thanks alxephan


You may have noticed that I have decided to re-do this entire sticky. Please be aware, the Workarounds still exist.




You might come here and think to yourself: “What in the world is a workaround!” Well I'll explain it to you!

To put it simply, a workaround on Scratch is a way of making a script that does the function of a made-up block.

Workaround = A script that does a function = Made-up block

If you still aren't sure, here's an example:

I have a made-up block that I call:

(() + () + 1) :: operators

A workaround looks like this:

(() + (() + (1)))

See how the top one is made-up, but the bottom one isn't? Though the bottom one works just like the top one!

Here in the suggestions forum many people make suggestions for new blocks. The purpose of this thread is to keep up with blocks which have workarounds to!

—-

Notable Posts/Workarounds from other Suggestions:

A new operators block, similar to (letter () of ) by dvargasews

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

So, for anybody who's curious, here is the full workaround, that is the absolute best approximation to the block suggested in the OP, which stores its output in ‘result’:

define letters (a) to (b) of (str) => result
if <<<(a) < [1]> or <(b) < [1]>> or <<(a) > (length of (str))> or <(b) > (length of (str))>>> then
set [result v] to []
stop [this script v]
end
delete (all v) of [chars v]
set [i v] to (a)
if <(a) < (b)> then
repeat (((b) - (a)) + (1))
add (letter (i) of (str)) to [chars v]
change [i v] by (1)
end
else
repeat (((a) - (b)) + (1))
add (letter (i) of (str)) to [chars v]
change [i v] by (-1)
end
end
set [result v] to (chars)

“But that's too long!” I hear you say. Note that this is the absolute complete workaround, that does everything mentioned in the OP (reverse output on backwards indices) and then some (return the same thing as letter (0) of (str) if indices are out of bounds).

For the majority of cases, something much simpler will work, such as:

define letters (a) to (b) of (str) => result
set [i v] to (a)
set [result v] to []
repeat (((b) - (a)) + (1))
set [result v] to (join (result) (letter (i) of (str)))

Note that the only things this block does not support are a) reverse strings, b) bounds checking, and c) strings above the join block limit, which is barely even a problem, as most string manipulation will involve the join block anyways.

Also note that this block will still return a valid value for invalid bounds, simply due to how Scratch bound checks the letter of () block.

If the i variable is bothering you, it gets even better:

define next letter (i) (b) (str)
set [result v] to (join (result) (letter (i) of (str)))
if <(i) < (b)> then
next letter ((i) + (1)) (b) (str)
end

define letters (a) to (b) of (str) => result
set [result v] to []
next letter (a) (b) (str)

And if we had custom reporters, this block would need no variables at all.

To compare, the speed of all three blocks is pretty good for small strings, and the second one should work for almost anything that you would actually need to do in Scratch. It's likely that whatever block the Scratch Team implemented would also be slow on ridiculously large strings, simply because creating substrings, unless they are interned, is by nature an O(n) operation.

My point with this post is that OP's argument that the workaround is laggy / slow is basically moot; although this custom block only works in a single thread, if you are doing multi-threaded string manipulation you are already probably doing something wrong.

I'm honestly not sure where I stand in terms of better string manipulation features in Scratch - certainly they are useful, but figuring out how to implement them myself was honestly one of the best critical thinking exercises I ever received from Scratch. It's important to be able to know how these sorts of operations work on the inside, as it allows you to see how slow they really are - I think people learning to implement them manually is a good experience, and I think that it is not at all bad that Scratch provides it.

I especially think that if we do ever get custom reporters, we should not implement blocks like these - if there were custom reporters (and maybe local variables) than implementing these blocks by hand would have very little negative effect, while it would have a huge educational effect.

Maybe not though. I am using anecdotal evidence here, but I don't think my point is entirely invalid.

Concerning the Bounce block

TheMonsterOfTheDeep wrote:

Because they seem to be cropping up, let me make an offtopic post to clear up some misconceptions about the bounce block…

It's very difficult to make a general “bounce” block, because what it does is reflect the sprite by mirroring its velocity across the line normal to the surface it hits. (Sorry, it's kind of hard to be exactly clear about what it does, so I'm trying to be specific).

