Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nextor wrote:

Sister Location is out, and with it a NEW THEORY!!!!
In this quote, we will be going over SPOILERS. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
Anyway, now that that's out of the way…
By typing in the numbers 1-9-8-3 into the keypad in the room marked PRIVATE, the screens light up to show some of the rooms from FNAF4. Therefore, Will Afton and the Crying Child are somehow related- maybe even as father and son. Also, in the Give Cupcakes mini game, upon completion we see a PIGTAIL GIRL walk up to Baby- and get SCOOPED. #biteof83? In the Night 5 audio, we hear a little girl's voice say, “You made her just for me!… where did all the other children go?” In these snippets of audio, we hear Pigtail Girl from FNAF4 say that “Daddy made her just for me!” Therefore, Crying Child is brother to Pigtail girl who is daughter of William Afton. DUN DUN DUUUUH! And if you didn't think that's enough, well. Remember the menu ambiance for FNAF1? The SAME NOISE is used for the static on the TV after the Vlad-And-Clara shorts!
Also, the bad ending, we see what appears to be William Afton walk up to a mirror, and open his eyes- PURPLE eyes. Does this mean that the Purple Man (Afton) Never Wanted To Be The Purple Man?

Two things I want to point out.
First, I feel like everyone forgets this:
http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/freddy-fazbears-pizza/images/7/71/Purple_man.png/revision/latest?cb=20150723044740

The purple guy always had white, or “silver” eyes.

And, I hope you realize that the FNAF 4 bedroom on the monitors shows that FNAF 4 was real, and not nightmares.

I'm not saying FNAF4 location isn't a nightmare. I still believe in the dream theory. And while your first point is technically correct, I think the monitors signify that whoever is the mastermind of Sister Location has SEEN the FNAF4 bedroom. That's all.

xX_Mrs_Pink_xX wrote:

PrincessLuna789 wrote:

TonikDeluxe wrote:

Okay guys here is my theory i think that the puppet in steve from minecraft think about it steve makes blocks and the puppet is in a music box but that is also a block!!!!

… You're kidding right…?

ikr? that's related to fnaf and minecraft

if the creator of minecraft and FNaF were the same person (which their not, they are Scott and Markus) it might be a tiny bit possible… but i don't think so

Nextor wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nextor wrote:

Sister Location is out, and with it a NEW THEORY!!!!
In this quote, we will be going over SPOILERS. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
Anyway, now that that's out of the way…
By typing in the numbers 1-9-8-3 into the keypad in the room marked PRIVATE, the screens light up to show some of the rooms from FNAF4. Therefore, Will Afton and the Crying Child are somehow related- maybe even as father and son. Also, in the Give Cupcakes mini game, upon completion we see a PIGTAIL GIRL walk up to Baby- and get SCOOPED. #biteof83? In the Night 5 audio, we hear a little girl's voice say, “You made her just for me!… where did all the other children go?” In these snippets of audio, we hear Pigtail Girl from FNAF4 say that “Daddy made her just for me!” Therefore, Crying Child is brother to Pigtail girl who is daughter of William Afton. DUN DUN DUUUUH! And if you didn't think that's enough, well. Remember the menu ambiance for FNAF1? The SAME NOISE is used for the static on the TV after the Vlad-And-Clara shorts!
Also, the bad ending, we see what appears to be William Afton walk up to a mirror, and open his eyes- PURPLE eyes. Does this mean that the Purple Man (Afton) Never Wanted To Be The Purple Man?

Two things I want to point out.
First, I feel like everyone forgets this:
http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/freddy-fazbears-pizza/images/7/71/Purple_man.png/revision/latest?cb=20150723044740

The purple guy always had white, or “silver” eyes.

And, I hope you realize that the FNAF 4 bedroom on the monitors shows that FNAF 4 was real, and not nightmares.

I'm not saying FNAF4 location isn't a nightmare. I still believe in the dream theory. And while your first point is technically correct, I think the monitors signify that whoever is the mastermind of Sister Location has SEEN the FNAF4 bedroom. That's all.

I don't want to debate or anything, but I want to throw my own ideas into the ring.

Now, about the FNAF 4 rooms. We know they exist aside from the monitor screens, as they are seen in the breaker room:


Now, these are labeled as “observatories”. Why? Why would Afton need these rooms, at all? Perhaps, these rooms held a malicious intent. Like, torture?

Think about it. If Afton could make these high tech wire animatronics that are so detailed, he could surely make the nightmares. Each room has a purpose. The bedroom is for the illusion of a nightmare and fear of the unknown. The Plushtrap room simulates a seemingly teleporting doll with 5
Plushtraps seen on the map represented by dots. Finally, the mini game map. This observatory simulates a real world environment where the kid is being tormented by his “brother”, and is guided by his imaginary Fredbear plush.

Now, the mini game map may be a normal setting but monitored, or entirely staged. Either way, It is clear that the “bite of 8X” is staged by Afton.

Sorry if this was hard to understand, just my two cents.

Nextor wrote:

Sister Location is out, and with it a NEW THEORY!!!!
In this quote, we will be going over SPOILERS. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
Anyway, now that that's out of the way…
By typing in the numbers 1-9-8-3 into the keypad in the room marked PRIVATE, the screens light up to show some of the rooms from FNAF4. Therefore, Will Afton and the Crying Child are somehow related- maybe even as father and son. Also, in the Give Cupcakes mini game, upon completion we see a PIGTAIL GIRL walk up to Baby- and get SCOOPED. #biteof83? In the Night 5 audio, we hear a little girl's voice say, “You made her just for me!… where did all the other children go?” In these snippets of audio, we hear Pigtail Girl from FNAF4 say that “Daddy made her just for me!” Therefore, Crying Child is brother to Pigtail girl who is daughter of William Afton. DUN DUN DUUUUH! And if you didn't think that's enough, well. Remember the menu ambiance for FNAF1? The SAME NOISE is used for the static on the TV after the Vlad-And-Clara shorts!
Also, the bad ending, we see what appears to be William Afton walk up to a mirror, and open his eyes- PURPLE eyes. Does this mean that the Purple Man (Afton) Never Wanted To Be The Purple Man?

