/comment history?)

No, they could just never give away age? I mean I havn't.

jromagnoli wrote:

I think you would need verified parent/gaurdian approval. I don't think parents would want their kid becoming an admin and being exposed to potentially inappropriate content without their consent.

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

awsome_guy_360 wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

Ok, well maybe a 12 year old could write it, being extraaa careful.

(Forgetting ST checking forum/comment history?)

No, they could just never give away age? I mean I havn't.

jromagnoli wrote:

I think you would need verified parent/gaurdian approval. I don't think parents would want their kid becoming an admin and being exposed to potentially inappropriate content without their consent.

jji10 wrote:

You'd have to post your birth certificate.

jji10 wrote:

/s/

jji10 wrote:

But seriously, maybe you have to agree to be honest in the age and stuff somewhere in the post. If you don't, you get sued.

Austinato wrote:

jji10 wrote:

You'd have to post your birth certificate.

I see this as a bit personal in terms of just simply moderating. I understand legal compliance, but…

jji10 wrote:

/s/

What does this mean?

jji10 wrote:

But seriously, maybe you have to agree to be honest in the age and stuff somewhere in the post. If you don't, you get sued.

Yes, honesty would be the best, and simplest way to go. Of course, you could get more complicated and require documents and such (like a birth certificate) but yeah.

jji10 wrote:

Austinato wrote:

jji10 wrote:

You'd have to post your birth certificate.

I see this as a bit personal in terms of just simply moderating. I understand legal compliance, but…

jji10 wrote:

/s/

What does this mean?

jji10 wrote:

But seriously, maybe you have to agree to be honest in the age and stuff somewhere in the post. If you don't, you get sued.

Yes, honesty would be the best, and simplest way to go. Of course, you could get more complicated and require documents and such (like a birth certificate) but yeah.

/s/ shows sarcasm lol.

jji10 wrote:

Austinato wrote:

jji10 wrote:

/s/

What does this mean?

/s/ shows sarcasm lol.

Austinato wrote:

jji10 wrote:

Austinato wrote:

jji10 wrote:

/s/

What does this mean?

/s/ shows sarcasm lol.

Oh, okay, thanks for clarifying that. xD

awesome5185 wrote:

Austinato wrote:

jji10 wrote:

Austinato wrote:

jji10 wrote:

/s/

<offtopic>What does this mean?

/s/ shows sarcasm lol.

Oh, okay, thanks for clarifying that. xD

Well that was informative! /s/

jk that really was.</offtopic>

awesome5185 wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

awsome_guy_360 wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

Ok, well maybe a 12 year old could write it, being extraaa careful.

(Forgetting ST checking forum/comment history?)

No, they could just never give away age? I mean I havn't.

jromagnoli wrote:

I think you would need verified parent/gaurdian approval. I don't think parents would want their kid becoming an admin and being exposed to potentially inappropriate content without their consent.

*types up a fake report*

awsome_guy_360 wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

awsome_guy_360 wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

Ok, well maybe a 12 year old could write it, being extraaa careful.

(Forgetting ST checking forum/comment history?)

No, they could just never give away age? I mean I havn't.

jromagnoli wrote:

I think you would need verified parent/gaurdian approval. I don't think parents would want their kid becoming an admin and being exposed to potentially inappropriate content without their consent.

*types up a fake report*

You're really testing us, aren't you? XD