Jonathan50 wrote:

BookOwl wrote:

Here is the regex used to match unquoted symbols:

[0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ!#$%&()*+,-./:;<=>?@\\^_|~]+

Quoted symbols are the same, except that there is a ` in front of the character class.

Why not

[0-9a-zA-Z!#$%&()*+,-./:;<=>?@\\^_|~]+

?

Because I generated that string dynamically with Python and I was to lazy to edit it to that.

__init__ wrote:

SUBLIME IS BEST USE IT PLS

Please.
Brackets
it starts up faster than NPP for me…given that it's literally node.js + html I'm not sure how exactly that works :P

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

__init__ wrote:

SUBLIME IS BEST USE IT PLS

Please.
Brackets
it starts up faster than NPP for me…given that it's literally node.js + html I'm not sure how exactly that works :P

It's probably in your disk cache. Try timing it after a fresh reboot.

comp09 wrote:

MegaApuTurkUltra wrote:

__init__ wrote:

SUBLIME IS BEST USE IT PLS

Please.
Brackets
it starts up faster than NPP for me…given that it's literally node.js + html I'm not sure how exactly that works :P

It's probably in your disk cache. Try timing it after a fresh reboot.

No need for a reboot
They have similar load times on a cleared cache.
Brackets feels faster though because it displays its window as fast as it can and displays a splash before you can actually edit while npp doesn't display its window until all the components are loaded.

and then there's sublime, which takes longer than both combined ಠ_ಠ

Yay updates!

Do you think Berkeley-style sockets will be to much bloat for the standard library?

Who's going to write a JSON parser (or a simple wrapper) for Nustack?