Mrcomputer1 wrote:

I think it is apps that download code aren't allowed

import urllib2
eval(urllib2.urlopen(raw_input('URL to eval>').read())

liam48D wrote:

Mrcomputer1 wrote:

I think it is apps that download code aren't allowed

import urllib2
eval(urllib2.urlopen(raw_input('URL to eval>').read())

So.. I guess we should take down Pythonista?

Mrcomputer1 wrote:

liam48D wrote:

Mrcomputer1 wrote:

I think it is apps that download code aren't allowed

import urllib2
eval(urllib2.urlopen(raw_input('URL to eval>').read())

So.. I guess we should take down Pythonista?

That would not be the app downloading the code but the user
Or maybe Apple's app reviewers just don't know python

liam48D wrote:

Mrcomputer1 wrote:

liam48D wrote:

Mrcomputer1 wrote:

I think it is apps that download code aren't allowed

import urllib2
eval(urllib2.urlopen(raw_input('URL to eval>').read())

So.. I guess we should take down Pythonista?

That would not be the app downloading the code but the user
Or maybe Apple's app reviewers just don't know python

Wouldn't it be the user downloading the code if they use “file -> download project”?

Or, wouldn't it be the app downloading the code because Python compiles to C [right?], which is run by the app, not the user?

Mrcomputer1 wrote:

liam48D wrote:

Mrcomputer1 wrote:

liam48D wrote:

Mrcomputer1 wrote:

I think it is apps that download code aren't allowed

import urllib2
eval(urllib2.urlopen(raw_input('URL to eval>').read())

So.. I guess we should take down Pythonista?

That would not be the app downloading the code but the user
Or maybe Apple's app reviewers just don't know python

Wouldn't it be the user downloading the code if they use “file -> download project”?

Or, wouldn't it be the app downloading the code because Python compiles to C [right?], which is run by the app, not the user?

By the user downloading the code I meant that they create the code that downloads it and its not the app's code

joefarebrother wrote:

So could the ST now try to put the scratch app back on the app store?

Tymewalk wrote:

joefarebrother wrote:

So could the ST now try to put the scratch app back on the app store?

I guess in theory, yes.

Personally I think they should also add it to Android - I've seen plenty of Android coding apps there, and Google tends to be a little more friendly about publishing your app.

-Radical- wrote:

Apple does not allow applications that interpret code (which is what Scratch is).

liam48D wrote:

“Can't have apps that you can code with” Why is Pythonista allowed, then? Hopscotch is, too, and there are a number of other coding apps on the App Store. There has to be something different about Scratch.

lugga wrote:

There's an android app for making android apps in java! AIDE its called. Uses the android sdk to develop apps right on your android device, no computer needed, it's the best.

liam48D wrote:

Or, wouldn't it be the app downloading the code because Python compiles to C [right?], which is run by the app, not the user?

Jonathan50 wrote:

liam48D wrote:

Or, wouldn't it be the app downloading the code because Python compiles to C [right?], which is run by the app, not the user?

No. Python compiles to Python bytecode, which is then interpreted.

Jonathan50 wrote:

liam48D wrote:

Or, wouldn't it be the app downloading the code because Python compiles to C [right?], which is run by the app, not the user?

No. Python compiles to Python bytecode, which is then interpreted.

liam48D wrote:

Jonathan50 wrote:

liam48D wrote:

Or, wouldn't it be the app downloading the code because Python compiles to C [right?], which is run by the app, not the user?

No. Python compiles to Python bytecode, which is then interpreted.

Ahh, I see.

The-Ender-Blade wrote:

Apple revoked the scratch app for violating the rules (can't have apps that you can code with) so why is an app that is almost exactly like scratch called hopscotch on the front page of the App Store?