His eyes are purple because Ennard stuffed himself inside of him. (Ennard became his innards XD)

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nextor wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nextor wrote:

Sister Location is out, and with it a NEW THEORY!!!!
In this quote, we will be going over SPOILERS. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
Anyway, now that that's out of the way…
By typing in the numbers 1-9-8-3 into the keypad in the room marked PRIVATE, the screens light up to show some of the rooms from FNAF4. Therefore, Will Afton and the Crying Child are somehow related- maybe even as father and son. Also, in the Give Cupcakes mini game, upon completion we see a PIGTAIL GIRL walk up to Baby- and get SCOOPED. #biteof83? In the Night 5 audio, we hear a little girl's voice say, “You made her just for me!… where did all the other children go?” In these snippets of audio, we hear Pigtail Girl from FNAF4 say that “Daddy made her just for me!” Therefore, Crying Child is brother to Pigtail girl who is daughter of William Afton. DUN DUN DUUUUH! And if you didn't think that's enough, well. Remember the menu ambiance for FNAF1? The SAME NOISE is used for the static on the TV after the Vlad-And-Clara shorts!
Also, the bad ending, we see what appears to be William Afton walk up to a mirror, and open his eyes- PURPLE eyes. Does this mean that the Purple Man (Afton) Never Wanted To Be The Purple Man?

Two things I want to point out.
First, I feel like everyone forgets this:
http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/freddy-fazbears-pizza/images/7/71/Purple_man.png/revision/latest?cb=20150723044740

The purple guy always had white, or “silver” eyes.

And, I hope you realize that the FNAF 4 bedroom on the monitors shows that FNAF 4 was real, and not nightmares.

I'm not saying FNAF4 location isn't a nightmare. I still believe in the dream theory. And while your first point is technically correct, I think the monitors signify that whoever is the mastermind of Sister Location has SEEN the FNAF4 bedroom. That's all.

I don't want to debate or anything, but I want to throw my own ideas into the ring.

Now, about the FNAF 4 rooms. We know they exist aside from the monitor screens, as they are seen in the breaker room:


Now, these are labeled as “observatories”. Why? Why would Afton need these rooms, at all? Perhaps, these rooms held a malicious intent. Like, torture?

Think about it. If Afton could make these high tech wire animatronics that are so detailed, he could surely make the nightmares. Each room has a purpose. The bedroom is for the illusion of a nightmare and fear of the unknown. The Plushtrap room simulates a seemingly teleporting doll with 5
Plushtraps seen on the map represented by dots. Finally, the mini game map. This observatory simulates a real world environment where the kid is being tormented by his “brother”, and is guided by his imaginary Fredbear plush.

Now, the mini game map may be a normal setting but monitored, or entirely staged. Either way, It is clear that the “bite of 8X” is staged by Afton.

Sorry if this was hard to understand, just my two cents.

Whaaaaaaaaaat?

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nextor wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

Nextor wrote:

Sister Location is out, and with it a NEW THEORY!!!!
In this quote, we will be going over SPOILERS. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.
Anyway, now that that's out of the way…
By typing in the numbers 1-9-8-3 into the keypad in the room marked PRIVATE, the screens light up to show some of the rooms from FNAF4. Therefore, Will Afton and the Crying Child are somehow related- maybe even as father and son. Also, in the Give Cupcakes mini game, upon completion we see a PIGTAIL GIRL walk up to Baby- and get SCOOPED. #biteof83? In the Night 5 audio, we hear a little girl's voice say, “You made her just for me!… where did all the other children go?” In these snippets of audio, we hear Pigtail Girl from FNAF4 say that “Daddy made her just for me!” Therefore, Crying Child is brother to Pigtail girl who is daughter of William Afton. DUN DUN DUUUUH! And if you didn't think that's enough, well. Remember the menu ambiance for FNAF1? The SAME NOISE is used for the static on the TV after the Vlad-And-Clara shorts!
Also, the bad ending, we see what appears to be William Afton walk up to a mirror, and open his eyes- PURPLE eyes. Does this mean that the Purple Man (Afton) Never Wanted To Be The Purple Man?

Two things I want to point out.
First, I feel like everyone forgets this:
http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/freddy-fazbears-pizza/images/7/71/Purple_man.png/revision/latest?cb=20150723044740

The purple guy always had white, or “silver” eyes.

And, I hope you realize that the FNAF 4 bedroom on the monitors shows that FNAF 4 was real, and not nightmares.

I'm not saying FNAF4 location isn't a nightmare. I still believe in the dream theory. And while your first point is technically correct, I think the monitors signify that whoever is the mastermind of Sister Location has SEEN the FNAF4 bedroom. That's all.

I don't want to debate or anything, but I want to throw my own ideas into the ring.

Now, about the FNAF 4 rooms. We know they exist aside from the monitor screens, as they are seen in the breaker room:


Now, these are labeled as “observatories”. Why? Why would Afton need these rooms, at all? Perhaps, these rooms held a malicious intent. Like, torture?

Think about it. If Afton could make these high tech wire animatronics that are so detailed, he could surely make the nightmares. Each room has a purpose. The bedroom is for the illusion of a nightmare and fear of the unknown. The Plushtrap room simulates a seemingly teleporting doll with 5
Plushtraps seen on the map represented by dots. Finally, the mini game map. This observatory simulates a real world environment where the kid is being tormented by his “brother”, and is guided by his imaginary Fredbear plush.

