Discuss Scratch
- Discussion Forums
- » Things I'm Reading and Playing
- » FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
- helloumyst
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)

- danny61734
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
oh whats it about ;.;so the untold story thing on scotts website… any1 think its a new fnaf game (not FNAF world)?The image is fnaf_the novel.jpg so……..
fnaf 4 was the final chapter, not the final game
………..
its a novel.
- helloumyst
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
Dont aggree with my theories?

DOGE WITH IT

DOGE WITH IT
- BoS_Outcast
-
Scratcher
81 posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
these are my thoughtsMy thoughts are:
Mangle:Male Female
Puppet:Female
Mangle: Male
Puppet: Genderless
My thoughts:
Mangle:Genderless (It's a ROBOT!)
Puppet:Genderless
- the-awesome-dude
-
Scratcher
29 posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
well,for toy freddy, I don't know for sure, I'm judging by his mouth.The bite of 87 is obviously Fredbear/Golden Freddy. Here are the reasons why the others couldn't: BTW it took place in FNAF2
Freddy Fazbear: In the closet/repair room. The hand print on his face is from purple man when he stuffed the kids in the suits.
Bonnie: In the closet/repair room, and NO FACE! (DUH NOT BONNIE!)
Chica: In the closet/repair room.
Foxy: In the closet/repair room.
Toy Freddy: Seriously? The mouth COULD NOT EVEN DO DAMAGE TO A STUFFED ANIMAL.
Toy Bonnie: same as Toy Freddy.
Toy Chica: The beak is in the way. I know she can take it off, but if she did, the kid would run away.
The Mangle/Toy Foxy: Too mangled to do damage.
Balloon Boy: HE CAN"T MOVE HIS MOUTH!
The Puppet/Marionette: Same as Balloon Boy.
Springtrap: Doesn't exist yet.
Plus, why else would they tear Fredbear/Golden Freddy apart?
IDK.. the kid might not run away if Toy Chica did it.. you know how kids are sometimes….
AND Toy Foxy could have done it just fine.
But, true with balloon boy.
AND I did not know that Toy Freddy couldn't hurt a stuffed….
- the-awesome-dude
-
Scratcher
29 posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
what do you mean by that bite is not in 1987? And where did you learn springtrap existed? Edit: By the way, what do you think was my best evidence? I think it was the Freddy handprint thing.The bite of 87 is obviously Fredbear/Golden Freddy. Here are the reasons why the others couldn't: BTW it took place in FNAF2Springtrap actually did exist, and Golden Freddy couldn't do it because that bite was not in 1987. Mangle did it because she can still move enough to bite a kid. Other than that, you're mostly correct.
Freddy Fazbear: In the closet/repair room. The hand print on his face is from purple man when he stuffed the kids in the suits.
Bonnie: In the closet/repair room, and NO FACE! (DUH NOT BONNIE!)
Chica: In the closet/repair room.
Foxy: In the closet/repair room.
Toy Freddy: Seriously? The mouth COULD NOT EVEN DO DAMAGE TO A STUFFED ANIMAL.
Toy Bonnie: same as Toy Freddy.
Toy Chica: The beak is in the way. I know she can take it off, but if she did, the kid would run away.
The Mangle/Toy Foxy: Too mangled to do damage.
Balloon Boy: HE CAN"T MOVE HIS MOUTH!
The Puppet/Marionette: Same as Balloon Boy.
Springtrap: Doesn't exist yet.
Plus, why else would they tear Fredbear/Golden Freddy apart?
Last edited by the-awesome-dude (Dec. 22, 2015 17:26:07)
- LukeTriton10
-
Scratcher
49 posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
Wait, I thought that The Bite of ‘87 was from mangle?
Mangle had attacked one of the security guards, Jeremy Fitzgerald, or did it attack a child?
Bite of ’83 was by Golden Fredbear who attacked the FNAF 4 kid which actually DID happen. You can tell its the bite of 83 because the TV flashes a TV show featuring the FNAF characters that says 1983.
Atleast, thats what I got from Game Theory.
Mangle had attacked one of the security guards, Jeremy Fitzgerald, or did it attack a child?