However, it's very likely that this block would work imperfectly, at least for bitmap sprites, because the normal line calculated would be more of an “average” normal line than the actual line.

That's not the only problem, of course - the other problem is the question of what to do when the sprite is intersecting (not merely touching the edge of) the other sprite, and what to do when it's touching or intersecting multiple sprites.

The ‘if on edge, bounce’ block is comparatively simple - it merely means that if the sprite is touching or intersecting an edge, reflect across the line perpendicular to that edge in the middle of the sprite, which is really easy to do.

(The reason intersection works for the edge and not for sprites is because the edge is a single line - it's easy to define where the reflection line is, which is straight in the middle of the sprite. However, if it is intersecting a generally shaped object, you also have to calculate the normal line - and where to calculate that is based on where it is touching, which is ambiguous.)

P.S. If you would like to discuss the bounce block more, please make a new topic or find an old one (I'm pretty sure there is at least one old one you can use).

Workarounds
Note: If you have trouble finding one already in the list then make a post asking about a workaround to a certain block. I'll reply with the workaround if there is one!


NOTICE: I honestly don't want to overkill these posts with workarounds so I'm working on separate projects for workarounds for each category!


Motion:
None!

Looks:

previous costume ::looks

switch costume to ((costume #) - (1))

____________________

(showing? :: looks)

define hide
hide
set [showing v] to [false ]

define show
show
set [showing v] to [true]

if <(showing)=[true]> then
   say [ you can see me!]
else
    say [you can't see me!]

____________________

color :: reporter looks //works for any effect, just change the dropdowns/var names

change [color v] effect by (25)
change [color v] by (25)

____________________
____________________
____________________
Sound:
None!

Pen:

set pen color to hexadecimal input [] :: pen // Applies to all set pen color hex variants

set pen color to ((((R) * (65536)) + ((G) * (256))) + (B))

____________________
____________________

Events:

([  v] recieved? ::events)


when green flag clicked
set [var v] to [0]
forever
    
if <(var) = [1]> then
    
set [var v] to [0]
...
end

end


when I receive [message v]
set [var v] to [1]
wait (0.25) secs
set [var v] to [0]

____________________

when <> ::events hat
...


when [timer v] > (0.1)
forever
    
if <> then
    ...
end

end

____________________

when costume switches to [costume1 v] ::events hat

when gf clicked
forever
 wait until <([costume name v] of [sprite v]) = [costume name here]>
 ...
end

____________________
The workaround for a for/while loop:

set [i v] to [0 
repeat until <(i) = (45)>
...
change [i v] by (1)
end

____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________

Control:

if <> then {
} else if <> {
} :: control

if <> then
    
else
if <> then
    
end

end

____________________

forever if <> {
} :: control cap

forever
    
if <> then
    
end

end

____________________

repeat () secs {
} :: control

reset timer //this will only work if you're not using the timer elsewhere in your project
repeat until <(timer) = (number)>
    ...
end

set [old timer v] to (timer)
repeat until (((timer) - (old timer)) > (seconds ::grey) ) //use this if you are using the timer elsewhere in your project
 ...
end

____________________

repeat (1) secs {
} :: control

The best workaround:

set [mode v] to (0)
broadcast [repeat secs v] and wait
when I receive [repeat secs v]
if <(mode)=[0]> then
set [t v] to (((days since 2000)*(86400))+(seconds::grey))
wait until <((days since 2000)*(86400))>(t)>
set [mode v] to [1]
broadcast [repeat secs v]
end
when I receive [repeat secs v]
if <(mode)=[0]> then
forever
...
end
end

Because sometimes the script inside the loop will run longer than it is supposed to, like in this situation:

repeat (1) secs {
wait (2) secs
} :: control

____________________

(CloneID::control)

set [clone id v] to [0 ]
repeat (...)
    
create clone of [sprite v]
change [clone id v] by (1)
end


when I start as a clone
if <(clone id) = [1 ]> then
    ...:: grey
end

____________________

spawn {
...
} :: control

broadcast [spawn v]
when I receive [spawn v]
...