Now, the mini game map may be a normal setting but monitored, or entirely staged. Either way, It is clear that the “bite of 8X” is staged by Afton.

Sorry if this was hard to understand, just my two cents.

I will be first to admit that this is a mindblower, and MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, there is a shadow of a belief that I may be wrong. And technically, this makes sense in the Fnaf4 lore. But why does the number 1983 have to be entered into the keypad for the camera screens to appear? Besides, why would the crying child's bedroom be IN SISTER LOCATION in the first place? Is this only proving the original statement in this quote chain?
“Think about it”. How would William Afton get a PERSON in the facility to play FNAF4? Unless Afton has some kind of power over the crying child, i.e. as a father has power over a son? It could also mean that the FNAF location we see in the FNAF4 mini games is actually SISTER LOCATION?!?
Anyway, on a completely unrelated note, I think someone decoded the gibberish from the Sister Location AI audio on the Third Night. Confirm?

sonictheanimator wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

MiniFluffyBug wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

freddycheesenugget wrote:

The bite was delivered by withered freddy

impossible, freddy was in parts and service at the time

how do you know?

the bite of 87 was happened in FNAF2

WRONG it happened in Fnaf 1 Either though Mangle Has the sharpest teeth Foxy Jaws
are hard enough to bite through the frontal lobe and give him bloody teeth

Well actually it happened in neither. The bite of 87' was caused by Fredbear aka Golden Freddy and took place in FredBear's Family diner. It was in a minigame in Fnaf 4 with you have made it through the 5th night likie I did. I witnessed it… I feel like my whole world was turned upside down for a minute at the end of the minigame.

CupcakeCheeseCracker wrote:

sonictheanimator wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

MiniFluffyBug wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

freddycheesenugget wrote:

The bite was delivered by withered freddy

impossible, freddy was in parts and service at the time

how do you know?

the bite of 87 was happened in FNAF2

WRONG it happened in Fnaf 1 Either though Mangle Has the sharpest teeth Foxy Jaws
are hard enough to bite through the frontal lobe and give him bloody teeth

Well actually it happened in neither. The bite of 87' was caused by Fredbear aka Golden Freddy and took place in FredBear's Family diner. It was in a minigame in Fnaf 4 with you have made it through the 5th night likie I did. I witnessed it… I feel like my whole world was turned upside down for a minute at the end of the minigame.

*Buzzer sound* WRONG! That wasn't he bite of ‘87. Cause the bite of ’87 resulted in the loss of the victim's frontal lobe. However, in the fnaf 4 minigame, his frontal lobe wasn't removed, but his head was crushed. And for those of you who say that he had his frontal lobe removed after it was damaged, think again. In fnaf 4, the game consists of nightmares. However, people who have their frontal lobe removed CAN'T have nightmares. Also, if he had his frontal lobe removed, he wouldn't exhibit the behavior he does in the gameplay. If someone's frontal lobe is removed, and they think there is something scary in a hall or something, they would check the hall ONCE. They wouldn't check it again because the area of thinking that would make them think they had to check the hall again is in the FRONTAL LOBE. Also, fnaf 4 takes place before fnaf 2, because in fnaf 2 they said that Fredbear's Family Diner had been closed down for years. So fnaf 4 couldn't have taken place in 1987 because fnaf 2, which takes place AT LEAST 2 years after fnaf 4, did. And last but not least, in fnaf 1, the phone guy says that “It's amazing how someone could live without the frontal lobe,” meaning that the person is still alive, or died of a different cause. However, as we know, the character from fnaf 4 DIED in the hospital due to his injuries, and if his injuries were so bad that they killed him, there is no way he could've survived until 1993. So there, it wasn't Fredbear.

As a matter of fact, it was probably Mangle. I know this because it had to be one of the Toy animatronics, and Mangle is the most likely due to her sharp teeth. The reason it has to be a Toy is because at the end of fnaf 2 (Which happens to take place in 1987) it is written in a newspaper that the Toys would be retired and that they would fix up the old animatronics to put to work if they ever reopened. So HAH! I win! But if you have proof that I'm wrong, go ahead and tell me, so I can prove you wrong too! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

BTW if anyone remembers me from when this forum topic was still young, I'M BAAAAAACK!

fireaction2001 wrote:

CupcakeCheeseCracker wrote:

sonictheanimator wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

MiniFluffyBug wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

freddycheesenugget wrote:

The bite was delivered by withered freddy

impossible, freddy was in parts and service at the time

how do you know?

the bite of 87 was happened in FNAF2

WRONG it happened in Fnaf 1 Either though Mangle Has the sharpest teeth Foxy Jaws
are hard enough to bite through the frontal lobe and give him bloody teeth

Well actually it happened in neither. The bite of 87' was caused by Fredbear aka Golden Freddy and took place in FredBear's Family diner. It was in a minigame in Fnaf 4 with you have made it through the 5th night likie I did. I witnessed it… I feel like my whole world was turned upside down for a minute at the end of the minigame.

*Buzzer sound* WRONG! That wasn't he bite of ‘87. Cause the bite of ’87 resulted in the loss of the victim's frontal lobe. However, in the fnaf 4 minigame, his frontal lobe wasn't removed, but his head was crushed. And for those of you who say that he had his frontal lobe removed after it was damaged, think again. In fnaf 4, the game consists of nightmares. However, people who have their frontal lobe removed CAN'T have nightmares. Also, if he had his frontal lobe removed, he wouldn't exhibit the behavior he does in the gameplay. If someone's frontal lobe is removed, and they think there is something scary in a hall or something, they would check the hall ONCE. They wouldn't check it again because the area of thinking that would make them think they had to check the hall again is in the FRONTAL LOBE. Also, fnaf 4 takes place before fnaf 2, because in fnaf 2 they said that Fredbear's Family Diner had been closed down for years. So fnaf 4 couldn't have taken place in 1987 because fnaf 2, which takes place AT LEAST 2 years after fnaf 4, did. And last but not least, in fnaf 1, the phone guy says that “It's amazing how someone could live without the frontal lobe,” meaning that the person is still alive, or died of a different cause. However, as we know, the character from fnaf 4 DIED in the hospital due to his injuries, and if his injuries were so bad that they killed him, there is no way he could've survived until 1993. So there, it wasn't Fredbear.

