Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

OKAY i want to make myself clear i was jokeing and am a jokester.


{I NEED HELP}

I need someone too fill me in with everything that has happened. I have played fnaf 1-3. A little bit of 4, but i dont know the story.

I need a summory of The silver eyes. And anything ive missed. Once im finished reading i will make my own theroies and contribute to the communite again.


{I HAVE BEEN HERE IN YEARS}


Thanks to @ FOR SUMMORIZING IT!


{name will be edited there when everythings read. THANKS!!!}

I can summarize it for you.
After 10 years, Charlie and her childhood friends revisit the Freddy Fazbear's Pizza they all went to when they were children. After figuring out it's still there and enter, they find out that everything is still there, but not as they used to be. Throughout the book, you will encounter plot twists, such as meeting a guy named Dave, one of Charlie's friends gets kidnapped by a Golden Bonnie suit, and the animatronics going haywire.
WILL CHARLIE SURVIVE???
Hope this helps.

Thanks, but it doesnt sound very clear too me. Can you put some more detail? like a timeline. i am not going to read the silver eyes

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Ugh. Funtime Freddy has faceplates. Does normal Freddy do? No. Does that make Funtime Freddy not Freddy because he has faceplates? No. It's the same exact thing with Toy Chica. Also, the building is FFP after FNAF 1. And, to mention it again, what other relevance could CPW be to the plot if the springlock suit isn't a Chica suit? Please read what I am saying.

I'd like to set things straight here.
First, I AM NOT DISAGREEING TO YOUR TYPE OF LOGIC. I NEVER SAID THAT. It's perfectly fine for there to be multiple Freddys with different actions. I've also been saying, for multiple times, that TOY CHICA DOES NOT HAVE FACEPLATES. I know there is only one Toy Chica. Have you even been paying attention?
Second, by saying that the FNAF 3 in-between night minigames are located in FNAF 1, you are basically saying that FNAF 1 comes before FNAF 2.
Finally, how does this have anything to do with my springlock theory?

Clearly you disagree or don't understand what I'm saying. Just in case you misunderstood, I don't think it IS Toy Chica, but I just think it is a variant of Chica/Toy Chica. I was pointing out the characteristic of Toy Chica, not pointing out Toy Chica itself. Also, I see what you are getting at. Remember, there are two Aftons. The real question is are you even paying attention to any of what I'm saying? I specifically said this: "what other relevance could CPW be to the plot if the springlock suit isn't a Chica suit?" It is fairly obvious it has to do with my arguments against your theory.

What I believe the other relevance that CPW could be to the plot is that that could be the place where Circus Baby used to be before CBPW. Would you think there is a coincidence that CPW has the same letters in CBPW, just that there is a B for Circus BABY?
Secondly, if you inspect this picture, this picture, this picture, and this picture, you will see Chica's Party World in the source code. And since these pictures have to do with Circus Baby, it means that Circus Baby was once in CPW.

What would be the point of naming it "Chica's Party World". And, the CPW source code wasn't until Ennard or the Bidybabs. Plus, the Bidybabs are barely connected to Baby. I mean, they are there with Baby just for the sake of being with Baby. Also, the CPW and CBPW name connection means nothing. It's just that pizza and party both begin with a p and Circus and Chica both begin with a c. It doesn't mean anything.

It was probably because the sole purpose for Chica's Party World was for Chica, NOT Circus Baby. Also, the Bidybab teaser has Circus Baby in the background as well if you brighten the image, so your Bidybab idea might not be correct.

Just to point it out, the suit has no nose (1, 2, 3). Still, practically every SL teaser was somewhat connected to Baby so your theory falls flat. Like I said, it happened around the Bidybabs or Ennard.

Actually, if you look closely, the nose splits off between two face plates, and you probably wouldn't see the nose when the springlock face opens anyway, so THAT idea falls flat.

Nope. You even disproved yourself. The slit down Baby's nose is tight compared to the rest of the face, so you would be able to see it. The faceplates on the suit are fairly far apart. And Baby's nose is pointed upwards, so you would 100% be able to see it when they opened up. I mean, they barely even open and you can't see any nose.

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

Does anyone like these books or have read them? I would like to discuss with you privatly. Sorry this isnt fnaf.

LINK TO BOOKS: http://haddixbooks.com/books/

I LOVE this book series! I have read all of the Shadow Children books.

