Stop asking for credit when people remix your projects

DaSpudLord

Honeytata wrote:
DaSpudLord wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
Nice job at ignoring my post.
It's NOT scratch's job to teach people to give credit. That's all of the schools jobs.
But why can't Scratch teach it too? If you learn something in more than one place, it reinforces it and makes it more likely to remain engraved in your head.
Is that scratch's purpose? To teach people how to credit?
I don't think so.

A phone's purpose wasn't meant to be for surfing the web. Yet now we have phones that do exactly that. Your point?

Last edited by DaSpudLord (May 23, 2016 20:38:56)

Honeytata

DaSpudLord wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
DaSpudLord wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
Nice job at ignoring my post.
It's NOT scratch's job to teach people to give credit. That's all of the schools jobs.
But why can't Scratch teach it too? If you learn something in more than one place, it reinforces it and makes it more likely to remain engraved in your head.
Is that scratch's purpose? To teach people how to credit?
I don't think so.
A phone's purpose wasn't meant to be for surfing the web. Yet now we have phones that do exactly that. Your point?

But surfing on a phone is a completely different topic,

this fight is annoying and useless, so I'm going to go. Goodbye.

NanoRook

Honeytata wrote:
Nice job at ignoring my post.
It's NOT scratch's job to teach people to give credit. That's all of the schools jobs.
I
am
ignorant

They are following a Creative Commons license. Which REQUIRES you to give credit. So technically, Scratch is teaching people to give credit. It doesn't have to be someone's job to do something, yet they can do it anyway. Cavemen back in prehistoric times didn't have to tell others if someone died in the hunting party, yet they did anyways.

DaSpudLord

Honeytata wrote:
DaSpudLord wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
DaSpudLord wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
Nice job at ignoring my post.
It's NOT scratch's job to teach people to give credit. That's all of the schools jobs.
But why can't Scratch teach it too? If you learn something in more than one place, it reinforces it and makes it more likely to remain engraved in your head.
Is that scratch's purpose? To teach people how to credit?
I don't think so.
A phone's purpose wasn't meant to be for surfing the web. Yet now we have phones that do exactly that. Your point?
But surfing on a phone is a completely different topic

How? Please explain the difference in the context of this argument.

Last edited by DaSpudLord (May 23, 2016 20:41:47)

Honeytata

NanoRook wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
Nice job at ignoring my post.
It's NOT scratch's job to teach people to give credit. That's all of the schools jobs.
I
am
ignorant
They are following a person on twitter, who has a drivers license. Which REQUIRES you to give credit cards. So technically, Scratch is teaching people to give credit cards. It doesn't have to be someone's job to do something, yet they can do it anyway. Cavemen back in prehistoric times didn't have to tell others if someone died in the hunting party, yet they did anyways.

Nice edit you made, there, lemme edit yours, too.

Honeytata

You know, I was never aware of the fact that they had a “Creative commons” license, or that they require it on the guidelines.

Cya, this is POINTLESS

DaSpudLord

Honeytata wrote:
NanoRook wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
Nice job at ignoring my post.
It's NOT scratch's job to teach people to give credit. That's all of the schools jobs.
I
am
ignorant
They are following a person on twitter, who has a drivers license. Which REQUIRES you to give credit cards. So technically, Scratch is teaching people to give credit cards. It doesn't have to be someone's job to do something, yet they can do it anyway. Cavemen back in prehistoric times didn't have to tell others if someone died in the hunting party, yet they did anyways.
Nice edit you made, there, lemme edit yours, too.

Your edit makes no sense. NanoRook's does.

You appear to be avoiding NanoRook's argument.

NanoRook

Honeytata wrote:
NanoRook wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
Nice job at ignoring my post.
It's NOT scratch's job to teach people to give credit. That's all of the schools jobs.
I
am
ignorant
They are following a person on twitter, who has a drivers license. Which REQUIRES you to give credit cards. So technically, Scratch is teaching people to give credit cards. It doesn't have to be someone's job to do something, yet they can do it anyway. Cavemen back in prehistoric times didn't have to tell others if someone died in the hunting party, yet they did anyways.
Nice edit you made, there, lemme edit yours, too.

Thanks. That was actually a pretty funny edit.

Anyways: You're completely missing the point. This is a legal license they have to follow. Not kindergarten. If they don't follow the law, Scratch Team could get the website shut down.

Honeytata

DaSpudLord wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
NanoRook wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
Nice job at ignoring my post.
It's NOT scratch's job to teach people to give credit. That's all of the schools jobs.
I
am
ignorant
They are following a person on twitter, who has a drivers license. Which REQUIRES you to give credit cards. So technically, Scratch is teaching people to give credit cards. It doesn't have to be someone's job to do something, yet they can do it anyway. Cavemen back in prehistoric times didn't have to tell others if someone died in the hunting party, yet they did anyways.
Nice edit you made, there, lemme edit yours, too.
Your edit makes no sense. NanoRook's does.

You appear to be avoiding NanoRook's argument.

Uh oh! Someone doesn't know what a joke is.

Kid, I don't know why you're trying to ignore my posts saying “I don't want to argue” because 1. It's 6 AM where I am, and I'm pretty tired. 2. This fight is, once again, P O I N T L E S S

NanoRook

Honeytata wrote:
DaSpudLord wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
NanoRook wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
Nice job at ignoring my post.
It's NOT scratch's job to teach people to give credit. That's all of the schools jobs.
I
am
ignorant
They are following a person on twitter, who has a drivers license. Which REQUIRES you to give credit cards. So technically, Scratch is teaching people to give credit cards. It doesn't have to be someone's job to do something, yet they can do it anyway. Cavemen back in prehistoric times didn't have to tell others if someone died in the hunting party, yet they did anyways.
Nice edit you made, there, lemme edit yours, too.
Your edit makes no sense. NanoRook's does.