As a matter of fact, it was probably Mangle. I know this because it had to be one of the Toy animatronics, and Mangle is the most likely due to her sharp teeth. The reason it has to be a Toy is because at the end of fnaf 2 (Which happens to take place in 1987) it is written in a newspaper that the Toys would be retired and that they would fix up the old animatronics to put to work if they ever reopened. So HAH! I win! But if you have proof that I'm wrong, go ahead and tell me, so I can prove you wrong too! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Actually, at the very least “…can live without a frontal lobe” means that the frontal lobe is at least not functional, and not taken out. So, you're wrong. But, to humor you, lets say that it maybe did mean that. The whole “Bite kid can't have nightmares” is not applicable to this situation.

Think about it. By saying that, we're basically thinking everything in FNAF is realistic. But it is not. I'll give you a couple examples.
In FNAF, there's clipping. Clipping as in 3d objects passing through other 3d objects, which is only possible in simulated 3d software.
Here's a couple pictures to name a few:
http://i.imgur.com/K6JXofr.png?1
http://i.imgur.com/ojrjjXB.png?1
http://i.imgur.com/2yrTEcN.png?1

So, we can't really say that FNAF is 100% realistic. And, we play in Freddy Fazbear's Pizza, not Fredbear's Family Diner.

And finally, the way you worded it is enough to disprove you. "no way he could've survived until 1993. You are correct. But, Phone Guy said he can live without the frontal lobe. These two words are slightly different. Live means to remain alive, while survive means to continue to remain alive. The bite child remained alive without his frontal lobe functioning, but he didn't continue to remain alive, and he eventually died. So, the bite child does fit the criteria of what phone guy said.

So yes, Fredbear did do the bite.

Ok so imma be serious here everyone knows at the end of the fnaf 4 game where the font changes to a lighter yellow then a yellow that golden freddy had? There was one person with the same font and that was the girl who told the urban legend about the robotics thing I believe and matpat does as well believe she is fnaf 4's kid sister which leads up to SISTER location

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

fireaction2001 wrote:

CupcakeCheeseCracker wrote:

sonictheanimator wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

MiniFluffyBug wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

freddycheesenugget wrote:

The bite was delivered by withered freddy

impossible, freddy was in parts and service at the time

how do you know?

the bite of 87 was happened in FNAF2

WRONG it happened in Fnaf 1 Either though Mangle Has the sharpest teeth Foxy Jaws
are hard enough to bite through the frontal lobe and give him bloody teeth

Well actually it happened in neither. The bite of 87' was caused by Fredbear aka Golden Freddy and took place in FredBear's Family diner. It was in a minigame in Fnaf 4 with you have made it through the 5th night likie I did. I witnessed it… I feel like my whole world was turned upside down for a minute at the end of the minigame.

*Buzzer sound* WRONG! That wasn't he bite of ‘87. Cause the bite of ’87 resulted in the loss of the victim's frontal lobe. However, in the fnaf 4 minigame, his frontal lobe wasn't removed, but his head was crushed. And for those of you who say that he had his frontal lobe removed after it was damaged, think again. In fnaf 4, the game consists of nightmares. However, people who have their frontal lobe removed CAN'T have nightmares. Also, if he had his frontal lobe removed, he wouldn't exhibit the behavior he does in the gameplay. If someone's frontal lobe is removed, and they think there is something scary in a hall or something, they would check the hall ONCE. They wouldn't check it again because the area of thinking that would make them think they had to check the hall again is in the FRONTAL LOBE. Also, fnaf 4 takes place before fnaf 2, because in fnaf 2 they said that Fredbear's Family Diner had been closed down for years. So fnaf 4 couldn't have taken place in 1987 because fnaf 2, which takes place AT LEAST 2 years after fnaf 4, did. And last but not least, in fnaf 1, the phone guy says that “It's amazing how someone could live without the frontal lobe,” meaning that the person is still alive, or died of a different cause. However, as we know, the character from fnaf 4 DIED in the hospital due to his injuries, and if his injuries were so bad that they killed him, there is no way he could've survived until 1993. So there, it wasn't Fredbear.

As a matter of fact, it was probably Mangle. I know this because it had to be one of the Toy animatronics, and Mangle is the most likely due to her sharp teeth. The reason it has to be a Toy is because at the end of fnaf 2 (Which happens to take place in 1987) it is written in a newspaper that the Toys would be retired and that they would fix up the old animatronics to put to work if they ever reopened. So HAH! I win! But if you have proof that I'm wrong, go ahead and tell me, so I can prove you wrong too! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Actually, at the very least “…can live without a frontal lobe” means that the frontal lobe is at least not functional, and not taken out. So, you're wrong. But, to humor you, lets say that it maybe did mean that. The whole “Bite kid can't have nightmares” is not applicable to this situation.

Think about it. By saying that, we're basically thinking everything in FNAF is realistic. But it is not. I'll give you a couple examples.
In FNAF, there's clipping. Clipping as in 3d objects passing through other 3d objects, which is only possible in simulated 3d software.
Here's a couple pictures to name a few:
http://i.imgur.com/K6JXofr.png?1
http://i.imgur.com/ojrjjXB.png?1
http://i.imgur.com/2yrTEcN.png?1

So, we can't really say that FNAF is 100% realistic. And, we play in Freddy Fazbear's Pizza, not Fredbear's Family Diner.

