I want to work with him on a game but I can't figure out how. If this isn't a feature then make it one.

dagrom wrote:

I want to work with him on a game but I can't figure out how. If this isn't a feature then make it one.

Take turns remixing the game.

footsocktoe wrote:

Take turns remixing the game.


……………. SHOOT THE SPACE MONSTERS! …………….

A game everyone can play! Has a “no lose” free play mode! Bright colors, bonky sounds! You will love this game!

Nice advertisement -_-

Like I said: I want to work with him SIMULTANEOUSLY. That means at the SAME TIME.

I repeat my above statement. If I can't work with him simultaneous;y, then I should be able to.

[Removed… keep it polite]

dagrom wrote:

footsocktoe wrote:

Take turns remixing the game.


……………. SHOOT THE SPACE MONSTERS! …………….

A game everyone can play! Has a “no lose” free play mode! Bright colors, bonky sounds! You will love this game!

Nice advertisement -_-

Like I said: I want to work with him SIMULTANEOUSLY. That means at the SAME TIME.

I repeat my above statement. If I can't work with him simultaneous;y, then I should be able to.

that was a signature. by the way, you can quote people with out copying their posts. it's not advertising. you wouldn't get the signature if you quoted

This is a signature. The user can do anything as long as it abides the community guidelines.

Also, this has been rejected in the past- There is really no way to program simultaneously on a project. Doing so may cause people logging out randomly if you share an account.

Invite your friend over, and you guys can simply program from there.

Ah I didn't realize that Thanks. Anyways, I still just want an answer to my question.

DownsGameClub wrote:

This is a signature. The user can do anything as long as it abides the community guidelines.

Also, this has been rejected in the past- There is really no way to program simultaneously on a project. Doing so may cause people logging out randomly if you share an account.

Invite your friend over, and you guys can simply program from there.

well, we live in different countries, so that may be a problem… Ugh, I give up. I'm unfollowing this thread. As your signature states, it's gone way off course.

dagrom wrote:

Ah I didn't realize that Thanks. Anyways, I still just want an answer to my question.

well, there is no way to do that currently. footsocktoe's answer was correct. if you want to suggest that, go to suggestions and suggest that there

Remixing and backpacking is the only answer. Collab accounts are now banned on Scratch, due to privacy issues.

Well that sucks. Is there a way I can write some code and give it to him?

Oh, and sorry, footsocktoe. I didn't realize that was a signature.

dagrom wrote:

Well that sucks. Is there a way I can write some code and give it to him?

Like others have already said, by remixing and backpacking the scripts.

If you really don't want to do that, you last option is to make a shared account.
A shared account is when both of you have the password to the account.
It's highly discouraged by the Scratch Team, but not banned.

This means to of you have access and can edit the same project.
However, still no simultaneous editing.

If the two of you were to edit the project at the exact same time, only one version would be saved.

PrincessPanda_test_ wrote:

Remixing and backpacking is the only answer. Collab accounts are now banned on Scratch, due to privacy issues.

Last time I checked, it's just really highly discouraged by the Scratch Team.
Like, “guys, we can't/won't stop you but seriously don't do it” level of discouragement.

Not trying to argue, I'm genuinely curious - when did the Scratch Team outright ban collab accounts?
Can you link me to an announcement or topic if there is one (I probably missed it)?

That really stinks because I want to work on a project with @BCRocks and I have been searching for a way to do so without remixing. I hope the Scratch team can change their minds and make it possible in the future.

HenKna01 wrote:

That really stinks because I want to work on a project with @BCRocks and I have been searching for a way to do so without remixing. I hope the Scratch team can change their minds and make it possible in the future.

Hi there and welcome to the forums! We are so excited to have you as a part of our community! Just remember that as fun as the Forums are, there are rules you need to follow so the forums stay happy. Make sure to read the stickies before posting. Look at the date of the last post. February!!! What? That's, like, a million years ago (figuratively)! This topic is long dead. By posting on it, your are necroposting. Please refrain from doing so in the future. Thanks and keep Scratchin'!
Also, it won't be added for the reason below:

le sticky wrote:

24. Live editing

Paddle2See wrote:
I agree that it isn't something we can support right now, because of the moderation and technical issues…
I do think it should be added to the rejection list because the moderation and technical issues are quite substantial and I don't think we should spend time discussing it until we have more resources available to address those.

Bright-Idea wrote:

HenKna01 wrote:

That really stinks because I want to work on a project with @BCRocks and I have been searching for a way to do so without remixing. I hope the Scratch team can change their minds and make it possible in the future.

Hi there and welcome to the forums! We are so excited to have you as a part of our community! Just remember that as fun as the Forums are, there are rules you need to follow so the forums stay happy. Make sure to read the stickies before posting. Look at the date of the last post. February!!! What? That's, like, a million years ago (figuratively)! This topic is long dead. By posting on it, your are necroposting. Please refrain from doing so in the future. Thanks and keep Scratchin'!
Also, it won't be added for the reason below:

le sticky wrote:

24. Live editing

Paddle2See wrote:
I agree that it isn't something we can support right now, because of the moderation and technical issues…
I do think it should be added to the rejection list because the moderation and technical issues are quite substantial and I don't think we should spend time discussing it until we have more resources available to address those.

Also, it's a duplicate discussion, probably at least twelve times over. See this.
Actually, never mind about the duplicate post part. This was posted first.