f1lip wrote:

-stache- wrote:

Sigton wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

So to make sure:

R + G + B = Value?
R - G - B = Saturation (or something similar?)
R * 255 + B * 255* 255 + G * 255 * 255 * 255 = Hue?

I don't know if there is a mathematical formula for it, sorry
I can try work one out, there must be a relation somewhere.

Sigton

I found this which might work: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/43044/algorithm-to-randomly-generate-an-aesthetically-pleasing-color-palette

A very pleasing color pallete :3 J1, would you mind adding in the colors on this color pallete? Thanks for your help, -stache-, I'll make a signature for you.

-stache- wrote:

Actually, its a color palette generator… Also, I don't really need a sig…

jokebookservice1 wrote:

Macie1234 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

WARNING: This post ontains a link outside of Scratch (to website I have control over). It is very safe but still, be careful when navigating away from Scratch

Here it is: Link

the colors are soo dull

If you knew how to make them less dull, please let me know. ATM it selects a random colour, that does not contain a, b, c, d, e, or f in its hex representation. Would it be less dull if I allowed those?

24691357 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

Macie1234 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

WARNING: This post ontains a link outside of Scratch (to website I have control over). It is very safe but still, be careful when navigating away from Scratch

Here it is: Link

the colors are soo dull

If you knew how to make them less dull, please let me know. ATM it selects a random colour, that does not contain a, b, c, d, e, or f in its hex representation. Would it be less dull if I allowed those?

a, b, c, d, e, f are lighter

jokebookservice1 wrote:

24691357 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

Macie1234 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

WARNING: This post ontains a link outside of Scratch (to website I have control over). It is very safe but still, be careful when navigating away from Scratch

Here it is: Link

the colors are soo dull

If you knew how to make them less dull, please let me know. ATM it selects a random colour, that does not contain a, b, c, d, e, or f in its hex representation. Would it be less dull if I allowed those?

a, b, c, d, e, f are lighter

Yes, but perhaps removing the low ones like 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and adding h hih nes in a, b, c, d, e, f would od the trick? Anyway, I like the best answer in tne stackoerflow question, so I'll probably do that

-stache- wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

24691357 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

Macie1234 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

WARNING: This post ontains a link outside of Scratch (to website I have control over). It is very safe but still, be careful when navigating away from Scratch

Here it is: Link

the colors are soo dull

If you knew how to make them less dull, please let me know. ATM it selects a random colour, that does not contain a, b, c, d, e, or f in its hex representation. Would it be less dull if I allowed those?

a, b, c, d, e, f are lighter

Yes, but perhaps removing the low ones like 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and adding h hih nes in a, b, c, d, e, f would od the trick? Anyway, I like the best answer in tne stackoerflow question, so I'll probably do that

I PRed it already.

jokebookservice1 wrote:

-stache- wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

24691357 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

Macie1234 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

WARNING: This post ontains a link outside of Scratch (to website I have control over). It is very safe but still, be careful when navigating away from Scratch

Here it is: Link

the colors are soo dull

If you knew how to make them less dull, please let me know. ATM it selects a random colour, that does not contain a, b, c, d, e, or f in its hex representation. Would it be less dull if I allowed those?

a, b, c, d, e, f are lighter

Yes, but perhaps removing the low ones like 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and adding h hih nes in a, b, c, d, e, f would od the trick? Anyway, I like the best answer in tne stackoerflow question, so I'll probably do that

I PRed it already.

Ok, thanks
Your first PR made it go weird, giving the hex colours long-strings with decimal points as if it had not been rounded…

jokebookservice1 wrote:

24691357 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

Macie1234 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

WARNING: This post ontains a link outside of Scratch (to website I have control over). It is very safe but still, be careful when navigating away from Scratch

Here it is: Link

the colors are soo dull

If you knew how to make them less dull, please let me know. ATM it selects a random colour, that does not contain a, b, c, d, e, or f in its hex representation. Would it be less dull if I allowed those?

a, b, c, d, e, f are lighter

Yes, but perhaps removing the low ones like 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and adding h hih nes in a, b, c, d, e, f would od the trick? Anyway, I like the best answer in tne stackoerflow question, so I'll probably do that

24691357 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

24691357 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

Macie1234 wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

WARNING: This post ontains a link outside of Scratch (to website I have control over). It is very safe but still, be careful when navigating away from Scratch

Here it is: Link

the colors are soo dull

If you knew how to make them less dull, please let me know. ATM it selects a random colour, that does not contain a, b, c, d, e, or f in its hex representation. Would it be less dull if I allowed those?

a, b, c, d, e, f are lighter

Yes, but perhaps removing the low ones like 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and adding h hih nes in a, b, c, d, e, f would od the trick? Anyway, I like the best answer in tne stackoerflow question, so I'll probably do that

Here are examples of texts, one excluding abcdef and other excluding 012345. 6789 is included in both.
Excluding high text
Excluding low text
We just need to change very light colors (such as the o above)

-stache- wrote:

I m a d e t h e n e w c o l o r g e n e r a t o r t h a t m a k e s t h e c o l o r s m o r e v i s i b l e t h a n t h e y w e r e i n t h e o r i g i n a l g e n e r a t o r

jokebookservice1 wrote:

-stache- wrote:

I m a d e t h e n e w c o l o r g e n e r a t o r t h a t m a k e s t h e c o l o r s m o r e v i s i b l e t h a n t h e y w e r e i n t h e o r i g i n a l g e n e r a t o r

