ScratchX community discussion topic

Vikenator

BookOwl wrote:
I'm staying far, far away from this.

Aaaaand you just brought yourself into this by posting here.

-Radical-

@Firedrake That's not how I intended for it to sound, but I see your point. I changed the post.

You can use whatever you want, but it should have the same stuff as xampp (like a mysql database) Other than that, it's 100% up to you.

GrannyCookies

BookOwl wrote:
I'm staying far, far away from this.

-Radical-

Do you guys think we should base it off mod share or make it from scratch? Can I have an answer?

Jonathan50

-Radical- wrote:
Do you guys think we should base it off mod share or make it from scratch? Can I have an answer?

if you want to…
https://www.assembla.com/spaces/mod-share-iv/git/source

This software is available under a modified MIT license.


Copyright (c) 2012 - jvvg and LS97

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, or distribute copies of the Software for non-commercial purposes, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
When distributing the software, the copyright notices in the footer and some parts of the code must remain intact.
This software may only be distributed or modified for non-commercial purposes.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.

-Radical-

I'm aware, and will ask jvvg and ls97 for pointers.

IronBit_Studios

-Radical- wrote:
I'm aware, and will ask jvvg and ls97 for pointers.

I can: 0x3A28213A 0x6339392C 0x7363682E

comp09

IronBit_Studios wrote:
-Radical- wrote:
I'm aware, and will ask jvvg and ls97 for pointers.
I can: 0x3A28213A 0x6339392C 0x7363682E

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/187045/

Jonathan50

IronBit_Studios wrote:
-Radical- wrote:
I'm aware, and will ask jvvg and ls97 for pointers.
I can: 0x3A28213A 0x6339392C 0x7363682E

you have a lot of RAM and have an at least 128 bit processor…

-Radical-

Guys, you know that's not what I meant.

comp09

Jonathan50 wrote:
IronBit_Studios wrote:
-Radical- wrote:
I'm aware, and will ask jvvg and ls97 for pointers.
I can: 0x3A28213A 0x6339392C 0x7363682E
you have a lot of RAM and have an at least 128 bit processor…

I think you mean 32-bit. 1935894574 bytes is less than 2 GB.

Jonathan50

comp09 wrote:
Jonathan50 wrote:
IronBit_Studios wrote:
-Radical- wrote:
I'm aware, and will ask jvvg and ls97 for pointers.
I can: 0x3A28213A 0x6339392C 0x7363682E
you have a lot of RAM and have an at least 128 bit processor…
I think you mean 32-bit. 1935894574 bytes is less than 2 GB.

*64-bit

but he has probably over 4GB RAM

Last edited by Jonathan50 (Jan. 4, 2016 03:08:43)

IronBit_Studios

Yeah, but were you all too nerded out to notice the xkcd reference?

comp09

IronBit_Studios wrote:
Yeah, but were you all too nerded out to notice the xkcd reference?

https://scratch.mit.edu/discuss/post/187045/ < yes, I noticed the XKCD reference thanks to this post, brought to you by my search engine I saw that post when my indexer was just getting started and was messing with queries

Jonathan50

IronBit_Studios wrote:
Yeah, but were you all too nerded out to notice the xkcd reference?

I don't know about that xkcd

-Radical-

Please stay on topic!!

Znapi

Again, I think this is important.

Znapi wrote:
Isn't the ST already working on a way to make extensions a part of the main site too? Look at the FAQs for ScratchX. Extensions are already are apart of normal Scratch 2, it is just that only official extensions(PicoBoard and WeDo) are allowed on Scratch. I think when ScratchX came out someone found out that normal Scratch could run the same JavaScript based extensions Scratch X can.

The Scratch Team says that they plan on being able to make experimental extensions into official extensions, making them usable on the normal Scratch site.

If you guys were to make a Scratch site for ScratchX, I'm not sure it would be of much use once the ST makes those extensions a part of the main site too.

-Radical-

Maybe so, but that doesn't mean that eventually, you will be able to write extensions for the main Scratch. That would be about as effective as making crime illegal : If they became official, they wouldn't very well be extensions, would they?

Znapi

-Radical- wrote:
Maybe so, but that doesn't mean that eventually, you will be able to write extensions for the main Scratch. That would be about as effective as making crime illegal : If they became official, they wouldn't very well be extensions, would they?

They'd definitely still be extensions, just official rather than experimental. You'd have to make a quality extension that is safe to use first though before the ST make it official and usable on the main site, which isn't a bad thing.

-Radical-

But that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about making an SBX website.

Discuss Scratch