Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Collaboration
- » Closed
![[RSS Feed]](//cdn.scratch.mit.edu/scratchr2/static/__5b3e40ec58a840b41702360e9891321b__//djangobb_forum/img/feed-icon-small.png "[RSS Feed]")
![[RSS Feed]](http://cdn.scratch.mit.edu/scratchr2/static/__5b3e40ec58a840b41702360e9891321b__//djangobb_forum/img/feed-icon-small.png "[RSS Feed]"){kind=icon}
- MegaByteCorporations
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
Well, I can/have done a cloud chat engine before, but I'm not sure about the cloud multiplayer, I think we just take some little steps, get a working RPG engine, get a kinda small game with it and build up from there.Yeah, like make the game, then build up and out, so it becomes a large game.
- hello2248
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Closed
and I already have a chat engine, I'll brush it up when we need it though, so anything else?
- MegaByteCorporations
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
and I already have a chat engine, I'll brush it up when we need it though, so anything else?Maybe…….a damage simulator?
- MathlyCat
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
Guys chatrooms are banned. Only whitelist word chatrooms are allowed. (Only a selection of words to choose)
Wut? RPGs just require a lot of variable counts. We need to design the base of it first as RPGs are complex so you need the base vars, graphic engine, etc. THEN build off of that.and I already have a chat engine, I'll brush it up when we need it though, so anything else?Maybe…….a damage simulator?
- MegaByteCorporations
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
Guys chatrooms are banned. Only whitelist word chatrooms are allowed. (Only a selection of words to choose)As in a chatting stream, but a restricted chatroom would be a lot better, as in banning certain combinations of letters and symbols
- Ritz1125
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
But if we did it like Club Penguin's Ultimate Safe Chat(basically just words and phrases to choose from) it would DEFINITELY be better. But, then some users wouldn't like that.Guys chatrooms are banned. Only whitelist word chatrooms are allowed. (Only a selection of words to choose)As in a chatting stream, but a restricted chatroom would be a lot better, as in banning certain combinations of letters and symbols
Last edited by Ritz1125 (Feb. 11, 2016 01:33:37)
- hello2248
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Closed
I have already made a whitelisted chat room that I will polish up when needed
- MegaByteCorporations
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
But if we did it like Club Penguin's Ultimate Safe Chat(basically just words and phrases to choose from) it would DEFINITELY be better. But, then some users wouldn't like that.I tried to play Club Penguin once and my computer crashed because of how many people were on there.
- Lego-Lovin-Program
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
Not allowed toGuys chatrooms are banned. Only whitelist word chatrooms are allowed. (Only a selection of words to choose)As in a chatting stream, but a restricted chatroom would be a lot better, as in banning certain combinations of letters and symbols
- csf38592
-
Scratcher
49 posts
Closed
But if we did it like Club Penguin's Ultimate Safe Chat(basically just words and phrases to choose from) it would DEFINITELY be better. But, then some users wouldn't like that.Guys chatrooms are banned. Only whitelist word chatrooms are allowed. (Only a selection of words to choose)As in a chatting stream, but a restricted chatroom would be a lot better, as in banning certain combinations of letters and symbols
Although this could be good, we would have to make many many options to choose from. I find it very frustrating with these chat engines and not ever being able to get my point across to others
- ZLGames
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
Griffpatch made a whitelist that has like 10,000+ words.But if we did it like Club Penguin's Ultimate Safe Chat(basically just words and phrases to choose from) it would DEFINITELY be better. But, then some users wouldn't like that.Guys chatrooms are banned. Only whitelist word chatrooms are allowed. (Only a selection of words to choose)As in a chatting stream, but a restricted chatroom would be a lot better, as in banning certain combinations of letters and symbols
Although this could be good, we would have to make many many options to choose from. I find it very frustrating with these chat engines and not ever being able to get my point across to others
- csf38592
-
Scratcher
49 posts
Closed
Griffpatch made a whitelist that has like 10,000+ words.
That could be useful although using our own things would also be nice. I don't know if this project is entirely done by the people in the collab or not but it would be cool if everything was self made by collaborators. Idk to be honest.
- Ritz1125
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
Right. The USC on CP is DEFINITELY good! But then that would take a toll on our precious data.But if we did it like Club Penguin's Ultimate Safe Chat(basically just words and phrases to choose from) it would DEFINITELY be better. But, then some users wouldn't like that.Guys chatrooms are banned. Only whitelist word chatrooms are allowed. (Only a selection of words to choose)As in a chatting stream, but a restricted chatroom would be a lot better, as in banning certain combinations of letters and symbols
Although this could be good, we would have to make many many options to choose from. I find it very frustrating with these chat engines and not ever being able to get my point across to others
- Ritz1125
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
I play CP on blizzard(the most popular server) and I don't crash, I just LAGGGBut if we did it like Club Penguin's Ultimate Safe Chat(basically just words and phrases to choose from) it would DEFINITELY be better. But, then some users wouldn't like that.I tried to play Club Penguin once and my computer crashed because of how many people were on there.
60 second rule, you little scumbag. >;O ^_^
- Sigton
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
Right guys; we are indeed getting a bit ahead of ourselves here 
First of all we need to create the minimal-viable-product; in this case, the battle engine.
Sigton
First of all we need to create the minimal-viable-product; in this case, the battle engine.
Sigton
- MarkyFox_YOLO
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
Closed
Name (What you prefer to be called):Ash,Marky or Fox what ever you want to
Job (What job you are wanting to do):If you can Get me Artist and music Persons and i dont want to do everything
Interest (How dedicated you will be, 1-10):9
Activity (How often you are on Scratch, 1-10):8
Experience (How long have you been on Scratch):about 1 year and 2 months
Marky
Lol im still doing it
Last edited by MarkyFox_YOLO (Feb. 11, 2016 18:10:37)
- MegaByteCorporations
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
Right guys; we are indeed getting a bit ahead of ourselves hereAnd we're waiting on 16 right?
First of all we need to create the minimal-viable-product; in this case, the battle engine.
Sigton
- 16luongl1
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
Nope, passed that job onto Sigton a while ago.Right guys; we are indeed getting a bit ahead of ourselves hereAnd we're waiting on 16 right?
First of all we need to create the minimal-viable-product; in this case, the battle engine.
Sigton
- MegaByteCorporations
-
Scratcher
1000+ posts
Closed
Oh.Nope, passed that job onto Sigton a while ago.Right guys; we are indeed getting a bit ahead of ourselves hereAnd we're waiting on 16 right?
First of all we need to create the minimal-viable-product; in this case, the battle engine.
Sigton
- Discussion Forums
- » Collaboration
-
» Closed