Bite of ’83 was by Golden Fredbear who attacked the FNAF 4 kid which actually DID happen. You can tell its the bite of 83 because the TV flashes a TV show featuring the FNAF characters that says 1983.
Atleast, thats what I got from Game Theory.
- Nextor
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
… Nothing makes sense in FNAF anymore…
SCOTT Y U DO DIS
SCOTT Y U DO DIS- Nextor
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
OH MAH GAWD WUT ARE DA SILVER EYES???
Scottgames.com
Scottgames.com
- Forestwave
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
well,for toy freddy, I don't know for sure, I'm judging by his mouth.The bite of 87 is obviously Fredbear/Golden Freddy. Here are the reasons why the others couldn't: BTW it took place in FNAF2
Freddy Fazbear: In the closet/repair room. The hand print on his face is from purple man when he stuffed the kids in the suits.
Bonnie: In the closet/repair room, and NO FACE! (DUH NOT BONNIE!)
Chica: In the closet/repair room.
Foxy: In the closet/repair room.
Toy Freddy: Seriously? The mouth COULD NOT EVEN DO DAMAGE TO A STUFFED ANIMAL.
Toy Bonnie: same as Toy Freddy.
Toy Chica: The beak is in the way. I know she can take it off, but if she did, the kid would run away.
The Mangle/Toy Foxy: Too mangled to do damage.
Balloon Boy: HE CAN"T MOVE HIS MOUTH!
The Puppet/Marionette: Same as Balloon Boy.
Springtrap: Doesn't exist yet.
Plus, why else would they tear Fredbear/Golden Freddy apart?
IDK.. the kid might not run away if Toy Chica did it.. you know how kids are sometimes….
AND Toy Foxy could have done it just fine.
But, true with balloon boy.
AND I did not know that Toy Freddy couldn't hurt a stuffed….
I think that his mouth could do SOMETHING ( im not saying he DID it..)
- jjjax79
-
Scratcher
6 posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
hello internet
im so happy to fianlly share this. what happend if the brothers were possesed i think this because when the brother jumpscares you under the bed he dosent have no white perpiles BUT when in the 5th minigame there perpiles are white but the bully with the freddy mask was not possesed he just wanted to join in. so that was just my theory tell me if im wrong
or right 
im so happy to fianlly share this. what happend if the brothers were possesed i think this because when the brother jumpscares you under the bed he dosent have no white perpiles BUT when in the 5th minigame there perpiles are white but the bully with the freddy mask was not possesed he just wanted to join in. so that was just my theory tell me if im wrong
or right 
- lilykatla
-
Scratcher
65 posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
Yes, Mangle DID do the bite of 87' because Mangle got damaged up by kids from the bite. Backstory: Mangle used to be all fixed up, then a kid kept poking her so Mangle got so annoyed she got malfunctioned and bit off the child's frontal lobe which will cause damage to the brain, so that child must of forgot who his friends were, or his family. Then, the other kids started ripping Mangle apart, even the kids mom and dad. That's what the story of the 87' Bite. It could be Old/Withered Chica. (Another backstory if Old/Withered Chica did the bite) Old/Withered Chica was in parts and serves than, a child walked into the room while his mom was in the bathroom. (That child had to be 4 then.) He saw Old/Withered Chica, that child was scared, so he screamed so loud no one could hear him, but Old/Withered Chica could. So she opened her fixed jaw, and snaped off that child's frontal lobe, and that's how Old/Withered Chica got the downwards HUGE jaw, and might of did the 87' Bite. (All of that makes sence) And @jjjax779 the fifth game hasn't came out yet. I think your talking about the fourth, and that wasn't in there and it makes no sence at all, and you were wrong. (were talking about the 87' bite and a theory who done it)