MagicPigPerson wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

its funny how they banned all fnaf games…..

What are you talking about?
If you mean on scratch, I already knew that.
But if you mean the actual games…
*sniff*
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

On scratch, but i heard rumors about scott taking it off indiedb. Whens the movie? havent been in the fnaf communtie because i thaught it was stupid

The movie comes out in mid-2018, so it won't be a while until it's out yet.
I've never heard anything about scott taking FNAF off indiedb. Could you send me a link on it?

The official release date of the movie is yet to be confirmed, but Scott let slip it will be sometime in June 2018.

“The movie is out on youtube”

Well sort of snuck into his house

Scoot is the biggest troll

SCOTT not ‘Scoot’

flappy445 wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

its funny how they banned all fnaf games…..

What are you talking about?
If you mean on scratch, I already knew that.
But if you mean the actual games…
*sniff*
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

On scratch, but i heard rumors about scott taking it off indiedb. Whens the movie? havent been in the fnaf communtie because i thaught it was stupid

The movie comes out in mid-2018, so it won't be a while until it's out yet.
I've never heard anything about scott taking FNAF off indiedb. Could you send me a link on it?

The official release date of the movie is yet to be confirmed, but Scott let slip it will be sometime in June 2018.

“The movie is out on youtube”

Well sort of snuck into his house

Scoot is the biggest troll

SCOTT not ‘Scoot’

That's what I call good 'ol Scotty boy.

cs109801 wrote:

flappy445 wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

its funny how they banned all fnaf games…..

What are you talking about?
If you mean on scratch, I already knew that.
But if you mean the actual games…
*sniff*
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

On scratch, but i heard rumors about scott taking it off indiedb. Whens the movie? havent been in the fnaf communtie because i thaught it was stupid

The movie comes out in mid-2018, so it won't be a while until it's out yet.
I've never heard anything about scott taking FNAF off indiedb. Could you send me a link on it?

The official release date of the movie is yet to be confirmed, but Scott let slip it will be sometime in June 2018.

“The movie is out on youtube”

Well sort of snuck into his house

Scoot is the biggest troll

SCOTT not ‘Scoot’

That's what I call good 'ol Scotty boy.

Wait… for what? I'm so confused.

flappy445 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

flappy445 wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

its funny how they banned all fnaf games…..

What are you talking about?
If you mean on scratch, I already knew that.
But if you mean the actual games…
*sniff*
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

On scratch, but i heard rumors about scott taking it off indiedb. Whens the movie? havent been in the fnaf communtie because i thaught it was stupid

The movie comes out in mid-2018, so it won't be a while until it's out yet.
I've never heard anything about scott taking FNAF off indiedb. Could you send me a link on it?

The official release date of the movie is yet to be confirmed, but Scott let slip it will be sometime in June 2018.

“The movie is out on youtube”

Well sort of snuck into his house

Scoot is the biggest troll

SCOTT not ‘Scoot’

That's what I call good 'ol Scotty boy.

Wait… for what? I'm so confused.

That's just a fun name to call him.

cs109801 wrote:

flappy445 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

flappy445 wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

its funny how they banned all fnaf games…..

What are you talking about?
If you mean on scratch, I already knew that.
But if you mean the actual games…
*sniff*
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

On scratch, but i heard rumors about scott taking it off indiedb. Whens the movie? havent been in the fnaf communtie because i thaught it was stupid

The movie comes out in mid-2018, so it won't be a while until it's out yet.
I've never heard anything about scott taking FNAF off indiedb. Could you send me a link on it?

The official release date of the movie is yet to be confirmed, but Scott let slip it will be sometime in June 2018.

“The movie is out on youtube”

Well sort of snuck into his house

Scoot is the biggest troll

SCOTT not ‘Scoot’

That's what I call good 'ol Scotty boy.

Wait… for what? I'm so confused.

That's just a fun name to call him.

Is that what you call him? (I agree it is a fun name to call him )

flappy445 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

flappy445 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

flappy445 wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

its funny how they banned all fnaf games…..

What are you talking about?
If you mean on scratch, I already knew that.
But if you mean the actual games…
*sniff*
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

On scratch, but i heard rumors about scott taking it off indiedb. Whens the movie? havent been in the fnaf communtie because i thaught it was stupid

The movie comes out in mid-2018, so it won't be a while until it's out yet.
I've never heard anything about scott taking FNAF off indiedb. Could you send me a link on it?

