That would serve no purpose to my suggestion. I need a reference to show people that they changed their post, otherwise it will seems as if they were actually talking about something that they weren't.

BY147258369 wrote:

That would serve no purpose to my suggestion. I need a reference to show people that they changed their post, otherwise it will seems as if they were actually talking about something that they weren't.

You don't need to. Maybe add the edit log to be visible to the ST, so if the person bothers you by teasing and commenting, you can report them and ask the ST to look at the log. I mean, I don't want people seeing my spelling errors!

But still, semi support.

awesome5185 wrote:

BY147258369 wrote:

That would serve no purpose to my suggestion. I need a reference to show people that they changed their post, otherwise it will seems as if they were actually talking about something that they weren't.

You don't need to. Maybe add the edit log to be visible to the ST, so if the person bothers you by teasing and commenting, you can report them and ask the ST to look at the log. I mean, I don't want people seeing my spelling errors!

But still, semi support.

If you made spelling errors and fixed them in an edit, I'm positive nobody would judge you. We all make typos. The point is that the ST wouldn't need to have to do something to fix the situation, and people could just see.

duckboycool wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

BY147258369 wrote:

That would serve no purpose to my suggestion. I need a reference to show people that they changed their post, otherwise it will seems as if they were actually talking about something that they weren't.

You don't need to. Maybe add the edit log to be visible to the ST, so if the person bothers you by teasing and commenting, you can report them and ask the ST to look at the log. I mean, I don't want people seeing my spelling errors!

But still, semi support.

If you made spelling errors and fixed them in an edit, I'm positive nobody would judge you. We all make typos. The point is that the ST wouldn't need to have to do something to fix the situation, and people could just see.

But still, is this really nessasary? I know there are some people who do this, but as I suggested before, just report them. An alert is much more concerning than a triggered scratcher.

awesome5185 wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

What? How did I miss this! 100% support! This is needed badly and could help me with my posts, because sometimes I accidentally edit them and mess them up.

customhacker wrote:

Support! One time I cleared my whole shop posts by inserting an unsupported emoji. It took an hour to redo!

Ok I have a suggestion, you can only see your own edits. But not other people's.

No support.

How would you be able to view the edit log?

Sigton

Sigton wrote:

How would you be able to view the edit log?

Sigton

The OP says everyone, but I suggest only you and the ST.

Sigton wrote:

How would you be able to view the edit log?

Sigton

Presumably by hovering over this part v
Last edited by jromagnoli (Today 8:55:32)

Semi-support. It's highly likely that in an active thread, such post would be quoted and thus preserved - even if you edited it, you couldn't make the other person edit their quote of you.

braxbroscratcher wrote:

Semi-support. It's highly likely that in an active thread, such post would be quoted and thus preserved - even if you edited it, you couldn't make the other person edit their quote of you.

Yup, just like I said before…

Last edited by kaj Today (9:22:3)

awesome5185 wrote:

braxbroscratcher wrote:

Semi-support. It's highly likely that in an active thread, such post would be quoted and thus preserved - even if you edited it, you couldn't make the other person edit their quote of you.

Yup, just like I said before…

Nice, I think you actually fooled someone…
60 second rule ._.

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

braxbroscratcher wrote:

Semi-support. It's highly likely that in an active thread, such post would be quoted and thus preserved - even if you edited it, you couldn't make the other person edit their quote of you.

Yup, just like I said before…

Nice, I think you actually fooled someone…
60 second rule ._.

hah, please remove it from your post so they don't see..

OMG the 60 sec thing -_-

awesome5185 wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

braxbroscratcher wrote:

Semi-support. It's highly likely that in an active thread, such post would be quoted and thus preserved - even if you edited it, you couldn't make the other person edit their quote of you.

Yup, just like I said before…

Nice, I think you actually fooled someone…
60 second rule ._.

hah, please remove it from your post so they don't see..

OMG the 60 sec thing -_-

Someone created a topic in bugs and glitches about that.

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

braxbroscratcher wrote:

Semi-support. It's highly likely that in an active thread, such post would be quoted and thus preserved - even if you edited it, you couldn't make the other person edit their quote of you.

Yup, just like I said before…

Nice, I think you actually fooled someone…
60 second rule ._.

hah, please remove it from your post so they don't see..

OMG the 60 sec thing -_-

Someone created a topic in bugs and glitches about that.

lol

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

braxbroscratcher wrote:

Semi-support. It's highly likely that in an active thread, such post would be quoted and thus preserved - even if you edited it, you couldn't make the other person edit their quote of you.

Yup, just like I said before…

Nice, I think you actually fooled someone…
60 second rule ._.

hah, please remove it from your post so they don't see..

OMG the 60 sec thing -_-

Someone created a topic in bugs and glitches about that.

Heading right over… lol

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

braxbroscratcher wrote:

Semi-support. It's highly likely that in an active thread, such post would be quoted and thus preserved - even if you edited it, you couldn't make the other person edit their quote of you.

Yup, just like I said before…

Nice, I think you actually fooled someone…
60 second rule ._.

awesome5185 wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

braxbroscratcher wrote:

Semi-support. It's highly likely that in an active thread, such post would be quoted and thus preserved - even if you edited it, you couldn't make the other person edit their quote of you.

Yup, just like I said before…

Nice, I think you actually fooled someone…
60 second rule ._.

hah, please remove it from your post so they don't see..

OMG the 60 sec thing -_-

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

braxbroscratcher wrote:

Semi-support. It's highly likely that in an active thread, such post would be quoted and thus preserved - even if you edited it, you couldn't make the other person edit their quote of you.

Yup, just like I said before…

Nice, I think you actually fooled someone…
60 second rule ._.

hah, please remove it from your post so they don't see..

OMG the 60 sec thing -_-

Someone created a topic in bugs and glitches about that.

braxbroscratcher wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

braxbroscratcher wrote:

Semi-support. It's highly likely that in an active thread, such post would be quoted and thus preserved - even if you edited it, you couldn't make the other person edit their quote of you.

Yup, just like I said before…

Nice, I think you actually fooled someone…
60 second rule ._.

hah, please remove it from your post so they don't see..

OMG the 60 sec thing -_-

Someone created a topic in bugs and glitches about that.

lol

awesome5185 wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

jromagnoli wrote:

awesome5185 wrote:

braxbroscratcher wrote:

Semi-support. It's highly likely that in an active thread, such post would be quoted and thus preserved - even if you edited it, you couldn't make the other person edit their quote of you.

Yup, just like I said before…

Nice, I think you actually fooled someone…
60 second rule ._.

hah, please remove it from your post so they don't see..

OMG the 60 sec thing -_-

Someone created a topic in bugs and glitches about that.

Heading right over… lol

Lets get back on topic.

Digital_Gaming wrote:

-snip-

Please don't use the long amount of quotes.

I'm going to bump this to see what feedback it gets.

No support- usually an edit is for fixing spelling mistakes.

Semi-Support While it would help catch people who are mean then edit their posts, and it would be interesting to see old versions of threads that where revamped it would also take up storage space by someone rapidly editing their quote, someone could realize what they said was mean and make it nicer and most of the time it would be boring stuff such as fixing spelling.