____________________

for each((var) : (list :: list):: reporter control) {
...   
} :: control
//Workaround:

set [var v] to [] // leave this blank
set [i v] to [1] //since scratch's array index starts in 1
repeat (length of [array v])
set [var v] to (item (i v) of [array  v])
... //do your stuffs here
change [i v] by (1)
end

____________________
____________________

Sensing:

(clone? ::sensing)

when I start as a clone
set [clone? v] to [true] //variable for this sprite only

____________________

(ask in progress? ::sensing)

set [ask v] to [1]
ask [...] and wait
set [ask v] to [0]

____________________

(sprite clicked? ::sensing)


when this sprite clicked
set [clicked v] to [1]
wait until <not <<mouse down?> and <touching [mouse-pointer v] ?> >>
set [clicked v] to [0]

____________________

day of year :: sensing reporter 

((days since 2000) - ((365) * ((current [year v]) - (2000))))

____________________
____________________
____________________
____________________

Operators:
Project

____________________
Variables/Lists:
Project
____________________

bump?

What's the suggestion here?

Sheep_tester wrote:

What's the suggestion here?

It's an updated version of the sticky.

I'll report this to be stickied.

U^ｪ^U::motion//This is Blocky. He lives in my signature. He is a trained attack block. He protects my siggy from kumquats.

DaSpudLord wrote:

I'll report this to be stickied.

I'm waiting for a response from the original topic owner to see if they are willing to give up the responsibility. If I don't hear back in a few days, we'll assume that they have moved on.

Workaround for when stop sign clicked. Use sparingly!

when green flag clicked
forever
set [timer.1 v] to ((timer) + (0.1))
end

when [timer v] > (timer.1)
...

(letters () to () of []::operators)

has this workaround:

(letters (number::grey) to (other number::grey) of (string::grey)::operators)

is the same as

(solution)

at the end of the following script:

set [index v] to (number::grey)
set [solution v] to []
repeat until <(index) > (other number::grey)>
set [solution v] to (join (solution) (letter (index) of (string::grey)))
change [index v] by (1)
end

I have quite a few workarounds in the studio in my signature, so you can use those, if you want.

Scratcher1002 wrote:

I have quite a few workarounds in the studio in my signature, so you can use those, if you want.

I prefer it if you post each one in Scratchblocks that way I don't get clogged up with workarounds to post!

Thanks for reposting this!

Could someone give me a workaround to if some variable contains another? EG:

set [ variable1] to [HELLO!!!!!! ]
set [variable2] to [HELLO]
if (variable2) contains (variable1) then
    set [variable1] to (pick random (1) to (10))
end

Thanks!

The workaround for a for/while oop:

set [i v] to [0 
repeat until <(i) = (45)>
...
change [i v] by (1)
end

Nice!

PythonKitten wrote:

Could someone give me a workaround to if some variable contains another? EG:

set [ variable1] to [HELLO!!!!!! ]
set [variable2] to [HELLO]
if (variable2) contains (variable1) then
    set [variable1] to (pick random (1) to (10))
end

Maybe I wasn't clear, I don't know. But if you have questions about scripts please go to the Help With Scripts forum.
Please read question 7 next time! Thanks

DrKat123 wrote:

The workaround for a for/while oop:

set [i v] to [0 
repeat until <(i) = (45)>
...
change [i v] by (1)
end

Thanks!

I got some more workarounds!

color :: reporter looks

change [color v] effect by (25)
change [color v] by (25)

for each((var) : (list :: list):: reporter control) ::cstart control 
...   
end
//Workaround:

set [var v] to [] // leave this blank
set [i v] to [1] //since scratch's array index starts in 1
repeat (length of [array v])
set [var v] to (item (i v) of [array  v])
... //do your stuffs here
change [i v] by (1)
end

Oh. Sorry about that!