You appear to be avoiding NanoRook's argument.
Uh oh! Someone doesn't know what a joke is.

Kid, I don't know why you're trying to ignore my posts saying “I don't want to argue” because 1. It's 6 AM where I am, and I'm pretty tired. 2. This fight is, once again, P O I N T L E S S

Then stop following it then

and don't make hostile posts maybe

you're still avoiding the argument either way. And go to bed if you're tired. It's that simple.

Honeytata

NanoRook wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
DaSpudLord wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
NanoRook wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
Nice job at ignoring my post.
It's NOT scratch's job to teach people to give credit. That's all of the schools jobs.
I
am
ignorant
They are following a person on twitter, who has a drivers license. Which REQUIRES you to give credit cards. So technically, Scratch is teaching people to give credit cards. It doesn't have to be someone's job to do something, yet they can do it anyway. Cavemen back in prehistoric times didn't have to tell others if someone died in the hunting party, yet they did anyways.
Nice edit you made, there, lemme edit yours, too.
Your edit makes no sense. NanoRook's does.

You appear to be avoiding NanoRook's argument.
Uh oh! Someone doesn't know what a joke is.

Kid, I don't know why you're trying to ignore my posts saying “I don't want to argue” because 1. It's 6 AM where I am, and I'm pretty tired. 2. This fight is, once again, P O I N T L E S S
Then stop following it then

and don't make hostile posts maybe

you're still avoiding the argument either way. And go to bed if you're tired. It's that simple.

I pretty much owned up to me being wrong, I said that I didnt know about the creative commons (Which my youtube is a part of,) and the whole community guidelines.

I'm also saying I dont wanna argue because I owned up to my defeat, so lemme ask you this, why should we still fight when I said that I was wrong?

NanoRook

Honeytata wrote:
NanoRook wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
DaSpudLord wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
NanoRook wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
Nice job at ignoring my post.
It's NOT scratch's job to teach people to give credit. That's all of the schools jobs.
I
am
ignorant
They are following a person on twitter, who has a drivers license. Which REQUIRES you to give credit cards. So technically, Scratch is teaching people to give credit cards. It doesn't have to be someone's job to do something, yet they can do it anyway. Cavemen back in prehistoric times didn't have to tell others if someone died in the hunting party, yet they did anyways.
Nice edit you made, there, lemme edit yours, too.
Your edit makes no sense. NanoRook's does.

You appear to be avoiding NanoRook's argument.
Uh oh! Someone doesn't know what a joke is.

Kid, I don't know why you're trying to ignore my posts saying “I don't want to argue” because 1. It's 6 AM where I am, and I'm pretty tired. 2. This fight is, once again, P O I N T L E S S
Then stop following it then

and don't make hostile posts maybe

you're still avoiding the argument either way. And go to bed if you're tired. It's that simple.
I pretty much owned up to me being wrong, I said that I didnt know about the creative commons (Which my youtube is a part of,) and the whole community guidelines.

I'm also saying I dont wanna argue because I owned up to my defeat, so lemme ask you this, why should we still fight when I said that I was wrong?

because you never said you were wrong

i've gone down all the posts and there's nowhere you admitted defeat

also you can request this to be closed.

Honeytata

Honeytata wrote:
You know, I was never aware of the fact that they had a “Creative commons” license, or that they require it on the guidelines.

Cya, this is POINTLESS

NanoRook

Honeytata wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
You know, I was never aware of the fact that they had a “Creative commons” license, or that they require it on the guidelines.

Cya, this is POINTLESS

you still came back to the argument once more

eh i'm unfollowing this thread because you're still missing the point

miniepicness

Honeytata wrote:
Plus, its more annoying when 12 year olds are begging for credit on their project about scratch cat spinning in circles

Yes! SO MAKE THE OTHER PERSON GIVE CREDIT, you finally understand!

Honeytata

miniepicness wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
Plus, its more annoying when 12 year olds are begging for credit on their project about scratch cat spinning in circles
Yes! SO MAKE THE OTHER PERSON GIVE CREDIT, you finally understand!

I am disappointed in you.

miniepicness

Honeytata wrote:
miniepicness wrote:
Honeytata wrote:
Plus, its more annoying when 12 year olds are begging for credit on their project about scratch cat spinning in circles
Yes! SO MAKE THE OTHER PERSON GIVE CREDIT, you finally understand!
I am disappointed in you.

Sorry.

DownsGameClub

Guys, please calm down.

Sorry, but I won't support. The original project is only to help with the credits, but it is more like a “dependent credits”, where it simply only links the original project. The user actually has to give official credit, or else the original project link is really just not explanatory. Also, many sprites and other scripts also are borrowed from other projects. You have to give credit if you used any borrowed scripts or sprites, etc.

Also, it clearly states in the community guidelines- https://scratch.mit.edu/community_guidelines/

Share. You are free to remix projects, ideas, images, or anything else you find on Scratch – and anyone can use anything that you share. Be sure to give credit when you remix.

Last edited by DownsGameClub (May 23, 2016 21:41:09)

scrooge100

Honeytata wrote:
There's clearly an “original project” button shown in the corner of a remix, stop asking for credit if you already HAVE CREDIT!

We didn't ignore your post, its a rule in scratch

Harakou

Even though we have an automatic attribution system with remixes, It's considered gracious to manually acknowledge the help you got from the original creator. Regardless of the nature of their project, if you remixed it, clearly their project was worth using! Consider giving credit a way of thanking them for their original work, from which you benefited.

Closing as rejected; it's exactly opposite what we say in the guidelines. Please remember to remain respectful in your posts in the future.

Discuss Scratch