The official release date of the movie is yet to be confirmed, but Scott let slip it will be sometime in June 2018.

“The movie is out on youtube”

Well sort of snuck into his house

Scoot is the biggest troll

SCOTT not ‘Scoot’

That's what I call good 'ol Scotty boy.

Wait… for what? I'm so confused.

That's just a fun name to call him.

Is that what you call him? (I agree it is a fun name to call him )

Yup.

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Ugh. Funtime Freddy has faceplates. Does normal Freddy do? No. Does that make Funtime Freddy not Freddy because he has faceplates? No. It's the same exact thing with Toy Chica. Also, the building is FFP after FNAF 1. And, to mention it again, what other relevance could CPW be to the plot if the springlock suit isn't a Chica suit? Please read what I am saying.

I'd like to set things straight here.
First, I AM NOT DISAGREEING TO YOUR TYPE OF LOGIC. I NEVER SAID THAT. It's perfectly fine for there to be multiple Freddys with different actions. I've also been saying, for multiple times, that TOY CHICA DOES NOT HAVE FACEPLATES. I know there is only one Toy Chica. Have you even been paying attention?
Second, by saying that the FNAF 3 in-between night minigames are located in FNAF 1, you are basically saying that FNAF 1 comes before FNAF 2.
Finally, how does this have anything to do with my springlock theory?

Clearly you disagree or don't understand what I'm saying. Just in case you misunderstood, I don't think it IS Toy Chica, but I just think it is a variant of Chica/Toy Chica. I was pointing out the characteristic of Toy Chica, not pointing out Toy Chica itself. Also, I see what you are getting at. Remember, there are two Aftons. The real question is are you even paying attention to any of what I'm saying? I specifically said this: "what other relevance could CPW be to the plot if the springlock suit isn't a Chica suit?" It is fairly obvious it has to do with my arguments against your theory.

What I believe the other relevance that CPW could be to the plot is that that could be the place where Circus Baby used to be before CBPW. Would you think there is a coincidence that CPW has the same letters in CBPW, just that there is a B for Circus BABY?
Secondly, if you inspect this picture, this picture, this picture, and this picture, you will see Chica's Party World in the source code. And since these pictures have to do with Circus Baby, it means that Circus Baby was once in CPW.

What would be the point of naming it "Chica's Party World". And, the CPW source code wasn't until Ennard or the Bidybabs. Plus, the Bidybabs are barely connected to Baby. I mean, they are there with Baby just for the sake of being with Baby. Also, the CPW and CBPW name connection means nothing. It's just that pizza and party both begin with a p and Circus and Chica both begin with a c. It doesn't mean anything.

It was probably because the sole purpose for Chica's Party World was for Chica, NOT Circus Baby. Also, the Bidybab teaser has Circus Baby in the background as well if you brighten the image, so your Bidybab idea might not be correct.

Just to point it out, the suit has no nose (1, 2, 3). Still, practically every SL teaser was somewhat connected to Baby so your theory falls flat. Like I said, it happened around the Bidybabs or Ennard.

Actually, if you look closely, the nose splits off between two face plates, and you probably wouldn't see the nose when the springlock face opens anyway, so THAT idea falls flat.

Nope. You even disproved yourself. The slit down Baby's nose is tight compared to the rest of the face, so you would be able to see it. The faceplates on the suit are fairly far apart. And Baby's nose is pointed upwards, so you would 100% be able to see it when they opened up. I mean, they barely even open and you can't see any nose.

Honestly, you have no idea what I'm talking about. Because we really have no evidence for there being a SPRINGLOCK suit in Chica's Party World. If there was, then why would it be moved to Circus Baby's Entertainment and Rental?
Also, there can't really be another animatronic who CAN be the springlock suit (as I've already explained). Do you agree on THAT at least?
EDIT: Sorry if I didn't answer you

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Yes I do. I read the English language, so this isn't hard to understand at all. Also, earlier you claimed it was a Baby springlock suit at Chica's Party World. Consistency please, or just at least establish what you stick with and what you abandon. On the contrary, there is no evidence against there being a springlock suit at the location so you can't really use that as evidence.