And finally, the way you worded it is enough to disprove you. "no way he could've survived until 1993. You are correct. But, Phone Guy said he can live without the frontal lobe. These two words are slightly different. Live means to remain alive, while survive means to continue to remain alive. The bite child remained alive without his frontal lobe functioning, but he didn't continue to remain alive, and he eventually died. So, the bite child does fit the criteria of what phone guy said.

So yes, Fredbear did do the bite.

LOL what about my other points I made? Like howthe bite of '87 happened in 1987? And how fnaf 4 took place before 1987 because in fnaf 2, which is CONFIRMED to take place in 1987, fredbears family diner had been closed for years…

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

fireaction2001 wrote:

CupcakeCheeseCracker wrote:

sonictheanimator wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

MiniFluffyBug wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

freddycheesenugget wrote:

The bite was delivered by withered freddy

impossible, freddy was in parts and service at the time

how do you know?

the bite of 87 was happened in FNAF2

WRONG it happened in Fnaf 1 Either though Mangle Has the sharpest teeth Foxy Jaws
are hard enough to bite through the frontal lobe and give him bloody teeth

Well actually it happened in neither. The bite of 87' was caused by Fredbear aka Golden Freddy and took place in FredBear's Family diner. It was in a minigame in Fnaf 4 with you have made it through the 5th night likie I did. I witnessed it… I feel like my whole world was turned upside down for a minute at the end of the minigame.

*Buzzer sound* WRONG! That wasn't he bite of ‘87. Cause the bite of ’87 resulted in the loss of the victim's frontal lobe. However, in the fnaf 4 minigame, his frontal lobe wasn't removed, but his head was crushed. And for those of you who say that he had his frontal lobe removed after it was damaged, think again. In fnaf 4, the game consists of nightmares. However, people who have their frontal lobe removed CAN'T have nightmares. Also, if he had his frontal lobe removed, he wouldn't exhibit the behavior he does in the gameplay. If someone's frontal lobe is removed, and they think there is something scary in a hall or something, they would check the hall ONCE. They wouldn't check it again because the area of thinking that would make them think they had to check the hall again is in the FRONTAL LOBE. Also, fnaf 4 takes place before fnaf 2, because in fnaf 2 they said that Fredbear's Family Diner had been closed down for years. So fnaf 4 couldn't have taken place in 1987 because fnaf 2, which takes place AT LEAST 2 years after fnaf 4, did. And last but not least, in fnaf 1, the phone guy says that “It's amazing how someone could live without the frontal lobe,” meaning that the person is still alive, or died of a different cause. However, as we know, the character from fnaf 4 DIED in the hospital due to his injuries, and if his injuries were so bad that they killed him, there is no way he could've survived until 1993. So there, it wasn't Fredbear.

As a matter of fact, it was probably Mangle. I know this because it had to be one of the Toy animatronics, and Mangle is the most likely due to her sharp teeth. The reason it has to be a Toy is because at the end of fnaf 2 (Which happens to take place in 1987) it is written in a newspaper that the Toys would be retired and that they would fix up the old animatronics to put to work if they ever reopened. So HAH! I win! But if you have proof that I'm wrong, go ahead and tell me, so I can prove you wrong too! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Actually, at the very least “…can live without a frontal lobe” means that the frontal lobe is at least not functional, and not taken out. So, you're wrong. But, to humor you, lets say that it maybe did mean that. The whole “Bite kid can't have nightmares” is not applicable to this situation.

Think about it. By saying that, we're basically thinking everything in FNAF is realistic. But it is not. I'll give you a couple examples.
In FNAF, there's clipping. Clipping as in 3d objects passing through other 3d objects, which is only possible in simulated 3d software.
Here's a couple pictures to name a few:
http://i.imgur.com/K6JXofr.png?1
http://i.imgur.com/ojrjjXB.png?1
http://i.imgur.com/2yrTEcN.png?1

So, we can't really say that FNAF is 100% realistic. And, we play in Freddy Fazbear's Pizza, not Fredbear's Family Diner.

And finally, the way you worded it is enough to disprove you. "no way he could've survived until 1993. You are correct. But, Phone Guy said he can live without the frontal lobe. These two words are slightly different. Live means to remain alive, while survive means to continue to remain alive. The bite child remained alive without his frontal lobe functioning, but he didn't continue to remain alive, and he eventually died. So, the bite child does fit the criteria of what phone guy said.

So yes, Fredbear did do the bite.

So what if there's clipping? Even the most realistic games have glitches…

fireaction2001 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

fireaction2001 wrote:

CupcakeCheeseCracker wrote:

sonictheanimator wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

MiniFluffyBug wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

freddycheesenugget wrote:

The bite was delivered by withered freddy

impossible, freddy was in parts and service at the time

how do you know?

the bite of 87 was happened in FNAF2

WRONG it happened in Fnaf 1 Either though Mangle Has the sharpest teeth Foxy Jaws
are hard enough to bite through the frontal lobe and give him bloody teeth

Well actually it happened in neither. The bite of 87' was caused by Fredbear aka Golden Freddy and took place in FredBear's Family diner. It was in a minigame in Fnaf 4 with you have made it through the 5th night likie I did. I witnessed it… I feel like my whole world was turned upside down for a minute at the end of the minigame.

