Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Advanced Topics
- » Scratch 3.0
- liam48D
-
1000+ posts
Scratch 3.0
Wait what how is that sadIt's a sad day, my friends I'm pretty sure they're switching to 2.0-style variable reporters, but they're considering adding a “myself” option to the “_ of _” block
- Jonathan50
-
1000+ posts
Scratch 3.0
Because 2.0-style variables are inconsistentWait what how is that sad It's a sad day, my friends
Last edited by Jonathan50 (Nov. 7, 2016 01:06:52)
- -stache-
-
500+ posts
Scratch 3.0
how so?Because 2.0-style variables are inconsistentWait what how is that sad It's a sad day, my friends
- Jonathan50
-
1000+ posts
Scratch 3.0
Well, until Scratch 1.3, each variable had its own set of getter, setter and incrementer blocks. So if you made how so?three two variables, foo and bar, there would be these blocks in the Variables category:
(foo)Then Scratch 1.3 changed it so there is either no setter/incrementer blocks or only one, and you selected the variable you want to change the value of using a dropdown. So there would now be these blocks:
set foo to [0] :: variables
change foo by (1) :: variables
(bar)
set bar to [0] :: variables
change bar by (1) :: variables
(foo)But why not do the same with the getter blocks?
(bar)
set [foo v] to [0]
change [foo v] by (1)
Last edited by Jonathan50 (Nov. 7, 2016 02:14:21)
- Jonathan50
-
1000+ posts
Scratch 3.0
I originally had foo, bar and baz and then decided to remove baz – but I didn't change the three.three variablesfoo and bar

- NickyNouse
-
1000+ posts
Scratch 3.0
All y'all were too worried about the US election to focus on the important things in life, like Scratch 3.0https://github.com/llk/scratch-guiFinaly

- IcyCoder
-
1000+ posts
Scratch 3.0
trueAll y'all were too worried about the US election to focus on the important things in life, like Scratch 3.0https://github.com/llk/scratch-guiFinaly
- PullJosh
-
1000+ posts
Scratch 3.0
You're the first person I've met to use this phrase (besides myself). All y'all

- NickyNouse
-
1000+ posts
Scratch 3.0
I don't think I've ever said it out loud, thoughYou're the first person I've met to use this phrase (besides myself). All y'all

- chooper100
-
500+ posts
Scratch 3.0
I thought I would be able to escape from all the election posts on Scratch. I was wrong


- MegaApuTurkUltra
-
1000+ posts
Scratch 3.0
ಠ_ಠ Finaly
The only time I ever use y'all is when translating the 2nd person plural of Latin verbsI don't think I've ever said it out loud, thoughYou're the first person I've met to use this phrase (besides myself). All y'all

(since regular English doesn't have a distinct 2nd plural)
- chooper100
-
500+ posts
Scratch 3.0
So portatis = y'all carry The only time I ever use y'all is when translating the 2nd person plural of Latin verbs
(since regular English doesn't have a distinct 2nd plural)

If I wanted to be clear I just used “you lot”

- Jonathan50
-
1000+ posts
Scratch 3.0
Apparently that includes the Scratch Team: All y'all were too worried about the US election to focus on the important things in life, like Scratch 3.0
GraphicaL
- BookOwl
-
1000+ posts
Scratch 3.0
Y'all should use “y'all” more often.The only time I ever use y'all is when translating the 2nd person plural of Latin verbsI don't think I've ever said it out loud, thoughYou're the first person I've met to use this phrase (besides myself). All y'all
(since regular English doesn't have a distinct 2nd plural)

- PullJosh
-
1000+ posts
Scratch 3.0
Fixed that for all y'all. I thought I would be able to escape from all the election posts on Scratch. I wasWRONG

In other news, it appears that the ST has started work on the Scratch 3.0 website backend.

- chooper100
-
500+ posts
Scratch 3.0
What does scratch-auth actually do atm? The description doesn't convey much info to me
- MegaApuTurkUltra
-
1000+ posts
Scratch 3.0
^ yes I was confused as well What does scratch-auth actually do atm? The description doesn't convey much info to me
thisandagain pls explain
Last edited by MegaApuTurkUltra (Nov. 10, 2016 01:25:52)