For petes sake, have you been listening at ALL. Chica is the most likely candidate because of all of what I said earlier. You obviously cannot counter it, so you accept my evidence. Either counter me with good evidence or don't act like you've won the debate at all.

Foxyuk wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

keppoch6 wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

its funny how they banned all fnaf games…..

What are you talking about?
If you mean on scratch, I already knew that.
But if you mean the actual games…
*sniff*
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

On scratch, but i heard rumors about scott taking it off indiedb. Whens the movie? havent been in the fnaf communtie because i thaught it was stupid

The movie comes out in mid-2018, so it won't be a while until it's out yet.
I've never heard anything about scott taking FNAF off indiedb. Could you send me a link on it?

The official release date of the movie is yet to be confirmed, but Scott let slip it will be sometime in June 2018.

“The movie is out on youtube”

If so i'll cheeck to see and if it is i will watch it
#no spoilers

He's most likely talking about a fan-made movie. There are so many of those on youtube, but none of them is the real one.
EDIT: Are you seriously going to listen to him? (no offense, foxyuk)

I'm Scott's son

MagicPigPerson wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

You know what I think we should do? I think that the best theorists that still go on this discussion page should have a meeting together in person, talk about their FNAF theories, and then try to come up with ways to summarize the list and show it to other people (Like maybe GT). Ithink it sounds like a great idea. I f you do too, reply to this with 3 smile-with-tongue faces and a list of who should and/or should not go. Remember, this would only be your opinions for lists. No one should offend another. I'm not trying to do that. I'm trying to come up with a way to put these theories to rest, and talk about some other ones, huh? What do you think?

YAAAAAAAAAAAAS

jji10 wrote:

puppygirlroxatart02 wrote:

Ohailo everybody, it's me PPG. I have a couple theories about FNAF and FNAF 2 that I'm wondering if anyone else has thought about and come to the same conclusion as me.

First: Who was the victim of the Bite of ‘87????

Since it is not mentioned in the second game at all, the first conclusion that you must come to is that the Bite of ’87 has not happened yet. The check that you receive is dated 11-13-1987, meaning that since the Bite has not happened yet, it must have happened some time within the next two months. Along with the check, you receive a notice saying that Freddy Fazbear's Pizza Place is closing. It can't have happened while the restaurant was closed, now could it? That means that it would've had to happen at the end of the week that you were there. On Night Four of the second game, Phone Guy mentions that the animatronic's facial recognition systems aren't working right, and they are acting more hostile towards employees. On Night Six, you are asked to do one more job, a birthday party, staying near the animatronics so that they don't hurt anybody. After that is when the restaurant closes. Coincidence? I THINK NOT!!!!!!!! When you put all of the clues together, you are able to figure out that you, Jeremy Fitzgerald, the character/night guard that you play in FNAF 2, is the victim of the Bite of '87.

I think that the Bite of ‘87 was just not mentioned because it was recent and he didn’t want you to quit. Which is why he does mention it in FNAF 1 because it's like years later so you probably wouldn't be scared by it.

cs109801 wrote:

*snip*

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Yes I do. I read the English language, so this isn't hard to understand at all. Also, earlier you claimed it was a Baby springlock suit at Chica's Party World. Consistency please, or just at least establish what you stick with and what you abandon. On the contrary, there is no evidence against there being a springlock suit at the location so you can't really use that as evidence.

For petes sake, have you been listening at ALL. Chica is the most likely candidate because of all of what I said earlier. You obviously cannot counter it, so you accept my evidence. Either counter me with good evidence or don't act like you've won the debate at all.

…alright. I'll give you some substantial evidence. It might disprove me, though, but it will most likely disprove you. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
On night 4 of FNAF 3, the Phone Guy mentions not to go into any suits. Why? Because he briefly explains a tragedy that happened at a SISTER LOCATION and many SPRINGLOCK FAILURES. Another thing that is worth mentioning, the phone calls in FNAF 3 are CASSETTE TAPES that are used for TRAINING. That means the calls were taken before this game (except the night 1 phone call). That can only mean this: why would the cassette guy (I'll call him that for this purpose) talk to you about a Sister Location if the springlock suit was a version of Chica from CPW?
Also, when Circus Baby says that you are in something that came from her old pizzeria, you have given me little to no evidence that Chica's Party World is before Circus Baby's Pizza World in the timeline. Please, give any evidence to prove that right.
Edit: And second, I can't listen to you since you didn't say anything to me.

