dvargasews wrote:

I think that you would need more inputs for some of the blocks, like

set skew effect to point x: (x  ::variables) y: (y  ::variables) relative to [sprite v] centered at line with [slope-intercept form y=(m  ::variables)x+(b  ::variables) v] to (percent  ::variables)%  ::looks

in order to specify…say…which to skew towards?

everything is relative to the center, always.

do you need that many variables for rotation?
case closed.

DerpyHead0 wrote:

go to x: () y: ()
point in direction (90 v)
set size to () %

set flip X to () % :: looks
set flip Y to () % :: looks
set squash X to () % :: looks
set squash Y to () % :: looks
set skew X to () % :: looks
set skew Y to () % :: looks

I have some better wordings for the last six blocks to make it more condensed in the Looks palette.

set [flip v][x v] to () % :: looks
set [flip v][y v] to () % :: looks
set [squash v][x v] to () % :: looks
set [squash v][y v] to () % :: looks
set [skew v][x v] to () % :: looks
set [skew v][y v] to () % :: looks
set [stretch v][x v] to () % :: looks // why not add stretch to these?
set [stretch v][y v] to () % :: looks

This would make it a single block, instead of six different ones.

kenny2scratch wrote:

DerpyHead0 wrote:

go to x: () y: ()
point in direction (90 v)
set size to () %

set flip X to () % :: looks
set flip Y to () % :: looks
set squash X to () % :: looks
set squash Y to () % :: looks
set skew X to () % :: looks
set skew Y to () % :: looks

I have some better wordings for the last six blocks to make it more condensed in the Looks palette.

set [flip v][x v] to () % :: looks
set [flip v][y v] to () % :: looks
set [squash v][x v] to () % :: looks
set [squash v][y v] to () % :: looks
set [skew v][x v] to () % :: looks
set [skew v][y v] to () % :: looks
set [stretch v][x v] to () % :: looks // why not add stretch to these?
set [stretch v][y v] to () % :: looks

This would make it a single block, instead of six different ones.

Stretch would make flip obsolete.

1a3c5e7g9i wrote:

DerpyHead0 wrote:

set flip X to () % :: looks
set flip Y to () % :: looks

Flip X

Flip Y

Isn't flipping (stretching) going to be in Scratch 3.0? (I'm looking for the source, please wait).

change horizontal stretch by (...)::looks
change vertical stretch by (...)::looks

Setting horizontal stretch to -100 would be the sprite reversed horizontally; 100 would be the normal layout.
Same for setting vertical stretch to -100.

I'd prefer this:

set stretch effect along the line: ()*x+()*y=() to ()%  ::looks

dvargasews wrote:

I'd prefer this:

set stretch effect along the line: ()*x+()*y=() to ()%  ::looks

too complicated, i don't even know how that works.
let's keep it the way everything else is in scratch, ok?

kenny2scratch wrote:

DerpyHead0 wrote:

go to x: () y: ()
point in direction (90 v)
set size to () %

set flip X to () % :: looks
set flip Y to () % :: looks
set squash X to () % :: looks
set squash Y to () % :: looks
set skew X to () % :: looks
set skew Y to () % :: looks

I have some better wordings for the last six blocks to make it more condensed in the Looks palette.

set [flip v][x v] to () % :: looks
set [flip v][y v] to () % :: looks
set [squash v][x v] to () % :: looks
set [squash v][y v] to () % :: looks
set [skew v][x v] to () % :: looks
set [skew v][y v] to () % :: looks
set [stretch v][x v] to () % :: looks // why not add stretch to these?
set [stretch v][y v] to () % :: looks

This would make it a single block, instead of six different ones.

Good idea, but if that's how it'll work normal size will have to be in there too. also i don't know what stretch is. if it's squash in reverse you could use negative squash.

BAP PAP BOMP

BOOMF

BUMP BOMP
CRASH
oh i hope it didn- CRASH yeah something definetly broke.

Semi-support, while hard to do, it's not impossible, and it may seem weird to new scracthers.

duckboycool wrote:

Semi-support, while hard to do, it's not impossible, and it may seem weird to new scracthers.

pixelate? mosaic? fisheye? most people don't even know what fisheye means!
These aren't useful in any way other than a joke video, but my idea is needed for one of the projects i'm working on. (also still good for a joke video)
there are already effects that i still think are weird and unnecessary, and I only ever use ghost, brightness, and color.

(i'm not trying to force anyone to support, i just wanna make that point.)

bip pap pang bump BOMP BAMP BOOM CRASH

pipipipipipipipipipipipipipipipip BOOM

bump pip pap

shoosh pap

bububububbbbump

pip

Sigton wrote:

MathlyCat wrote:

Why is other art software a non-viable option?

Cause it can't be automated in run time.
(Unless you make a lot of frames, but who's got time for that )

Sigton

My friend

p
pip
pap
pip
p

Support, as skew and stretch especially are interesting to me

because

because I kind of want to make a Super Mario Kart clone

Can you give me a link to an example project so I can get the scripts?

Davidedo wrote:

Can you give me a link to an example project so I can get the scripts?

They… don't exist, silly. That's why there's a suggestion topic.
At least read the first post in full before responding.

DerpyHead0 added a creative bump even though it hasn't seemed to be working, but will it work this time?

Support.

Like you mentioned in the OP it would be extremely useful for animations and 3Dimensional games. For the new scratchers, they can just experiment with it.

GOING TO TEH PORT OF SUP. {lol)