*Buzzer sound* WRONG! That wasn't he bite of ‘87. Cause the bite of ’87 resulted in the loss of the victim's frontal lobe. However, in the fnaf 4 minigame, his frontal lobe wasn't removed, but his head was crushed. And for those of you who say that he had his frontal lobe removed after it was damaged, think again. In fnaf 4, the game consists of nightmares. However, people who have their frontal lobe removed CAN'T have nightmares. Also, if he had his frontal lobe removed, he wouldn't exhibit the behavior he does in the gameplay. If someone's frontal lobe is removed, and they think there is something scary in a hall or something, they would check the hall ONCE. They wouldn't check it again because the area of thinking that would make them think they had to check the hall again is in the FRONTAL LOBE. Also, fnaf 4 takes place before fnaf 2, because in fnaf 2 they said that Fredbear's Family Diner had been closed down for years. So fnaf 4 couldn't have taken place in 1987 because fnaf 2, which takes place AT LEAST 2 years after fnaf 4, did. And last but not least, in fnaf 1, the phone guy says that “It's amazing how someone could live without the frontal lobe,” meaning that the person is still alive, or died of a different cause. However, as we know, the character from fnaf 4 DIED in the hospital due to his injuries, and if his injuries were so bad that they killed him, there is no way he could've survived until 1993. So there, it wasn't Fredbear.

As a matter of fact, it was probably Mangle. I know this because it had to be one of the Toy animatronics, and Mangle is the most likely due to her sharp teeth. The reason it has to be a Toy is because at the end of fnaf 2 (Which happens to take place in 1987) it is written in a newspaper that the Toys would be retired and that they would fix up the old animatronics to put to work if they ever reopened. So HAH! I win! But if you have proof that I'm wrong, go ahead and tell me, so I can prove you wrong too! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Actually, at the very least “…can live without a frontal lobe” means that the frontal lobe is at least not functional, and not taken out. So, you're wrong. But, to humor you, lets say that it maybe did mean that. The whole “Bite kid can't have nightmares” is not applicable to this situation.

Think about it. By saying that, we're basically thinking everything in FNAF is realistic. But it is not. I'll give you a couple examples.
In FNAF, there's clipping. Clipping as in 3d objects passing through other 3d objects, which is only possible in simulated 3d software.
Here's a couple pictures to name a few:
http://i.imgur.com/K6JXofr.png?1
http://i.imgur.com/ojrjjXB.png?1
http://i.imgur.com/2yrTEcN.png?1

So, we can't really say that FNAF is 100% realistic. And, we play in Freddy Fazbear's Pizza, not Fredbear's Family Diner.

And finally, the way you worded it is enough to disprove you. "no way he could've survived until 1993. You are correct. But, Phone Guy said he can live without the frontal lobe. These two words are slightly different. Live means to remain alive, while survive means to continue to remain alive. The bite child remained alive without his frontal lobe functioning, but he didn't continue to remain alive, and he eventually died. So, the bite child does fit the criteria of what phone guy said.

So yes, Fredbear did do the bite.

LOL what about my other points I made? Like howthe bite of '87 happened in 1987? And how fnaf 4 took place before 1987 because in fnaf 2, which is CONFIRMED to take place in 1987, fredbears family diner had been closed for years…

Except we aren't playing in either FFP or FFD. We are playing in a fake restaurant, a staged workplace. My evidence is with my other post. And that's why FNAF 4 can take place in 87. Because the bite kid and the kid in the bedroom are 2 different kids.

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

fireaction2001 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

fireaction2001 wrote:

CupcakeCheeseCracker wrote:

sonictheanimator wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

MiniFluffyBug wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

freddycheesenugget wrote:

The bite was delivered by withered freddy

impossible, freddy was in parts and service at the time

how do you know?

the bite of 87 was happened in FNAF2

WRONG it happened in Fnaf 1 Either though Mangle Has the sharpest teeth Foxy Jaws
are hard enough to bite through the frontal lobe and give him bloody teeth

Well actually it happened in neither. The bite of 87' was caused by Fredbear aka Golden Freddy and took place in FredBear's Family diner. It was in a minigame in Fnaf 4 with you have made it through the 5th night likie I did. I witnessed it… I feel like my whole world was turned upside down for a minute at the end of the minigame.

*Buzzer sound* WRONG! That wasn't he bite of ‘87. Cause the bite of ’87 resulted in the loss of the victim's frontal lobe. However, in the fnaf 4 minigame, his frontal lobe wasn't removed, but his head was crushed. And for those of you who say that he had his frontal lobe removed after it was damaged, think again. In fnaf 4, the game consists of nightmares. However, people who have their frontal lobe removed CAN'T have nightmares. Also, if he had his frontal lobe removed, he wouldn't exhibit the behavior he does in the gameplay. If someone's frontal lobe is removed, and they think there is something scary in a hall or something, they would check the hall ONCE. They wouldn't check it again because the area of thinking that would make them think they had to check the hall again is in the FRONTAL LOBE. Also, fnaf 4 takes place before fnaf 2, because in fnaf 2 they said that Fredbear's Family Diner had been closed down for years. So fnaf 4 couldn't have taken place in 1987 because fnaf 2, which takes place AT LEAST 2 years after fnaf 4, did. And last but not least, in fnaf 1, the phone guy says that “It's amazing how someone could live without the frontal lobe,” meaning that the person is still alive, or died of a different cause. However, as we know, the character from fnaf 4 DIED in the hospital due to his injuries, and if his injuries were so bad that they killed him, there is no way he could've survived until 1993. So there, it wasn't Fredbear.

As a matter of fact, it was probably Mangle. I know this because it had to be one of the Toy animatronics, and Mangle is the most likely due to her sharp teeth. The reason it has to be a Toy is because at the end of fnaf 2 (Which happens to take place in 1987) it is written in a newspaper that the Toys would be retired and that they would fix up the old animatronics to put to work if they ever reopened. So HAH! I win! But if you have proof that I'm wrong, go ahead and tell me, so I can prove you wrong too! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Actually, at the very least “…can live without a frontal lobe” means that the frontal lobe is at least not functional, and not taken out. So, you're wrong. But, to humor you, lets say that it maybe did mean that. The whole “Bite kid can't have nightmares” is not applicable to this situation.