- LookAroundYou
-
Scratcher
2 posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
omg, my theory for all of the games (1,2,3,4) is THAT IT WAS ALL A DREAM.
- danny61734
-
Scratcher
100+ posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
omg, my theory for all of the games (1,2,3,4) is THAT IT WAS ALL A DREAM.ah a game theory watcher i see
- lilykatla
-
Scratcher
65 posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
Yes, Mangle DID do the bite of 87' because Mangle got damaged up by kids from the bite. Backstory: Mangle used to be all fixed up, then a kid kept poking her so Mangle got so annoyed she got malfunctioned and bit off the child's frontal lobe which will cause damage to the brain, so that child must of forgot who his friends were, or his family. Then, the other kids started ripping Mangle apart, even the kids mom and dad. That's what the story of the 87' Bite. It could be Old/Withered Chica. (Another backstory if Old/Withered Chica did the bite) Old/Withered Chica was in parts and serves than, a child walked into the room while his mom was in the bathroom. (That child had to be 4 then.) He saw Old/Withered Chica, that child was scared, so he screamed so loud no one could hear him, but Old/Withered Chica could. So she opened her fixed jaw, and snaped off that child's frontal lobe, and that's how Old/Withered Chica got the downwards HUGE jaw, and might of did the 87' Bite. (All of that makes sence) And @jjjax779 the fifth game hasn't came out yet. I think your talking about the fourth, and that wasn't in there and it makes no sence at all, and you were wrong. (were talking about the 87' bite and a theory who done it)Not always perfect me!
Submit Go back
- lilykatla
-
Scratcher
65 posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
It wasn't evidence, scott is tricking you. The first game took place in 2012. A child did it because She/he was touching freddy. (because they were 3, or 4)CORRECT!!! Winner!The bite of 87 is obviously Fredbear/Golden Freddy. Here are the reasons why the others couldn't: BTW it took place in FNAF2umm… they teared Mangle.
Freddy Fazbear: In the closet/repair room. The hand print on his face is from purple man when he stuffed the kids in the suits.
Bonnie: In the closet/repair room, and NO FACE! (DUH NOT BONNIE!)
Chica: In the closet/repair room.
Foxy: In the closet/repair room.
Toy Freddy: Seriously? The mouth COULD NOT EVEN DO DAMAGE TO A STUFFED ANIMAL. (change) He can because of his teeth. @lilykatla
Toy Bonnie: same as Toy Freddy.
Toy Chica: The beak is in the way. I know she can take it off, but if she did, the kid would run away.(change) He/She wouldn't run.
The Mangle/Toy Foxy: Too mangled to do damage. (changed) Bite did her damage. Try harder next time.
Balloon Boy: HE CAN"T MOVE HIS MOUTH! (changed) he can
The Puppet/Marionette: Same as Balloon Boy.(changed) she has a huge mouth in real.
Springtrap: Doesn't exist yet. (does exist but bite is in 2nd game= 1987, January ???
Plus, why else would they tear Fredbear/Golden Freddy apart?
Springtrap actually did exist, and Golden Freddy couldn't do it because that bite was not in 1987. Mangle did it because she can still move enough to bite a kid. Other than that, you're mostly correct.
what do you mean by that bite is not in 1987? And where did you learn springtrap existed? Edit: By the way, what do you think was my best evidence? I think it was the Freddy handprint thing.
- Scratchingthecode97
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
what evidence is there for it being in 2012?It wasn't evidence, scott is tricking you. The first game took place in 2012. A child did it because She/he was touching freddy. (because they were 3, or 4)CORRECT!!! Winner!The bite of 87 is obviously Fredbear/Golden Freddy. Here are the reasons why the others couldn't: BTW it took place in FNAF2umm… they teared Mangle.
Freddy Fazbear: In the closet/repair room. The hand print on his face is from purple man when he stuffed the kids in the suits.
Bonnie: In the closet/repair room, and NO FACE! (DUH NOT BONNIE!)
Chica: In the closet/repair room.
Foxy: In the closet/repair room.
Toy Freddy: Seriously? The mouth COULD NOT EVEN DO DAMAGE TO A STUFFED ANIMAL. (change) He can because of his teeth. @lilykatla
Toy Bonnie: same as Toy Freddy.
Toy Chica: The beak is in the way. I know she can take it off, but if she did, the kid would run away.(change) He/She wouldn't run.
The Mangle/Toy Foxy: Too mangled to do damage. (changed) Bite did her damage. Try harder next time.
Balloon Boy: HE CAN"T MOVE HIS MOUTH! (changed) he can
The Puppet/Marionette: Same as Balloon Boy.(changed) she has a huge mouth in real.
Springtrap: Doesn't exist yet. (does exist but bite is in 2nd game= 1987, January ???
Plus, why else would they tear Fredbear/Golden Freddy apart?
Springtrap actually did exist, and Golden Freddy couldn't do it because that bite was not in 1987. Mangle did it because she can still move enough to bite a kid. Other than that, you're mostly correct.
what do you mean by that bite is not in 1987? And where did you learn springtrap existed? Edit: By the way, what do you think was my best evidence? I think it was the Freddy handprint thing.
- lilykatla
-
Scratcher
65 posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
Evidence: 2nd game was in 1987, so it HAS to be in 2012, 3 years ago. 

- lilykatla
-
Scratcher
65 posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
Evidence: 2nd game was in 1987, so it HAS to be in 2012, 3 years ago.The first game was in 2012. :I
- Scratchingthecode97
-
Scratcher
500+ posts
FNAF THEORIES (The Expanded Universe of the Five Nights At Freddy's games)
Evidence: 2nd game was in 1987, so it HAS to be in 2012, 3 years ago.why does it have to be? So far that isn't evidence at all.