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

*snip*

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Yes I do. I read the English language, so this isn't hard to understand at all. Also, earlier you claimed it was a Baby springlock suit at Chica's Party World. Consistency please, or just at least establish what you stick with and what you abandon. On the contrary, there is no evidence against there being a springlock suit at the location so you can't really use that as evidence.

For petes sake, have you been listening at ALL. Chica is the most likely candidate because of all of what I said earlier. You obviously cannot counter it, so you accept my evidence. Either counter me with good evidence or don't act like you've won the debate at all.

…alright. I'll give you some substantial evidence. It might disprove me, though, but it will most likely disprove you. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
On night 4 of FNAF 3, the Phone Guy mentions not to go into any suits. Why? Because he briefly explains a tragedy that happened at a SISTER LOCATION and many SPRINGLOCK FAILURES. Another thing that is worth mentioning, the phone calls in FNAF 3 are CASSETTE TAPES that are used for TRAINING. That means the calls were taken before this game (except the night 1 phone call). That can only mean this: why would the cassette guy (I'll call him that for this purpose) talk to you about a Sister Location if the springlock suit was a version of Chica from CPW?
Also, when Circus Baby says that you are in something that came from her old pizzeria, you have given me little to no evidence that Chica's Party World is before Circus Baby's Pizza World in the timeline. Please, give any evidence to prove that right.
Edit: And second, I can't listen to you since you didn't say anything to me.

The probability was wrong. I think all I need to say is the title of the very first SL teaser: “Five Nights At Freddy's: Sister Location”, and “There was never just one.” As in there was never just one sister location. Also the tapes VERY CLEARLY describe the type of location seen in Stage 01 and FNAF 4. The likeliness that the suit is a Chica suit more than provides the evidence. It's the only related location we know that has Chica in it. I already established that. Also, stop saying that if there is no evidence for it being after aswell. That is not how the argument works.

This just proves to me you do not understand this at all. “the nose splits off between two face plates” I responded with “The slit down Baby's nose is tight compared to the rest of the face”. “you probably wouldn't see the nose when the springlock face opens anyway” I responded with “Baby's nose is pointed upwards, so you would 100% be able to see it when they opened up”. I've been responding to every argument you make, so don't act like I've never responded to you. This just goes to show you don't care one bit about what you are talking about.

cs109801 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

Does anyone like these books or have read them? I would like to discuss with you privatly. Sorry this isnt fnaf.

LINK TO BOOKS: http://haddixbooks.com/books/

I LOVE this book series! I have read all of the Shadow Children books.

Plus some of The Missing series.

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Ugh. Funtime Freddy has faceplates. Does normal Freddy do? No. Does that make Funtime Freddy not Freddy because he has faceplates? No. It's the same exact thing with Toy Chica. Also, the building is FFP after FNAF 1. And, to mention it again, what other relevance could CPW be to the plot if the springlock suit isn't a Chica suit? Please read what I am saying.

I'd like to set things straight here.
First, I AM NOT DISAGREEING TO YOUR TYPE OF LOGIC. I NEVER SAID THAT. It's perfectly fine for there to be multiple Freddys with different actions. I've also been saying, for multiple times, that TOY CHICA DOES NOT HAVE FACEPLATES. I know there is only one Toy Chica. Have you even been paying attention?
Second, by saying that the FNAF 3 in-between night minigames are located in FNAF 1, you are basically saying that FNAF 1 comes before FNAF 2.
Finally, how does this have anything to do with my springlock theory?

Clearly you disagree or don't understand what I'm saying. Just in case you misunderstood, I don't think it IS Toy Chica, but I just think it is a variant of Chica/Toy Chica. I was pointing out the characteristic of Toy Chica, not pointing out Toy Chica itself. Also, I see what you are getting at. Remember, there are two Aftons. The real question is are you even paying attention to any of what I'm saying? I specifically said this: "what other relevance could CPW be to the plot if the springlock suit isn't a Chica suit?" It is fairly obvious it has to do with my arguments against your theory.