Think about it. By saying that, we're basically thinking everything in FNAF is realistic. But it is not. I'll give you a couple examples.
In FNAF, there's clipping. Clipping as in 3d objects passing through other 3d objects, which is only possible in simulated 3d software.
Here's a couple pictures to name a few:
http://i.imgur.com/K6JXofr.png?1
http://i.imgur.com/ojrjjXB.png?1
http://i.imgur.com/2yrTEcN.png?1

So, we can't really say that FNAF is 100% realistic. And, we play in Freddy Fazbear's Pizza, not Fredbear's Family Diner.

And finally, the way you worded it is enough to disprove you. "no way he could've survived until 1993. You are correct. But, Phone Guy said he can live without the frontal lobe. These two words are slightly different. Live means to remain alive, while survive means to continue to remain alive. The bite child remained alive without his frontal lobe functioning, but he didn't continue to remain alive, and he eventually died. So, the bite child does fit the criteria of what phone guy said.

So yes, Fredbear did do the bite.

LOL what about my other points I made? Like howthe bite of '87 happened in 1987? And how fnaf 4 took place before 1987 because in fnaf 2, which is CONFIRMED to take place in 1987, fredbears family diner had been closed for years…

Except we aren't playing in either FFP or FFD. We are playing in a fake restaurant, a staged workplace. My evidence is with my other post. And that's why FNAF 4 can take place in 87. Because the bite kid and the kid in the bedroom are 2 different kids.

I'm pretty sure that there's evidence that fnaf 5 takes place in 1983.

fireaction2001 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

fireaction2001 wrote:

Scratchingthecode97 wrote:

fireaction2001 wrote:

CupcakeCheeseCracker wrote:

sonictheanimator wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

MiniFluffyBug wrote:

Creeperfun wrote:

freddycheesenugget wrote:

The bite was delivered by withered freddy

impossible, freddy was in parts and service at the time

how do you know?

the bite of 87 was happened in FNAF2

WRONG it happened in Fnaf 1 Either though Mangle Has the sharpest teeth Foxy Jaws
are hard enough to bite through the frontal lobe and give him bloody teeth

Well actually it happened in neither. The bite of 87' was caused by Fredbear aka Golden Freddy and took place in FredBear's Family diner. It was in a minigame in Fnaf 4 with you have made it through the 5th night likie I did. I witnessed it… I feel like my whole world was turned upside down for a minute at the end of the minigame.

*Buzzer sound* WRONG! That wasn't he bite of ‘87. Cause the bite of ’87 resulted in the loss of the victim's frontal lobe. However, in the fnaf 4 minigame, his frontal lobe wasn't removed, but his head was crushed. And for those of you who say that he had his frontal lobe removed after it was damaged, think again. In fnaf 4, the game consists of nightmares. However, people who have their frontal lobe removed CAN'T have nightmares. Also, if he had his frontal lobe removed, he wouldn't exhibit the behavior he does in the gameplay. If someone's frontal lobe is removed, and they think there is something scary in a hall or something, they would check the hall ONCE. They wouldn't check it again because the area of thinking that would make them think they had to check the hall again is in the FRONTAL LOBE. Also, fnaf 4 takes place before fnaf 2, because in fnaf 2 they said that Fredbear's Family Diner had been closed down for years. So fnaf 4 couldn't have taken place in 1987 because fnaf 2, which takes place AT LEAST 2 years after fnaf 4, did. And last but not least, in fnaf 1, the phone guy says that “It's amazing how someone could live without the frontal lobe,” meaning that the person is still alive, or died of a different cause. However, as we know, the character from fnaf 4 DIED in the hospital due to his injuries, and if his injuries were so bad that they killed him, there is no way he could've survived until 1993. So there, it wasn't Fredbear.

As a matter of fact, it was probably Mangle. I know this because it had to be one of the Toy animatronics, and Mangle is the most likely due to her sharp teeth. The reason it has to be a Toy is because at the end of fnaf 2 (Which happens to take place in 1987) it is written in a newspaper that the Toys would be retired and that they would fix up the old animatronics to put to work if they ever reopened. So HAH! I win! But if you have proof that I'm wrong, go ahead and tell me, so I can prove you wrong too! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Actually, at the very least “…can live without a frontal lobe” means that the frontal lobe is at least not functional, and not taken out. So, you're wrong. But, to humor you, lets say that it maybe did mean that. The whole “Bite kid can't have nightmares” is not applicable to this situation.

Think about it. By saying that, we're basically thinking everything in FNAF is realistic. But it is not. I'll give you a couple examples.
In FNAF, there's clipping. Clipping as in 3d objects passing through other 3d objects, which is only possible in simulated 3d software.
Here's a couple pictures to name a few:
http://i.imgur.com/K6JXofr.png?1
http://i.imgur.com/ojrjjXB.png?1
http://i.imgur.com/2yrTEcN.png?1

So, we can't really say that FNAF is 100% realistic. And, we play in Freddy Fazbear's Pizza, not Fredbear's Family Diner.

And finally, the way you worded it is enough to disprove you. "no way he could've survived until 1993. You are correct. But, Phone Guy said he can live without the frontal lobe. These two words are slightly different. Live means to remain alive, while survive means to continue to remain alive. The bite child remained alive without his frontal lobe functioning, but he didn't continue to remain alive, and he eventually died. So, the bite child does fit the criteria of what phone guy said.

So yes, Fredbear did do the bite.

LOL what about my other points I made? Like howthe bite of '87 happened in 1987? And how fnaf 4 took place before 1987 because in fnaf 2, which is CONFIRMED to take place in 1987, fredbears family diner had been closed for years…

Except we aren't playing in either FFP or FFD. We are playing in a fake restaurant, a staged workplace. My evidence is with my other post. And that's why FNAF 4 can take place in 87. Because the bite kid and the kid in the bedroom are 2 different kids.

