I've been working on reskinning TheMonsterOfTheDeep's custom reporter extension so it looks more like the interface for creating actual custom blocks.


Here are some screenshots of my progress:

https://github.com/LLK/scratchx/issues/24 Ughhh
But imo that looks even better than the Scratch dialog

Jonathan50 wrote:

https://github.com/LLK/scratchx/issues/24 Ughhh

Is it not opening for you? Lame. I probs should've tested it in other browsers. Are you getting any other errors like in the console and stuff?

Jonathan50 wrote:

But imo that looks even better than the Scratch dialog

Lol thanks, I just hacked together chunks of Pixie and Scratchblocks until it did what I wanted

NickyNouse wrote:

Jonathan50 wrote:

https://github.com/LLK/scratchx/issues/24 Ughhh

Is it not opening for you? Lame. I probs should've tested it in other browsers. Are you getting any other errors like in the console and stuff?

No, it isn't your fault. The ScratchX editor doesn't load at all.

Jonathan50 wrote:

NickyNouse wrote:

Jonathan50 wrote:

https://github.com/LLK/scratchx/issues/24 Ughhh

Is it not opening for you? Lame. I probs should've tested it in other browsers. Are you getting any other errors like in the console and stuff?

No, it isn't your fault. The ScratchX editor doesn't load at all.

phew. that's lame but at least I don't have to fix it

goshdarned 60 second rule

Updated:

• no checkboxes next to parameters
  
• reordered blocks to be less confusing
  
• added space between each custom block's blocks
  
• added tilde to beginning of parameter names to make them easier to differentiate
  

I don't think I actually ever made the dialog do anything…

But thanks for this, this is cool. I'm really bad at HTML/CSS so I don't think I could do this…

I really do need to rework some of the code behind the extension, though… it doesn't work very well right now.

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

I don't think I actually ever made the dialog do anything…

But thanks for this, this is cool. I'm really bad at HTML/CSS so I don't think I could do this…

I really do need to rework some of the code behind the extension, though… it doesn't work very well right now.

what matters is that it works lol

NickyNouse wrote:

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

I don't think I actually ever made the dialog do anything…

But thanks for this, this is cool. I'm really bad at HTML/CSS so I don't think I could do this…

I really do need to rework some of the code behind the extension, though… it doesn't work very well right now.

what matters is that it works lol

Except it doesn't - the reload block will create duplicate reporters and I have no idea how those will behave.

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

NickyNouse wrote:

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

I don't think I actually ever made the dialog do anything…

But thanks for this, this is cool. I'm really bad at HTML/CSS so I don't think I could do this…

I really do need to rework some of the code behind the extension, though… it doesn't work very well right now.

what matters is that it works lol

Except it doesn't - the reload block will create duplicate reporters and I have no idea how those will behave.

you could assign each custom reporter a number ID instead of using its name as its name, then they'll probably only look like duplicates

NickyNouse wrote:

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

NickyNouse wrote:

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

I don't think I actually ever made the dialog do anything…

But thanks for this, this is cool. I'm really bad at HTML/CSS so I don't think I could do this…

I really do need to rework some of the code behind the extension, though… it doesn't work very well right now.

what matters is that it works lol

Except it doesn't - the reload block will create duplicate reporters and I have no idea how those will behave.

you could assign each custom reporter a number ID instead of using its name as its name, then they'll probably only look like duplicates

Well I actually have no idea why that happens in the original script, because I was looking through it earlier today and it seems that it should just overwrite the old one… maybe it just adds duplicate blocks somehow?

Anyways I'm redoing them sortof so that should be fun.

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

NickyNouse wrote:

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

NickyNouse wrote:

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

I don't think I actually ever made the dialog do anything…

But thanks for this, this is cool. I'm really bad at HTML/CSS so I don't think I could do this…

I really do need to rework some of the code behind the extension, though… it doesn't work very well right now.

what matters is that it works lol

Except it doesn't - the reload block will create duplicate reporters and I have no idea how those will behave.

you could assign each custom reporter a number ID instead of using its name as its name, then they'll probably only look like duplicates

Well I actually have no idea why that happens in the original script, because I was looking through it earlier today and it seems that it should just overwrite the old one… maybe it just adds duplicate blocks somehow?

Anyways I'm redoing them sortof so that should be fun.

ooh lemme know how that goes

NickyNouse wrote:

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

NickyNouse wrote:

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

NickyNouse wrote:

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

I don't think I actually ever made the dialog do anything…

But thanks for this, this is cool. I'm really bad at HTML/CSS so I don't think I could do this…

I really do need to rework some of the code behind the extension, though… it doesn't work very well right now.

what matters is that it works lol

Except it doesn't - the reload block will create duplicate reporters and I have no idea how those will behave.

you could assign each custom reporter a number ID instead of using its name as its name, then they'll probably only look like duplicates

Well I actually have no idea why that happens in the original script, because I was looking through it earlier today and it seems that it should just overwrite the old one… maybe it just adds duplicate blocks somehow?

Anyways I'm redoing them sortof so that should be fun.

ooh lemme know how that goes

It's going really well so far - everything is working except for reloading blocks with arguments and escaped characters, but I really need to go to bed so I can't work on it right now.

^ I lied I stayed up and fixed it

sort of - there are still problems (it reloads parameters for blocks that shouldn't be reloaded and escapes still don't work)

Once this is finished make sure you submit it

savaka wrote:

Once this is finished make sure you submit it

will do

it only works on google chrome, i think

IIGunnerII wrote:

it only works on google chrome, i think

and also every-time i try to make a Boolean, it's just a reporter
i think you should fix those

How did you program the dialog boxes to look like they do in base scratch? I am currently working on an extension that would use things like that.

Current project: [s3Blocks: scratchblocks rewritten for Scratch 3.0] ::#4b4a60 //https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/topic/290031/ Basically done!

NitroCipher wrote:

How did you program the dialog boxes to look like they do in base scratch? I am currently working on an extension that would use things like that.

Here's my code to make the dialog box:
https://github.com/Airhogs777/custom-reporters/blob/gh-pages/customreporters.css
https://github.com/Airhogs777/custom-reporters/blob/gh-pages/dialog.html

the dialogs are adapted from Pixie, which is Scratch 2.0 rewritten in HTML/JS: https://github.com/nathan/pixie