What I believe the other relevance that CPW could be to the plot is that that could be the place where Circus Baby used to be before CBPW. Would you think there is a coincidence that CPW has the same letters in CBPW, just that there is a B for Circus BABY?
Secondly, if you inspect this picture, this picture, this picture, and this picture, you will see Chica's Party World in the source code. And since these pictures have to do with Circus Baby, it means that Circus Baby was once in CPW.

What would be the point of naming it "Chica's Party World". And, the CPW source code wasn't until Ennard or the Bidybabs. Plus, the Bidybabs are barely connected to Baby. I mean, they are there with Baby just for the sake of being with Baby. Also, the CPW and CBPW name connection means nothing. It's just that pizza and party both begin with a p and Circus and Chica both begin with a c. It doesn't mean anything.

It was probably because the sole purpose for Chica's Party World was for Chica, NOT Circus Baby. Also, the Bidybab teaser has Circus Baby in the background as well if you brighten the image, so your Bidybab idea might not be correct.

Just to point it out, the suit has no nose (1, 2, 3). Still, practically every SL teaser was somewhat connected to Baby so your theory falls flat. Like I said, it happened around the Bidybabs or Ennard.

Actually, if you look closely, the nose splits off between two face plates, and you probably wouldn't see the nose when the springlock face opens anyway, so THAT idea falls flat.

Nope. You even disproved yourself. The slit down Baby's nose is tight compared to the rest of the face, so you would be able to see it. The faceplates on the suit are fairly far apart. And Baby's nose is pointed upwards, so you would 100% be able to see it when they opened up. I mean, they barely even open and you can't see any nose.

Honestly, you have no idea what I'm talking about. Because we really have no evidence for there being a SPRINGLOCK suit in Chica's Party World. If there was, then why would it be moved to Circus Baby's Entertainment and Rental?
Also, there can't really be another animatronic who CAN be the springlock suit (as I've already explained). Do you agree on THAT at least?
EDIT: Sorry if I didn't answer you

Yes I do. I read the English language, so this isn't hard to understand at all. Also, earlier you claimed it was a Baby springlock suit at Chica's Party World. Consistency please, or just at least establish what you stick with and what you abandon. On the contrary, there is no evidence against there being a springlock suit at the location so you can't really use that as evidence.

For petes sake, have you been listening at ALL. Chica is the most likely candidate because of all of what I said earlier. You obviously cannot counter it, so you accept my evidence. Either counter me with good evidence or don't act like you've won the debate at all.

cs109801 wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

keppoch6 wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

its funny how they banned all fnaf games…..

What are you talking about?
If you mean on scratch, I already knew that.
But if you mean the actual games…
*sniff*
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

On scratch, but i heard rumors about scott taking it off indiedb. Whens the movie? havent been in the fnaf communtie because i thaught it was stupid

The movie comes out in mid-2018, so it won't be a while until it's out yet.
I've never heard anything about scott taking FNAF off indiedb. Could you send me a link on it?

The official release date of the movie is yet to be confirmed, but Scott let slip it will be sometime in June 2018.

“The movie is out on youtube”

If so i'll cheeck to see and if it is i will watch it
#no spoilers

He's most likely talking about a fan-made movie. There are so many of those on youtube, but none of them is the real one.
EDIT: Are you seriously going to listen to him? (no offense, foxyuk)

I'm Scott's son

What's your proof? Tell me who the springlock suit is, then.

cs109801 wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

keppoch6 wrote:

Foxyuk wrote:

MagicPigPerson wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

cs109801 wrote:

Why_Are_You_Reading wrote:

its funny how they banned all fnaf games…..

What are you talking about?
If you mean on scratch, I already knew that.
But if you mean the actual games…
*sniff*
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

On scratch, but i heard rumors about scott taking it off indiedb. Whens the movie? havent been in the fnaf communtie because i thaught it was stupid

The movie comes out in mid-2018, so it won't be a while until it's out yet.
I've never heard anything about scott taking FNAF off indiedb. Could you send me a link on it?

The official release date of the movie is yet to be confirmed, but Scott let slip it will be sometime in June 2018.

“The movie is out on youtube”

If so i'll cheeck to see and if it is i will watch it
#no spoilers

He's most likely talking about a fan-made movie. There are so many of those on youtube, but none of them is the real one.
EDIT: Are you seriously going to listen to him? (no offense, foxyuk)

I'm Scott's son

What's your proof? Tell me who the springlock suit is, then.