I'm pretty sure that there's evidence that fnaf 5 takes place in 1983.

That doesn't change anything, the “observatories” were used at different times.

computer_tron wrote:

xX_Mrs_Pink_xX wrote:

PrincessLuna789 wrote:

TonikDeluxe wrote:

Okay guys here is my theory i think that the puppet in steve from minecraft think about it steve makes blocks and the puppet is in a music box but that is also a block!!!!

… You're kidding right…?

ikr? that's related to fnaf and minecraft

if the creator of minecraft and FNaF were the same person (which their not, they are Scott and Markus) it might be a tiny bit possible… but i don't think so

maybe they know each other in a way and they decided this?

Okay, I think I just solved fnaf 5.

So, the main part of my theory is that Ennard is the mastermind behind it all. Ennard is sorta like a virus. He takes the form of a computer chip. The computer chips can communicate with each other sometimes. Ennard has inserted himself into every animatronic, as well as the voice you hear talking to you for most of the game (Hank unit I think?). Ennard is controlling all of them, trying to scoop you so he can use your body. However, Baby has managed to fight Ennard, only giving in under certain conditions (there being only one kid in the room). This explains why Hank unit (Again, I'm not sure about it's real name…) tells you to go as fast as you can through Ballora Gallery, while Baby tells you to go slowly. This also explains why the controlled shock doesn't work on Baby. It never worked on anyone in the first place! Ennard just made them respond to the shock as to lower suspicion, or something… I forgot lol. There are still a few holes in my theory, such as why Hank unit would tell you how to survive Funtime Foxy and Funtime Freddy.

Ennard's master plan was to scoop all of the animatronics, use their endoskeletons to build himself a body, and scoop you so he could take control of you. Why would he only want to scoop you? Why not the technicians from night 5? It's because he wanted to scoop someone with a position of power. You are William Afton, the owner of the company. The reason you didn't want your daughter near Baby was because you knew about Ennard the whole time. However, you didn't know how Ennard spread. You didn't know he was the chip. That along with the fact that you didn't know Hank unit was also Ennard, is how he was able to trick you. Wait, scratch that. Your name is Mike, as seen above the keypad. And Baby clearly states: “You're new”. Sooooooooo…… I still don't know why Afton's daughter isn't allowed near Baby… Oh well.

I think that Ennard originated from a super smart AI, which they put in the animatronics. However, Ennard was too smart, or there was a fatal glitch. Ennard became evil.

I also figured out Shadow Freddy. Shadow Freddy is the suit that the Purple Guy used to destroy the animatronics. It's also the suit you hide in in night 4 of fnaf 5. The suit in fnaf 5 can't be Fredbear or Spingbonnie because their faces don't open up. I think that Freddy Fazbear's Pizza came before Fredbear's Family Diner. FFP then closed down, and FFD/Afton Robotics opened up. FFD closed down and FFP returned. FFP closed down again but returned once again. FFP closed down for the last time and Fazbear's Fright almost opened but was burned to the ground. And that is the end of that.

Please tell me if I left anything out. Also please help me figure out exactly what the Obsv. rooms are.

fireaction2001 wrote:

Okay, I think I just solved fnaf 5.

So, the main part of my theory is that Ennard is the mastermind behind it all. Ennard is sorta like a virus. He takes the form of a computer chip. The computer chips can communicate with each other sometimes. Ennard has inserted himself into every animatronic, as well as the voice you hear talking to you for most of the game (Hank unit I think?). Ennard is controlling all of them, trying to scoop you so he can use your body. However, Baby has managed to fight Ennard, only giving in under certain conditions (there being only one kid in the room). This explains why Hank unit (Again, I'm not sure about it's real name…) tells you to go as fast as you can through Ballora Gallery, while Baby tells you to go slowly. This also explains why the controlled shock doesn't work on Baby. It never worked on anyone in the first place! Ennard just made them respond to the shock as to lower suspicion, or something… I forgot lol. There are still a few holes in my theory, such as why Hank unit would tell you how to survive Funtime Foxy and Funtime Freddy.

Ennard's master plan was to scoop all of the animatronics, use their endoskeletons to build himself a body, and scoop you so he could take control of you. Why would he only want to scoop you? Why not the technicians from night 5? It's because he wanted to scoop someone with a position of power. You are William Afton, the owner of the company. The reason you didn't want your daughter near Baby was because you knew about Ennard the whole time. However, you didn't know how Ennard spread. You didn't know he was the chip. That along with the fact that you didn't know Hank unit was also Ennard, is how he was able to trick you. Wait, scratch that. Your name is Mike, as seen above the keypad. And Baby clearly states: “You're new”. Sooooooooo…… I still don't know why Afton's daughter isn't allowed near Baby… Oh well.

I think that Ennard originated from a super smart AI, which they put in the animatronics. However, Ennard was too smart, or there was a fatal glitch. Ennard became evil.

I also figured out Shadow Freddy. Shadow Freddy is the suit that the Purple Guy used to destroy the animatronics. It's also the suit you hide in in night 4 of fnaf 5. The suit in fnaf 5 can't be Fredbear or Spingbonnie because their faces don't open up. I think that Freddy Fazbear's Pizza came before Fredbear's Family Diner. FFP then closed down, and FFD/Afton Robotics opened up. FFD closed down and FFP returned. FFP closed down again but returned once again. FFP closed down for the last time and Fazbear's Fright almost opened but was burned to the ground. And that is the end of that.

Please tell me if I left anything out. Also please help me figure out exactly what the Obsv. rooms are.

Just two things. One, the springlock suit is new, as neither Shadow Freddy nor any other existing springlock suit has opening faceplates.
And, the observatories are these (Spoilers):