D o y o u t h i n k t h e g e n e r a t o r ( t h a t y o u m a d e v e r y w e l l , I c r e d i t e d y o u o n t h e p a g e w h i l e a l s o a d d e d a l i v e u p d a t e ) s h o u l d p u t b o l d t a g s f o r t h e B B C o d e v e r s i o n ? T h i s m a k e s t h e c o l o u r s s t a n d o u t e v e n b e t t e r ! W h a t d o y o u t h i n k ? A l s o , I w i l l s h o r t l y r e o v e c o l o u r t a g s a r o u n d w h i t e s p a c e c h a r a t e r s a n d m a k e t h e l i v e u p d a t e s h o w e x t r a w h i t e s p a c e s a s & n b s p ;

-stache- wrote:

I m a d e t h e n e w c o l o r g e n e r a t o r t h a t m a k e s t h e c o l o r s m o r e v i s i b l e t h a n t h e y w e r e i n t h e o r i g i n a l g e n e r a t o r

jokebookservice1 wrote:

-stache- wrote:

I m a d e t h e n e w c o l o r g e n e r a t o r t h a t m a k e s t h e c o l o r s m o r e v i s i b l e t h a n t h e y w e r e i n t h e o r i g i n a l g e n e r a t o r

D o y o u t h i n k t h e g e n e r a t o r ( t h a t y o u m a d e v e r y w e l l , I c r e d i t e d y o u o n t h e p a g e w h i l e a l s o a d d e d a l i v e u p d a t e ) s h o u l d p u t b o l d t a g s f o r t h e B B C o d e v e r s i o n ? T h i s m a k e s t h e c o l o u r s s t a n d o u t e v e n b e t t e r ! W h a t d o y o u t h i n k ? A l s o , I w i l l s h o r t l y r e o v e c o l o u r t a g s a r o u n d w h i t e s p a c e c h a r a t e r s a n d m a k e t h e l i v e u p d a t e s h o w e x t r a w h i t e s p a c e s a s & n b s p ;

f1lip wrote:

W a i t , - s t a c h e - i s @ M a c i e 1 2 3 4 ? @ J 1 - M a k e y o u s u r e y o u g i v e c r e d i t t o m e - I m a d e t h e s u g g e s t i o n w h i c h i n s p i r e d y o u . A s f o r e v e r y t h i n g e l s e - S c r a t c h O n ! P l u s , I ' m m a k i n g a n A T T o p i c . : P
I n t h e t e x t e n g i n e , t h e c o l o r s l o o k s s p a c e d r e a l l y g o o d o n t h e g e n e r a t o r w e b p a g e , o n S c r a t c h t h e s p a c i n g m e s s e s u p a b i t . C a n y o u f i x t h a t ?
L o l r a i n b o w c h a t

jokebookservice1 wrote:

f1lip wrote:

W a i t , - s t a c h e - i s @ M a c i e 1 2 3 4 ? @ J 1 - M a k e y o u s u r e y o u g i v e c r e d i t t o m e - I m a d e t h e s u g g e s t i o n w h i c h i n s p i r e d y o u . A s f o r e v e r y t h i n g e l s e - S c r a t c h O n ! P l u s , I ' m m a k i n g a n A T T o p i c . : P
I n t h e t e x t e n g i n e , t h e c o l o r s l o o k s s p a c e d r e a l l y g o o d o n t h e g e n e r a t o r w e b p a g e , o n S c r a t c h t h e s p a c i n g m e s s e s u p a b i t . C a n y o u f i x t h a t ?
L o l r a i n b o w c h a t

I s t h i s s p a m ? L o l . A n y w a y : T h e p a c i n g p r o b l e m s c o u l d b e b e c a u s s e I u s e a n o n - b r e a k i n g s p a c e w h i l e S c r a t c h m i g h t u s e a r e g u k l a r s p a c e ? N o t s u r e t h o u g h . L o o k s l i k e i t m a k e s t h e t h i n g o n t h e w e b s i t e m e s u p . I ' l l s e e w h a t I c a n d o .

-stache- wrote:

jokebookservice1 wrote:

f1lip wrote:

W a i t , - s t a c h e - i s @ M a c i e 1 2 3 4 ? @ J 1 - M a k e y o u s u r e y o u g i v e c r e d i t t o m e - I m a d e t h e s u g g e s t i o n w h i c h i n s p i r e d y o u . A s f o r e v e r y t h i n g e l s e - S c r a t c h O n ! P l u s , I ' m m a k i n g a n A T T o p i c . : P
I n t h e t e x t e n g i n e , t h e c o l o r s l o o k s s p a c e d r e a l l y g o o d o n t h e g e n e r a t o r w e b p a g e , o n S c r a t c h t h e s p a c i n g m e s s e s u p a b i t . C a n y o u f i x t h a t ?
L o l r a i n b o w c h a t

I s t h i s s p a m ? L o l . A n y w a y : T h e p a c i n g p r o b l e m s c o u l d b e b e c a u s s e I u s e a n o n - b r e a k i n g s p a c e w h i l e S c r a t c h m i g h t u s e a r e g u k l a r s p a c e ? N o t s u r e t h o u g h . L o o k s l i k e i t m a k e s t h e t h i n g o n t h e w e b s i t e m e s u p . I ' l l s e e w h a t I c a n d o .

Pacing???