Borrego6165 wrote:

zdogz wrote:

Borrego6165 wrote:

zdogz wrote:

[Jumpy Square

I tried finding this project but I couldn't find it in the galleries. You must give me a link otherwise I won't know where it came from

It came from Misc. Games.

That's because you put Bouncy Square, not jumpy! :D Also, you've left my annotations in the review.

zdogz wrote:

Borrego6165 wrote:

zdogz wrote:

Borrego6165 wrote:

zdogz wrote:

[Jumpy Square

I tried finding this project but I couldn't find it in the galleries. You must give me a link otherwise I won't know where it came from

It came from Misc. Games.

That's because you put Bouncy Square, not jumpy! :D Also, you've left my annotations in the review.

I fixed link.

777atscratch wrote:

Added 2 projects made by my follower in the Arcade .

777atscratch wrote:

Yeah! 100 points ? Are you joking ?

Borrego6165 wrote:

777atscratch wrote:

Yeah! 100 points ? Are you joking ?

Adding the signature bumped up your points A LOT, plus the 6 points from adding projects.

darkness3560 wrote:

Oh, and please review my games Slice and Circuit Breaker. The links are in my signature.

And now, how NOT to post: oh n plz review my proj's slice n circuit breaker da links r in mah siggy

zdogz wrote:

Graphics 4/5
Graphics were good.

zdogz wrote:

]Slice
A Scratch Fruit ninja
Game Design 10/10
Very fun and

Originality 0/10
Was basically Fruit Ninja.

Ease Of Use 5/5
Only used mouse- very easy to use.
Difficulty Balance 5/5
It was very hard.

Graphics 4/5
Graphics were good.

Sound 3/5
Music was not that fitting.

Firing Round 9/10 (This is the addition of the following scores)
Reliability 2/2
0 (Very Glitchy) 1 (A few glitches) 2 (Hardly any glitches)
Game Length 1/2
0 (Too Short) 1 (Decent Length) 2 (Long lasting or endless)
Game Pace 2/2
0 (Very slow or too long for it's own sake) 1 (Quite engrossing) 2 (Very well paced and fun)
Replay Value 2/2
0 (Would never replay/ did not want to finish it the first time) 1 (Might replay) 2 (Too good to stop!)
Programming 2/2
0 (Simple to make) 1 (Fairly advanced) 2 (It was very complex)

Overall Experience 34/50
Was a very good game.

TOTAL: 80/100

Key
0-19 I could have made that in my sleep!
20-39 Needs a lot of work.
40-59 An average project I suppose.
60-79 Quite a cool project.
80-94 Wow! It only needs a bit of tweaking.——–This one.
95-100 You're the top cat!

Borrego6165 wrote:

zdogz wrote:

]Slice
A Scratch Fruit ninja
Game Design 10/10
Very fun and worth playing.

Originality 0/10
Was basically Fruit Ninja.

Ease Of Use 5/5
Only used mouse- very easy to use.
Difficulty Balance 5/5
It was very hard.

Graphics 4/5
Graphics were good.

Sound 3/5
Music was not that fitting.

Firing Round 9/10 (This is the addition of the following scores)
Reliability 2/2
0 (Very Glitchy) 1 (A few glitches) 2 (Hardly any glitches)
Game Length 1/2
0 (Too Short) 1 (Decent Length) 2 (Long lasting or endless)
Game Pace 2/2
0 (Very slow or too long for it's own sake) 1 (Quite engrossing) 2 (Very well paced and fun)
Replay Value 2/2
0 (Would never replay/ did not want to finish it the first time) 1 (Might replay) 2 (Too good to stop!)
Programming 2/2
0 (Simple to make) 1 (Fairly advanced) 2 (It was very complex)

Overall Experience 34/50
Was a very good game.

TOTAL: 80/100

Key
0-19 I could have made that in my sleep!
20-39 Needs a lot of work.
40-59 An average project I suppose.
60-79 Quite a cool project.
80-94 Wow! It only needs a bit of tweaking.——–This one.
95-100 You're the top cat!

You've done everything correctly this time I'll give you 5 points, it's nothing to worry about but if you want the full 10 points I'll have to ask you to go into more detail. You didn't even finish the game design sentence. “Very fun and…”

darkness3560 wrote:

zdogz wrote:

Graphics 4/5
Graphics were good.

Thanks! I try to work hard on graphic design in my projects. It can really improve a project.

jh1234l wrote:

Yay! I added the signature!

Borrego6165 wrote:

jh1234l wrote:

Yay! I added the signature!

Your signature is very confusing! Whilst you don't have to have the same layout as I handed out, it needs to be a clear signature. Try to add a difference between the hideout and Scratching Fame.

jh1234l wrote:

I changed it to make it more clear.

Borrego6165 wrote:

jh1234l wrote:

I changed it to make it more clear.

Nice, except now that Scratching Fame is in blue, it looks like it's part of FAQ. It looks like FAQ went over the edge, so it was continued with Scratching Famer on the next line. What about:
LINE 1: (center)“Check out these two view-spreading charities:”(/center = code)
LINE 2: “Scratch Cat's Hideout:” ALL LINKS
LINE 3: “Scratching Fame”
LINE 4: Image (some maybe chopped off at the bottom, but only a few pixels. Should do no harm.)